Migraine Increases Centre-Surround Suppression for Drifting Visual Stimuli
暂无分享,去创建一个
Allison M. McKendrick | David R. Badcock | Josephine Battista | D. Badcock | A. McKendrick | Josephine Battista
[1] Mark W. Cannon,et al. Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations , 1991, Vision Research.
[2] G. Coppola,et al. Is The Cerebral Cortex Hyperexcitable or Hyperresponsive in Migraine? , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[3] S. Dakin,et al. Weak suppression of visual context in chronic schizophrenia , 2005, Current Biology.
[4] R. Lipton,et al. Migraine in the United States: Epidemiology and patterns of health care use , 2002, Neurology.
[5] Randolph Blake,et al. Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing , 2003, Nature.
[6] E. Chronicle,et al. Suppression of perception in migraine: Evidence for reduced inhibition in the visual cortex , 2001 .
[7] A. Shepherd. Visual Contrast Processing in Migraine , 2000, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[8] Alessandra Angelucci,et al. Contrast-dependence of surround suppression in Macaque V1: Experimental testing of a recurrent network model , 2010, NeuroImage.
[9] Tatsuto Takeuchi,et al. Modulation of perceived contrast by a moving surround , 2000, Vision Research.
[10] E. Chronicle,et al. Cortical Inhibition Is Reduced in Chronic and Episodic Migraine and Demonstrates a Spectrum of Illness , 2005, Headache.
[11] Christopher Patrick Taylor,et al. Aging Reduces Center-Surround Antagonism in Visual Motion Processing , 2005, Neuron.
[12] Allison M. McKendrick,et al. Aging alters surround modulation of perceived contrast. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[13] A J Shepherd,et al. Increased visual after-effects following pattern adaptation in migraine: a lack of intracortical excitation? , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[14] A. Shepherd. Local and global motion after-effects are both enhanced in migraine, and the underlying mechanisms differ across cortical areas. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[15] B. Efron,et al. A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .
[16] D. Badcock,et al. Visual dysfunction between migraine events. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[17] D. Badcock,et al. Psychophysical measurement of neural adaptation abnormalities in magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in glaucoma. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[18] D. Badcock,et al. Motion Processing Deficits in Migraine , 2004, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[19] G. Benedek,et al. Spatial Contrast Sensitivity of Migraine Patients Without Aura , 2002, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[20] J. Schoenen,et al. Evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: published data and viewpoint on their pathophysiologic significance , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[21] M. Moskowitz,et al. New insights into migraine pathophysiology , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.
[22] C. Granziera,et al. Anatomical Alterations of the Visual Motion Processing Network in Migraine with and without Aura , 2006, PLoS medicine.
[23] P. Drummond,et al. Migraine and motion sickness: What is the link? , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.
[24] J. Movshon,et al. Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.
[25] R. Lipton,et al. The Global Burden of Headache: A Documentation of Headache Prevalence and Disability Worldwide , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[26] D. Badcock,et al. Decreased visual field sensitivity measured 1 day, then 1 week, after migraine. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[27] D. Heeger,et al. Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement , 2001, Vision Research.
[28] J A Solomon,et al. Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[29] R. Wurtz,et al. Functional Identification of a Pulvinar Path from Superior Colliculus to Cortical Area MT , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[30] D. Badcock,et al. Contrast-processing dysfunction in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in migraineurs with or without aura. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[31] W. Stewart,et al. Clinical Utility of an Instrument Assessing Migraine Disability: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire , 2001, Headache.
[32] R Shapley,et al. Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.
[33] F. Wilkinson,et al. Binocular Rivalry in Migraine , 2008, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[34] M. Anderson,et al. Visual Field Loss After Attacks of Migraine With Aura , 1992, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[35] M. Gazzaniga,et al. The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .
[36] J. Olesen. The International Classification of Headache Disorders , 2008, Headache.
[37] J. Masdeu,et al. Human Cerebral Activation during Steady-State Visual-Evoked Responses , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[38] C. Kennard,et al. Responses to Temporal Visual Stimuli in Migraine: The Critical Flicker Fusion Test , 1995, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[39] L. Battelli,et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual area V5 in migraine , 2002, Neurology.
[40] Timothy De Ver Dye,et al. Migraine and the Environment , 2009, Headache.
[41] P. Koehler,et al. Suppression of perception in migraine , 2001, Neurology.
[42] S. Aurora,et al. The Brain is Hyperexcitable in Migraine , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[43] E. Piovesan,et al. Critical Flicker Frequency in Migraine. A Controlled Study in Patients without Prophylactic Therapy , 2005, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[44] D M Levi,et al. Surround modulation of perceived contrast and the role of brightness induction. , 2001, Journal of vision.
[45] Allison M McKendrick,et al. Center-surround visual motion processing in migraine. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[46] G. A. Lambert,et al. The Mode of Action of Migraine Triggers: A Hypothesis , 2009, Headache.
[47] Barry B. Lee,et al. Chapter 7 New views of primate retinal function , 1990 .
[48] C. Johnson,et al. Visual field loss in migraine. , 1989, Ophthalmology.
[49] B. Fierro,et al. Cortical Hypoactivity or Reduced Efficiency of Cortical Inhibition in Migraine? , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[50] A. Yarangümeli,et al. Glaucomatous visual field defects in patients with migraine , 2003, Journal of Neurology.
[51] M. Soso,et al. Migraine and stripe-induced visual discomfort. , 1989, Archives of neurology.
[52] A. Antal,et al. Altered Motion Perception in Migraineurs: Evidence for Interictal Cortical Hyperexcitability , 2005, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[53] A. McKendrick,et al. Low Spatial Frequency Contrast Sensitivity Deficits in Migraine are not Visual Pathway Selective , 2009, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[54] Randolph Blake,et al. Weakened Center-Surround Interactions in Visual Motion Processing in Schizophrenia , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[55] F. Wilkinson,et al. Visual Contrast Gain Control in Migraine: Measures of Visual Cortical Excitability and Inhibition , 2000, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.
[56] H. Spekreijse,et al. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex and scene perception , 2000 .
[57] A. Angelucci,et al. Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. , 2006, Progress in brain research.
[58] D. Badcock,et al. Processing of global form and motion in migraineurs , 2006, Vision Research.
[59] F A Wichmann,et al. Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .
[60] W. Newsome,et al. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[61] G. Dutton,et al. Visual noise selectively degrades vision in migraine. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[62] D. Pietrobon. Insights into migraine mechanisms and CaV2.1 calcium channel function from mouse models of familial hemiplegic migraine , 2010, The Journal of physiology.
[63] Charles E. Riva,et al. Visually evoked hemodynamical response and assessment of neurovascular coupling in the optic nerve and retina , 2005, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.
[64] A. McKendrick,et al. An Analysis of the Factors Associated with Visual Field Deficits Measured with Flickering Stimuli in-between Migraine , 2004, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.