Stay Ahead of Poachers: Illegal Wildlife Poaching Prediction and Patrol Planning Under Uncertainty with Field Test Evaluations (Short Version)

Illegal wildlife poaching threatens ecosystems and drives endangered species toward extinction. However, efforts for wildlife protection are constrained by the limited resources of law enforcement agencies. To help combat poaching, the Protection Assistant for Wildlife Security (PAWS) is a machine learning pipeline that has been developed as a data-driven approach to identify areas at high risk of poaching throughout protected areas and compute optimal patrol routes. In this paper, we take an end-to-end approach to the data-to-deployment pipeline for anti-poaching. In doing so, we address challenges including extreme class imbalance (up to 1:200), bias, and uncertainty in wildlife poaching data to enhance PAWS, and we apply our methodology to three national parks with diverse characteristics. (i) We use Gaussian processes to quantify predictive uncertainty, which we exploit to improve robustness of our prescribed patrols and increase detection of snares by an average of 30%. We evaluate our approach on real-world historical poaching data from Murchison Falls and Queen Elizabeth National Parks in Uganda and, for the first time, Srepok Wildlife Sanctuary in Cambodia. (ii) We present the results of large-scale field tests conducted in Murchison Falls and Srepok Wildlife Sanctuary which confirm that the predictive power of PAWS extends promisingly to multiple parks. This paper is part of an effort to expand PAWS to 800 parks around the world through integration with SMART conservation software.

[1]  Bing Liu,et al.  Learning with Positive and Unlabeled Examples Using Weighted Logistic Regression , 2003, ICML.

[2]  Bo An,et al.  PROTECT: a deployed game theoretic system to protect the ports of the United States , 2012, AAMAS.

[3]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Solving Stackelberg games with uncertain observability , 2011, AAMAS.

[4]  Long Tran-Thanh,et al.  Don't Put All Your Strategies in One Basket: Playing Green Security Games with Imperfect Prior Knowledge , 2019, AAMAS.

[5]  Trevor J. Hastie,et al.  Confidence intervals for random forests: the jackknife and the infinitesimal jackknife , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Seetha Hari,et al.  Learning From Imbalanced Data , 2019, Advances in Computer and Electrical Engineering.

[7]  Milind Tambe,et al.  "A Game of Thrones": When Human Behavior Models Compete in Repeated Stackelberg Security Games , 2015, AAMAS.

[8]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Robust Protection of Fisheries with COmPASS , 2014, AAAI.

[9]  Rong Yang,et al.  Adaptive resource allocation for wildlife protection against illegal poachers , 2014, AAMAS.

[10]  Wenkai Li,et al.  A Positive and Unlabeled Learning Algorithm for One-Class Classification of Remote-Sensing Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Bo An,et al.  Deploying PAWS: Field Optimization of the Protection Assistant for Wildlife Security , 2016, AAAI.

[12]  H. Travers,et al.  From Poachers to Protectors: Engaging Local Communities in Solutions to Illegal Wildlife Trade , 2017 .

[13]  Lantao Yu,et al.  Deep Reinforcement Learning for Green Security Games with Real-Time Information , 2018, AAAI.

[14]  Milind Tambe,et al.  When Security Games Go Green: Designing Defender Strategies to Prevent Poaching and Illegal Fishing , 2015, IJCAI.

[15]  A. Plumptre,et al.  Spatiotemporal trends of illegal activities from ranger‐collected data in a Ugandan national park , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  Andrew J. Plumptre,et al.  Improving Law‐Enforcement Effectiveness and Efficiency in Protected Areas Using Ranger‐collected Monitoring Data , 2017 .

[17]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Patrol Strategies to Maximize Pristine Forest Area , 2012, AAAI.

[18]  Fernando Nogueira,et al.  Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning , 2016, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[20]  Greg L. Warchol The Transnational Illegal Wildlife Trade , 2004 .

[21]  Milind Tambe,et al.  CAPTURE: A New Predictive Anti-Poaching Tool for Wildlife Protection , 2016, AAMAS.

[22]  Haifeng Xu,et al.  Optimal Patrol Planning for Green Security Games with Black-Box Attackers , 2017, GameSec.

[23]  Chee Keong Kwoh,et al.  Positive-unlabeled learning for disease gene identification , 2012, Bioinform..

[24]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Taking It for a Test Drive: A Hybrid Spatio-Temporal Model for Wildlife Poaching Prediction Evaluated Through a Controlled Field Test , 2017, ECML/PKDD.

[25]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Adversary Models Account for Imperfect Crime Data: Forecasting and Planning against Real-world Poachers , 2018, AAMAS.

[26]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Cloudy with a Chance of Poaching: Adversary Behavior Modeling and Forecasting with Real-World Poaching Data , 2017, AAMAS.

[27]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Security and Game Theory - Algorithms, Deployed Systems, Lessons Learned , 2011 .

[28]  Sam M. Ferreira,et al.  Continent-wide survey reveals massive decline in African savannah elephants , 2016, PeerJ.

[29]  T. Gray,et al.  A framework for assessing readiness for tiger Panthera tigris reintroduction: a case study from eastern Cambodia , 2017, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[30]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Divide to Defend: Collusive Security Games , 2016, GameSec.