A Gradient-based Sensitivity Analysis Method for Complex Systems

Most sensitivity analysis methods from literature impose specific experiment plans (design-of-experiments). Moreover, the size of the experiment plan, which is in conjunction with the number of system evaluations, increases with the number of factors that may affect the systems’ behavior. This paper introduces a gradient-based global sensitivity analysis method which overcomes these limitations. First, its performance is compared against six sensitivity analysis methods on sets of polynomial test functions. The comparison is carried out by means of the number of system evaluations implied and the reported factor ranking list. The proposed method proved to have comparable accuracy to the best of the six known methods- the EFAST method- with the advantage of a lower number of system evaluations. These two methods are further applied on an electronic system, an E-Bike application. In this case, the proposed method employs the verification plan of the EFAST method, as well as a standard Monte Carlo experiment plan with about one third of the system evaluations of the EFAST. Even with a much lower number of system evaluations, the proposed method yields the same result as the EFAST method in terms of the factor ranking list.

[1]  Andi Buzo,et al.  On the influence of angle sensor nonidealities on the torque ripple in PMSM systems — An analytical approach , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD).

[2]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[3]  Wei Tian,et al.  A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis , 2013 .

[4]  Marc B Neumann,et al.  Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for pollutant degradation modelling: a case study from drinking water treatment. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[6]  D. Hamby A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[7]  Andi Buzo,et al.  COMPARISON OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS METHODS IN HIGH-DIMENSIONAL VERIFICATION SPACES , 2016 .

[8]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[9]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting , 1988 .

[10]  Andi Buzo,et al.  A novel entropy-based sensitivity analysis approach for complex systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[11]  Veronica Czitrom,et al.  One-Factor-at-a-Time versus Designed Experiments , 1999 .

[12]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Liviu Goras,et al.  Simulation-based approach to application fitness for an E-Bike , 2016, 2016 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[14]  Henrik Brohus,et al.  Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings , 2009 .

[15]  Sigrid Reiter,et al.  A performance comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for building energy models , 2015 .

[16]  Lai Wei,et al.  Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods in Building Energy Assessment , 2016 .

[17]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[19]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.