Learning declarative and procedural knowledge via video lectures: cognitive load and learning effectiveness

Abstract Video lectures are being widely used in online and blended learning classes worldwide, and their learning effectiveness is becoming a focus of many educators and researchers. This study examined the cognitive load and learning effectiveness of video lectures in terms of the type of knowledge being taught (declarative or procedural) and instructor visibility. Video lectures with and without an instructor were used to teach each type of knowledge. Sixty Chinese undergraduates were randomly assigned to two of the four lectures. They completed a cognitive load questionnaire and learning tests after viewing the lectures. The results of t-tests revealed that adding the instructor in a video lecture increased learners’ cognitive load only when learning procedural knowledge; adding the instructor only facilitated declarative knowledge learning. The results suggest that the learning effectiveness of video lectures varies depending on the type of knowledge being taught and the presence or absence of an instructor.

[1]  Philip J. Guo,et al.  How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos , 2014, L@S.

[2]  Jennifer L. Hill,et al.  New technology, new pedagogy? Employing video podcasts in learning and teaching about exotic ecosystems , 2011 .

[3]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .

[4]  Stephen Reysen,et al.  Video lecture format, student technological efficacy, and social presence in online courses , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Pep Simo,et al.  Low-Cost educational videos' for engineering students: a new concept based on video streaming and Youtube channels , 2011 .

[6]  Jianzhong Hong,et al.  Learning process and learning outcomes of video podcasts including the instructor and PPT slides: a Chinese case , 2016 .

[7]  Philip Molebash,et al.  Promoting Equity with Digital Video. In the Curriculum: Science. , 2004 .

[8]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[10]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[11]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Effects of Different Video Lecture Types on Sustained Attention, Emotion, Cognitive Load, and Learning Performance , 2015, IIAI-AAI.

[12]  Jared Danielson,et al.  Is the effectiveness of lecture capture related to teaching approach or content type? , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Konstantinos Chorianopoulos,et al.  Investigating Differences among the Commonly Used Video Lecture Styles , 2013 .

[14]  René F. Kizilcec,et al.  Showing face in video instruction: effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect , 2014, CHI.

[15]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning : Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles , 2005 .

[16]  K. Scherer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage : A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 2004 .

[17]  R. Mayer.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Principles of Multimedia Learning Based on Social Cues : Personalization, Voice, and Image Principles , 2005 .

[18]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[19]  Greg M. Winslett,et al.  What counts as educational video?: Working toward best practice alignment between video production approaches and outcomes. , 2014 .

[20]  René F. Kizilcec,et al.  The instructor’s face in video instruction: Evidence from two large-scale field studies. , 2015, Journal of Educational Psychology.