Reading the mobile brain: from laboratory to real-world electroencephalography

It is increasingly viable to measure the brain activity of mobile users, as they go about their everyday business in their natural world environment. This is due to: (i) modern signal processing methods, (ii) lightweight and cost-effective measurement devices, and (iii) a better, albeit incomplete, understanding of how measurable brain activity relates to mental processes. Here, we address how brain activity can be measured in mobile users and how this contrasts with measurements obtained under controlled laboratory conditions. In particular, we will focus on electroencephalography (EEG) and will cover: (i) hardware and software implementation, (ii) signal processing techniques, (iii) interpretation of EEG measurements. This will consist of hands-on analyses of real EEG data and a basic theoretical introduction to how and why EEG works.

[1]  Esther Rodriguez-Villegas,et al.  Wearable Electroencephalography , 2010, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[2]  S. Debener,et al.  Concealed, Unobtrusive Ear-Centered EEG Acquisition: cEEGrids for Transparent EEG , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Wearable functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): expanding vistas for neurocognitive augmentation , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[4]  S. Herculano‐Houzel The Human Brain in Numbers: A Linearly Scaled-up Primate Brain , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Stéphane Bonnet,et al.  Mental fatigue and working memory load estimation: Interaction and implications for EEG-based passive BCI , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  Lewis L. Chuang,et al.  Using EEG to Understand why Behavior to Auditory In-vehicle Notifications Differs Across Test Environments , 2017, AutomotiveUI.

[7]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Steering Demands Diminish the Early-P3, Late-P3 and RON Components of the Event-Related Potential of Task-Irrelevant Environmental Sounds , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  Scott Makeig,et al.  BCILAB: a platform for brain–computer interface development , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  In-Ear EEG From Viscoelastic Generic Earpieces: Robust and Unobtrusive 24/7 Monitoring , 2016, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[10]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  Marco Ferrari,et al.  A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  Albrecht Schmidt Biosignals in human-computer interaction , 2016, Interactions.

[13]  S. Debener,et al.  How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk? , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Implicit human computer interaction through context , 2000, Personal Technologies.

[15]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Dry-Contact and Noncontact Biopotential Electrodes: Methodological Review , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.