Weight of evidence evaluation and systematic review in EU chemical risk assessment: Foundation is laid but guidance is needed.

The aim of this review was to investigate if and how the application of weight of evidence (WoE) evaluation or systematic review (SR) in chemical risk assessment is promoted within different regulatory frameworks in the European Union. Legislative and relevant guidance documents within nine regulatory frameworks were scrutinized and compared. WoE evaluation or SR is promoted in seven of the investigated frameworks but sufficient guidance for how to perform these processes is generally lacking. None of the investigated frameworks give enough guidance for generating robust and reproducible WoE evaluations or SRs. In conclusion, the foundation for use of WoE evaluation and SR is laid in the majority of the investigated frameworks, but there is a need to provide more structured and detailed guidance. In order to make the process of developing guidance as efficient as possible, and to ensure smooth transfer of risk assessment's between frameworks if a chemical is risk assessed both as, for example, a biocide and an industrial chemical, it is recommended that guidance is developed jointly by the European regulatory agencies.

[1]  Ettore Capri,et al.  Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters , 2013 .

[2]  Christina Rudén.  From data to decision : A case study of controversies in cancer risk assessment , 2002 .

[3]  Tracey J. Woodruff,et al.  The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Systematic Review of Human Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  Christina Rudén,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy and consistency of the Swedish environmental classification and information system for pharmaceuticals. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Colin Ockleford.  Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters , 2013 .

[6]  Gábor L. Lövei,et al.  Application of Systematic Review Methodology to Food and Feed Safety Assessments to Support Decision Making , 2010 .

[7]  Richard David Evans,et al.  State of the art assessment of endocrine disruptors: Final Report , 2011 .

[8]  Marlene Ågerstrand,et al.  Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations. , 2016, Environment international.

[9]  Åke Bergman,et al.  State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012 , 2012 .

[10]  Richard A. Becker,et al.  A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses , 2013, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[11]  Linda Schenk,et al.  Comparison of Data Used for Setting Occupational Exposure Limits , 2010, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[12]  Andreas Kortenkamp,et al.  Response to A critique of the European Commission Document, “State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters” by Rhomberg and colleagues – letter to the editor , 2012, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[13]  U. Tillmann,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[14]  A. Zuckerman,et al.  IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans , 1995, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[15]  John R. Bucher,et al.  Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  A. Hanberg,et al.  Bridging the gap between academic research and regulatory health risk assessment of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. , 2014, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[17]  Anna Beronius,et al.  Risk to all or none? A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A. , 2010, Reproductive toxicology.

[18]  D. Weed.  Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Sheldon Krimsky,et al.  The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[20]  Division on Earth.  Review of Epa's Integrated Risk Information System (Iris) Process , 2014 .

[21]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  It Istituto Superiore di Sanit,et al.  Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document on euthrophication assessment in the context of European water policies. (Technical report 2009-030; Guidance document 23) , 2009 .