Weight of evidence evaluation and systematic review in EU chemical risk assessment: Foundation is laid but guidance is needed.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ettore Capri,et al. Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters , 2013 .
[2] Christina Rudén. From data to decision : A case study of controversies in cancer risk assessment , 2002 .
[3] Tracey J. Woodruff,et al. The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Systematic Review of Human Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.
[4] Christina Rudén,et al. Evaluation of the accuracy and consistency of the Swedish environmental classification and information system for pharmaceuticals. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.
[5] Colin Ockleford. Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters , 2013 .
[6] Gábor L. Lövei,et al. Application of Systematic Review Methodology to Food and Feed Safety Assessments to Support Decision Making , 2010 .
[7] Richard David Evans,et al. State of the art assessment of endocrine disruptors: Final Report , 2011 .
[8] Marlene Ågerstrand,et al. Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations. , 2016, Environment international.
[9] Åke Bergman,et al. State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012 , 2012 .
[10] Richard A. Becker,et al. A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses , 2013, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[11] Linda Schenk,et al. Comparison of Data Used for Setting Occupational Exposure Limits , 2010, International journal of occupational and environmental health.
[12] Andreas Kortenkamp,et al. Response to A critique of the European Commission Document, “State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters” by Rhomberg and colleagues – letter to the editor , 2012, Critical reviews in toxicology.
[13] U. Tillmann,et al. A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[14] A. Zuckerman,et al. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans , 1995, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.
[15] John R. Bucher,et al. Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.
[16] A. Hanberg,et al. Bridging the gap between academic research and regulatory health risk assessment of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. , 2014, Current opinion in pharmacology.
[17] Anna Beronius,et al. Risk to all or none? A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A. , 2010, Reproductive toxicology.
[18] D. Weed. Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[19] Sheldon Krimsky,et al. The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law. , 2005, American journal of public health.
[20] Division on Earth. Review of Epa's Integrated Risk Information System (Iris) Process , 2014 .
[21] Igor Linkov,et al. Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.
[22] It Istituto Superiore di Sanit,et al. Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document on euthrophication assessment in the context of European water policies. (Technical report 2009-030; Guidance document 23) , 2009 .