Determination of Forming Limits in Sheet Metal Forming Using Deep Learning

The forming limit curve (FLC) is used to model the onset of sheet metal instability during forming processes e.g., in the area of finite element analysis, and is usually determined by evaluation of strain distributions, derived with optical measurement systems during Nakajima tests. Current methods comprise of the standardized DIN EN ISO 12004-2 or time-dependent approaches that heuristically limit the evaluation area to a fraction of the available information and show weaknesses in the context of brittle materials without a pronounced necking phase. To address these limitations, supervised and unsupervised pattern recognition methods were introduced recently. However, these approaches are still dependent on prior knowledge, time, and localization information. This study overcomes these limitations by adopting a Siamese convolutional neural network (CNN), as a feature extractor. Suitable features are automatically learned using the extreme cases of the homogeneous and inhomogeneous forming phase in a supervised setup. Using robust Student’s t mixture models, the learned features are clustered into three distributions in an unsupervised manner that cover the complete forming process. Due to the location and time independency of the method, the knowledge learned from formed specimen up until fracture can be transferred on to other forming processes that were prematurely stopped and assessed using metallographic examinations, enabling probabilistic cluster membership assignments for each frame of the forming sequence. The generalization of the method to unseen materials is evaluated in multiple experiments, and additionally tested on an aluminum alloy AA5182, which is characterized by Portevin-LE Chatlier effects.

[1]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction by Learning an Invariant Mapping , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[2]  Christian Riess,et al.  Automatic Classification of Defective Photovoltaic Module Cells in Electroluminescence Images , 2018, Solar Energy.

[3]  Andreas Maier,et al.  Analysis of Forming Limits in Sheet Metal Forming with Pattern Recognition Methods. Part 1: Characterization of Onset of Necking and Expert Evaluation , 2018, Materials.

[4]  Heinrich Niemann,et al.  Klassifikation von Mustern , 1983 .

[5]  Affronti Emanuela,et al.  Metallographic Analysis of Nakajima Tests for the Evaluation of the Failure Developments , 2017 .

[6]  Aristidis Likas,et al.  The mixtures of Student's t-distributions as a robust framework for rigid registration , 2009, Image Vis. Comput..

[7]  Nassir Navab,et al.  X-ray-transform Invariant Anatomical Landmark Detection for Pelvic Trauma Surgery , 2018, MICCAI.

[8]  Marion Merklein,et al.  Metallographic analysis of failure mechanisms during Nakajima tests for the evaluation of forming limits on a dual-phase steel , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[9]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[10]  Marion Merklein,et al.  A New Approach to the Evaluation of Forming Limits in Sheet Metal Forming , 2015 .

[11]  Jun Wang,et al.  Unexpected Event Prediction in Wire Electrical Discharge Machining Using Deep Learning Techniques , 2018, Materials.

[12]  Andreas K. Maier,et al.  A Deep Learning Architecture for Limited-Angle Computed Tomography Reconstruction , 2017, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[13]  R. Arrieux,et al.  Determination of the Forming Limit Diagrams Using Image Analysis by the Corelation Method , 1999 .

[14]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Robust mixture modelling using the t distribution , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[15]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Andreas Maier,et al.  Analysis of Forming Limits in Sheet Metal Forming with Pattern Recognition Methods. Part 2: Unsupervised Methodology and Application , 2018, Materials.

[17]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[18]  Yuan Yu,et al.  TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.

[19]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Support Vector Method for Novelty Detection , 1999, NIPS.

[20]  Q. M. Jonathan Wu,et al.  Robust Student's-t Mixture Model With Spatial Constraints and Its Application in Medical Image Segmentation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Andreas K. Maier,et al.  Deep Learning Computed Tomography , 2016, MICCAI.

[22]  Pavel Hora,et al.  New algorithm for a robust user-independent evaluation of beginning instability for the experimental FLC determination , 2011 .

[23]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[24]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Robust Non-rigid Registration Through Agent-Based Action Learning , 2017, MICCAI.

[26]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[27]  Ahmet Yilmaz,et al.  The Portevin–Le Chatelier effect: a review of experimental findings , 2011, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[28]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.