Distribution of peak expiratory flow variability by age, gender and smoking habits in a random population sample aged 20-70 yrs.

Peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability can be considered as an index of bronchial lability. Population studies on PEF variability are few. The purpose of the current paper is to describe the distribution of PEF variability in a random population sample of adults with a wide age range (20-70 yrs), and to assess relationships to age, gender and smoking habits. PEF data were collected in 511 participants of the Dutch part of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. A training effect was found, absolute PEF values on the first measurement day being significantly lower. Females had greater PEF variability (adjusted for age, height and pack-years) and lower absolute PEFs than males. The mean within-day variation (amplitude % mean) was 3.66% (SD 2.03%), whereas the mean day-to-day variation was relatively small: 0.08% (SD 1.53%). Absolute PEFs were lower and amplitude % mean were significantly higher in older age groups. Smoking was significantly associated with lower mean PEFs and greater amplitude % mean. We observed lower mean values of the amplitude % mean than other investigators, possibly related to lower frequency of PEF recording (twice daily). We conclude that PEF and PEF variability have a normal or log-normal distribution. When studying PEF variability, age, gender and smoking habits should be taken into account.

[1]  P. Burney,et al.  Factors affecting peak expiratory flow variability and bronchial reactivity in a random population sample. , 1993, Thorax.

[2]  P. Burney,et al.  Comparison of bronchial reactivity and peak expiratory flow variability measurements for epidemiologic studies. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[3]  F. Neukirch,et al.  Peak Expiratory Flow Variability and Bronchial Responsiveness to Methacholine , 1992 .

[4]  M. Lebowitz,et al.  The normal range of diurnal changes in peak expiratory flow rates. Relationship to symptoms and respiratory disease. , 1991, The American review of respiratory disease.

[5]  B. Sibbald,et al.  A general practice based survey of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and its relation to symptoms, sex, age, atopy, and smoking. , 1990, Thorax.

[6]  P. Burney,et al.  The distribution of peak expiratory flow variability in a population sample. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[7]  J. Schouten,et al.  The distribution of bronchial responsiveness to histamine in symptomatic and in asymptomatic subjects. A population-based analysis of various indices of responsiveness. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[8]  F. Speizer,et al.  Peak expiratory flow rate in an elderly population. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  A. Nunn,et al.  Peak expiratory flow in symptomless elderly smokers and ex-smokers. , 1989, BMJ.

[10]  F. Speizer,et al.  The relationship of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness to respiratory symptoms in a random population sample. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[11]  F. Hargreave,et al.  Interpretation of the variability of peak flow rates in chronic bronchitis. , 1986, Thorax.

[12]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Unimodal distribution of bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine in a random human population. , 1983, Chest.

[13]  F. Hargreave,et al.  Bronchial responsiveness to histamine: relationship to diurnal variation of peak flow rate, improvement after bronchodilator, and airway calibre , 1982, Thorax.

[14]  N. Thomson,et al.  Bronchial responsiveness to histamine or methacholine in asthma: measurement and clinical significance. , 1981, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[15]  M. Hetzel.  The pulmonary clock. , 1981, Thorax.

[16]  T J Clark,et al.  Comparison of normal and asthmatic circadian rhythms in peak expiratory flow rate. , 1980, Thorax.

[17]  C. Connolly.  Diurnal rhythms in airway obstruction. , 1979, British journal of diseases of the chest.