Who Does the Public Trust? The Case of Genetically Modified Food in the United States

Trust is important for the perception of many types of risk, including those relating to genetically modified (GM) food. Who the public trusts in any given circumstance, however, is not well understood. In this study of public trust regarding GM food, an exploratory factor analysis with Promax rotation reveals public classification of three common institutional types-evaluators, watchdogs, and merchants. The structure of relationships among these stakeholders can act to enable or constrain public support for this new technology. Evaluators-scientists, universities, and medical professionals-are the most trusted. Watchdogs-consumer advocacy organizations, environmental organizations, and media sources-are moderately trusted. Merchants-grocers and grocery stores, industry, and farmers-are least trusted. While the federal government is seen as closest to being an evaluator, it is not highly correlated with any of the factors. The lack of trust in the organizations with the greatest resources and responsibilities for ensuring the safety of GM food should be seen as an important obstacle to the adoption of the technology.

[1]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Branden B. Johnson,et al.  Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust , 1999 .

[3]  L. Zucker.  Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[4]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Michael Strauss.  :Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, and the Future of Food , 2002 .

[6]  R Shepherd,et al.  What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Diego Gambetta.  Can We Trust Trust , 2000 .

[8]  D. H. Mills.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[9]  Edna Einsiedel,et al.  GM Food Labeling , 2002 .

[10]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[11]  Elizabeth Robles.  Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal , 2002 .

[12]  Susanna Hornig Priest,et al.  The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology Across National Cultures as a Function of Trust in Actors , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. , 1971 .

[14]  Carol A. Heimer.  Solving the Problem of Trust , 2001 .

[15]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions , 1993 .

[16]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  A Grain of Truth: The Media, the Public, and Biotechnology , 2001 .

[17]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[18]  Eric Schlosser,et al.  Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal , 2001 .

[19]  Rachel Schurman,et al.  Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western Europe , 2004 .

[20]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[21]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  K. Erikson,et al.  Everything in Its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood , 1978 .

[23]  William K. Hallman,et al.  AMERICANS AND GM FOOD: KNOWLEDGE, OPINION AND INTEREST IN 2004 , 2004 .

[24]  M. Lawrence.  Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health , 2007 .

[25]  Daniel Charles.  Lords of the harvest : biotech, big money, and the future of food , 2001 .

[26]  V T Covello,et al.  The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  D. Mechanic,et al.  Public trust and initiatives for new health care partnerships. , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[28]  George Gaskell,et al.  Europeans and biotechnology in 2002 - Eurobarometer 58.0 : A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project "Life Sciences in European Society" , 2003 .

[29]  L. Clarke.  Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster , 1999 .

[30]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  G. Leopold.  The Federal Register. , 1979, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[32]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA , 1996 .

[33]  William K. Hallman,et al.  Public Perceptions Of Genetically Modified Foods: Americans Know Not What They Eat , 2002 .

[34]  Susan Miles,et al.  The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Mad cows, mad corn and mad communities: the role of socio-cultural factors in the perceived risk of genetically-modified food , 2002, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[36]  W. Hallman,et al.  PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: A NATIONAL STUDY OF AMERICAN KNOWLEDGE AND OPINION , 2003 .

[37]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[38]  W. Galston.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[39]  J. Kevin Vessey,et al.  First Fruit: The Creation of the Flavr Savr™ Tomato and the Birth of Biotech Foods.ByBelinda Martineau.New York: McGraw‐Hill. $24.95. xvii + 269 p; index. ISBN: 0–07–136056–5. 2001. , 2002 .

[40]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[41]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Social Trust and the Management of Risk , 2006 .