Incorporating metamorphism in geodynamic models: the mass conservation problem

SUMMARY Geodynamic models incorporating metamorphic phase transformations almost invariably assume the validity of the Boussinesq approximation that violates conservation of mass. In such models metamorphic density changes take place without volumetric effects. We assess the impact of the Boussinesq approximation by comparing models of orogeny accompanied by lower crustal eclogitization both with and without the approximation. Our results demonstrate that the approximation may cause errors approaching 100 per cent in characteristic measures of orogenic shape. Mass conservation errors in Boussinesq models amplify with model time. Mass conservative models of metamorphism are therefore essential to understand long-term tectonic evolution and to assess the importance of the different geodynamic processes.

[1]  James A. D. Connolly,et al.  The geodynamic equation of state: What and how , 2009 .

[2]  C. Beaumont,et al.  Formation and exhumation of ultra‐high‐pressure rocks during continental collision: Role of detachment in the subduction channel , 2008 .

[3]  J. Avouac,et al.  Erosion as a driving mechanism of intracontinental mountain growth , 1996 .

[4]  James A. D. Connolly,et al.  Computation of phase equilibria by linear programming: A tool for geodynamic modeling and its application to subduction zone decarbonation , 2005 .

[5]  Jérôme Vergne,et al.  Seismic velocities in Southern Tibet lower crust: a receiver function approach for eclogite detection , 2009 .

[6]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Earthquake stress drops, ambient tectonic stresses and stresses that drive plate motions , 1977 .

[7]  David A. Yuen,et al.  Robust characteristics method for modelling multiphase visco-elasto-plastic thermo-mechanical problems , 2007 .

[8]  M. Doin,et al.  Influence of the precollisional stage on subduction dynamics and the buried crust thermal state: Insights from numerical simulations , 2007 .

[9]  L. Jolivet,et al.  Burial and exhumation in a subduction wedge: Mutual constraints from thermomechanical modeling and natural P‐T‐t data (Schistes Lustrés, western Alps) , 2007 .

[10]  Y. Podladchikov,et al.  Effect of mineral phase transitions on sedimentary basin subsidence and uplift , 2005 .

[11]  Jérôme Vergne,et al.  The effective elastic thickness of the India Plate from receiver function imaging, gravity anomalies and thermomechanical modelling , 2006 .

[12]  L. Jolivet,et al.  A thermomechanical model of exhumation of high pressure (HP) and ultra-high pressure (UHP) metamorphic rocks in Alpine-type collision belts , 2001 .

[13]  R. Müller,et al.  Fragmentation of active continental plate margins owing to the buoyancy of the mantle wedge , 2010 .

[14]  R. Cattin,et al.  Erosional control on the dynamics of low-convergence rate continental plateau margins , 2009 .

[15]  A. Holmes,et al.  Principles of Physical Geology , 1965 .

[16]  C. Thieulot,et al.  DOUAR: A new three-dimensional creeping flow numerical model for the solution of geological problems , 2008 .

[17]  M. Rabinowicz,et al.  Three‐dimensional infinite Prandtl number convection in one and two layers with implications for the Earth's gravity field , 1988 .

[18]  Lin‐gun Liu High-pressure phase transformations of albite, jadeite and nepheline , 1978 .

[19]  R. Cattin,et al.  Numerical modelling of erosion processes in the Himalayas of Nepal: effects of spatial variations of rock strength and precipitation , 2006, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[20]  J. Avouac,et al.  Gravity anomalies, crustal structure and thermo-mechanical support of the Himalaya of Central Nepal , 2001 .

[21]  A. Poliakov,et al.  Initiation of salt diapirs with frictional overburdens: numerical experiments , 1993 .

[22]  C. Scholz The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting , 1990 .

[23]  L. Bollinger,et al.  Density distribution of the India plate beneath the Tibetan plateau: Geophysical and petrological constraints on the kinetics of lower-crustal eclogitization , 2007 .