A Review of Some Innovative Teaching Concepts and Methods Used in the Field of Veterinary Medical Education

Ongoing global developments affecting knowledge generation, information expansion, societal changes, and the changes in the practice of the veterinary medical profession provoke new expectations, and consequently a serious change in education and training. Veterinary medical education must respond to these new challenges, and is expected to make veterinary medical practice safer and better. In this paper we reviewed some of the innovative teaching concepts, methods, and tools which are currently known in the field of veterinary medical education, and the results they have had in a real veterinary medical teaching environment. To improve the teaching of veterinary medicine, several innovative educational/learning concepts and methods were employed, modified, developed, and applied. This study reports on the major new methods and concepts, describe their principles, outline the results of testing and applications in real-life circumstances, and describe their advantages and disadvantages related to veterinary medical teaching, and students’ attitudes towards them. In addition, this paper briefly introduces instructional design as the main factor that must be re-evaluated, and explains why learning outcomes must be developed and assessed to take advantage of innovative concepts and methods in teaching and curricula design. The study proposes that a combination of these innovative teaching methods is expected to have better learning outcomes needed in the field of veterinary medical education. Recommendations, including integration in the curriculum of team-based learning, peer instruction, and service learning, were put forward in this paper for consideration of all concerned.

[1]  L. Ragan The role of faculty in distance education: the same but different. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[2]  R. J. Repique Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[3]  Evaluation of student attitudes to cooperative learning in undergraduate veterinary medicine. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[4]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment , 2001 .

[5]  Barbara L. Gonzalez,et al.  Sharing science: characteristics of effective scientist-teacher interactions. , 2002, Advances in physiology education.

[6]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Developing interactive course Web sites for distance education and characteristics of students enrolled in distance learning courses. , 2003, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[7]  Barbara Zamorski,et al.  Research-led Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A case , 2002 .

[8]  Terry Poulton,et al.  Evaluating a Second Life Problem-Based Learning (PBL) demonstrator project: what can we learn? , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[9]  Geneva Keene Acor "Blended" online technology: maximizing instructor reach. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[10]  S. Forrester My journey from teaching to learning excellence. , 2006, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[11]  T. Barrett The problem‐based learning process as finding and being in flow , 2010 .

[12]  Laura K Molgaard,et al.  Using a wireless response system to enhance student learning. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[13]  C. Dhein Current perspectives on distance education in veterinary medicine. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[14]  S. Baillie,et al.  Piloting interprofessional education interventions with veterinary and veterinary nursing students. , 2011, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[15]  Wayne Hodgins Distance education but beyond: "meLearning"--what if the impossible isn't? , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[16]  M. Bradshaw,et al.  Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing and Related Health Professions , 2014 .

[17]  Lars Uhlin,et al.  Self-directed learning – a learning issue for students and faculty! , 2008 .

[18]  N. Foster,et al.  Assessing the influence of gender, learning style, and pre-entry experience on student response to delivery of a novel veterinary curriculum. , 2010, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[19]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Educating the Net Generation , 2005 .

[20]  M. Khalil,et al.  Evaluation of cognitive loads imposed by traditional paper-based and innovative computer-based instructional strategies. , 2010, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[21]  P. Romano,et al.  Virtual international experiences in veterinary medicine: an evaluation of students' attitudes toward computer-based learning. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[22]  Gary W. Matkin Distance education: its concepts and constructs. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[23]  P. Mills,et al.  A comparison of responses to group learning between first-year Asian and first-year Australian veterinary science students. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[24]  Lorraine Toews,et al.  The information infrastructure that supports evidence-based veterinary medicine: a comparison with human medicine. , 2011, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[25]  M. Newman,et al.  Problem Based Learning: an introduction and overview of the key features of the approach. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[26]  T. V. Fossum,et al.  Attitudes of veterinary medical students and medical students toward collaborative learning: an experiment. , 2004, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education.

[27]  Phyllis Blumberg,et al.  Why self-directed learning is not learned and practiced in veterinary education. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[28]  Terry Barrett,et al.  Learning about the problem in problem-based learning (PBL) by listening to students’ talk in tutorials: a critical discourse analysis study , 2013 .

[29]  V. Fajt,et al.  Practicing the skills of evidence-based veterinary medicine through case-based pharmacology rounds. , 2009, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[30]  T. Bernardo Harnessing collective knowledge to create global public goods for education and health. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[31]  David A Cook,et al.  Web-based learning a systematic review of the variability of interventions , 2011 .

[32]  B. Rush,et al.  The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom. , 2010, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[33]  Gary Brown,et al.  Use of the virtual ventilator, a screen-based computer simulation, to teach the principles of mechanical ventilation. , 2009, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[34]  T. Bernardo,et al.  Progress in the capture, manipulation, and delivery of medical media and its impact on education, clinical care, and research. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[35]  C. Fuentealba,et al.  Relationships between admissions requirements and pre-clinical and clinical performance in a distributed veterinary curriculum. , 2011, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[36]  D. Gill,et al.  Introducing peer-assisted learning into a veterinary curriculum: a trial with a simulator. , 2009, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[37]  G. Pinchbeck,et al.  Teaching veterinary radiography by e-learning versus structured tutorial: a randomized, single-blinded controlled trial. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[38]  Elizabeth A. Lane Problem-based learning in veterinary education. , 2008, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[39]  V. L. Clegg,et al.  Group learning improves case analysis in veterinary medicine. , 2002, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[40]  L. Mossop,et al.  I'll show you mine if you show me yours! Portfolio design in two UK veterinary schools. , 2008, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[41]  N. Pelaez,et al.  Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology. , 2002, Advances in physiology education.

[42]  M. Bellingham,et al.  Using group learning to promote integration and cooperative learning between Asian and Australian second-year veterinary science students. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[43]  R. Kemm,et al.  Scientific principles of education research: Experimental Biology 2007. , 2007, Advances in physiology education.

[44]  V. Dale,et al.  Ten years of CLIVE (Computer-Aided Learning in Veterinary Education) in the United Kingdom. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[45]  Robert L Bill Purdue University's Veterinary Technology Distance Learning Program. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[46]  G. Salmon,et al.  Veterinary e-CPD: a new model for providing online continuing professional development for the veterinary profession. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[47]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[48]  Michael W Sanderson,et al.  Comparison of student performance after lecture-based and case-based/problem-based teaching in a large group. , 2008, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[49]  K. Gough,et al.  Confidence as a barrier to the use of problem-based learning in veterinary undergraduate students. , 2011, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[50]  Mildred A. Hoover,et al.  Blood circulation laboratory investigations with video are less investigative than instructional blood circulation laboratories with live organisms. , 2008, Advances in physiology education.

[51]  H S Barrows,et al.  A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods , 1986, Medical education.

[52]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teaching basic medical sciences at a distance: strategies for effective teaching and learning in internet-based courses. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.