A framework of information visualization for multi-system construction

Abstract Modern buildings usually include multiple systems such as air-conditioning (AC), water supply and gas pipes, sanitary lines, telecommunication systems and security networks. Because these systems are highly interdependent, conventional methods for presenting information, typically a 3D model and a schedule, are insufficient to effectively manage and coordinate various experts working on a project. This research proposes a framework that enables engineers to explore and interact with the information visually. It includes four information views (temporal, hierarchical, relational and spatial), four interaction functions (information exploration, cross-highlighting, time controller, and information extraction) and two display layouts (matrix hardware layout and flexible software layout). A prototype system called Construction Dashboard was implemented following this framework. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework we conducted a user test (N = 30) using an example project involving four systems (power, AC, water and computer). Each user answered nine questions related to different management and coordination problems by employing both Construction Dashboard and the conventional method (3D model with a schedule). The results showed that the completion times, for each of the nine questions, to solve these questions are significantly faster when using Construction Dashboard. The success rates to obtain the correct answers are also significantly better in three of the nine questions.

[1]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Focused Sharing of Information for Multidisciplinary Decision Making by Project Teams , 2001, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[2]  Tanaya Korde Visualization of construction data , 2005 .

[3]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Compatibility issues in Augmented Reality systems for AEC: An experimental prototype study , 2006 .

[4]  Sheryl Staub-French,et al.  3D and 4D modeling for design and construction coordination: issues and lessons learned , 2007, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[5]  Eddy M. Rojas,et al.  Visualization of Project Control Data: A Research Agenda , 2007 .

[6]  Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  Designing Internet-Based Payment Systems: Guidelines and Empirical Basis , 2009, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Unique Requirements of Building Information Modeling for Cast-in-Place Reinforced Concrete , 2009 .

[8]  Spiro N. Pollalis,et al.  3D model-based collaboration in design development and construction of complex shaped buildings , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[9]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Browsing hierarchical data with multi-level dynamic queries and pruning , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Anthony D. Songer,et al.  Construction scheduling using 3‐D CAD and walk‐thru , 2001 .

[11]  David R. Riley,et al.  Benefit-Cost Metrics for Design Coordination of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Systems in Multistory Buildings , 2005 .

[12]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Knowledge and Reasoning for MEP Coordination , 2003 .

[13]  Tanaya Korde,et al.  Visual representation of construction management data , 2009 .

[14]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  TreePlus: Interactive Exploration of Networks with Enhanced Tree Layouts , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Shih-Chung Kang,et al.  Systematic procedure of determining an ideal color scheme on 4D models , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[16]  Bonsang Koo,et al.  Feasibility study of 4D CAD in commercial construction , 2002 .

[17]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  Supporting Project Meetings with Concurrent Interoperability in a Construction Information Workspace , 2005, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[18]  James T. Enns,et al.  Perception and Painting: A Search for Effective, Engaging Visualizations , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[19]  Adam Nathan,et al.  Windows Presentation Foundation Unleashed , 2006 .

[20]  M. Anson,et al.  4D Dynamic Construction Management and Visualization Software: 2. Site Trial , 2005 .

[21]  S. Keoki. Sears,et al.  Construction Project Management , 1972 .

[22]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Teaching human- computer interaction in context: An illustrative lesson on windows , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[23]  John Q. Walker,et al.  A node‐positioning algorithm for general trees , 1990, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[24]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Direct Manipulation Interfaces , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  Stuart D. Anderson,et al.  Empirical Study on the Merit of Web-Based 4D Visualization in Collaborative Construction Planning and Scheduling , 2007 .

[26]  Syed M. Ahmed,et al.  Construction Coordination Activities: What Is Important and What Consumes Time , 2001 .

[27]  Nashwan Dawood,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of 4D planning as a valuable communication tool , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[28]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Generating, evaluating and visualizing construction schedules with CAD tools , 1998 .

[29]  Harry Jamieson,et al.  Visual Communication: More than Meets the Eye , 2007 .

[30]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Designing and Evaluating Visualization Techniques for Construction Planning , 2000 .

[31]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[32]  John I. Messner,et al.  Case studies in BIM implementation for programming of healthcare facilities , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[33]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Four-dimensional visualization of construction scheduling and site utilization , 2004 .

[34]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Integrating Physical and Digital Interactions on Walls for Fluid Design Collaboration , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[35]  M Stone,et al.  Multi-stakeholder collaboration: The CIFE iRoom , 2002 .

[36]  Nashwan Dawood,et al.  The Value of Visual 4D Planning in the UK Construction Industry , 2006, EG-ICE.

[37]  Deborah Hix,et al.  Graphical encoding for information visualization: an empirical study , 2002, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002. INFOVIS 2002..

[38]  Edward J. Jaselskis,et al.  Approaches to Improving the Quality of Construction Drawings from Owner's Perspective , 2006 .

[39]  A. Fox,et al.  Integrating information appliances into an interactive workspace , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[40]  Pavan Meadati,et al.  Integrating Construction Process Documentation into Building Information Modeling , 2008 .

[41]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  The Impact of Tangible User Interfaces on Designers' Spatial Cognition , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Requirements and Benefits of Interactive Information Workspaces in Construction , 2000 .

[43]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Benefits and lessons learned of implementing building virtual design and construction (VDC) technologies for coordination of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems on a large healthcare project , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[44]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[45]  Chris North,et al.  Multidimensional visualization of project control data , 2004 .

[46]  Ning Gu,et al.  An empirical case study on designer's perceptions of augmented reality within an architectural firm , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[47]  Sheryl Staub-French,et al.  Requirements For A Mobile Interactive Workspace To Support Design Development And Coordination , 2006 .