Envelope size tuning for stereo-depth perception of small and large disparities

Stereopsis is the sense of depth derived from binocular disparities that are formed between targets that are matched between the two retinal images. Binocular matches for sustained stereopsis are based on similarity of orientation, spatial frequency and contrast of the two retinal images whereas matches for transient stereopsis depend on these parameters to a very limited extent. In this investigation we have tested the possibility that transient stereopsis forms matches between objects of similar overall size. The tuning of sustained and transient stereopsis to contrast-envelope size was investigated by presenting narrow-band Gabor targets of unequal size to the two eyes. Bandwidth for envelope-size tuning was estimated from the range of dichoptic size-differences over which stereo performance remained above chance level. An equal bandwidth of 2 octaves was found for the sustained and transient stereo systems when stimulated with parallel orientation Gabors that subtended a small disparity. Sustained-stereo performance with orthogonal carriers was reduced with large envelope sizes. Bandwidth of the transient stereo system increased to 3 octaves when tested with a larger disparity stimulus and it was independent of carrier orientation. Reducing the contrast of the larger-size Gabor improved transient-stereo performance from near chance (48-58%) to 85-95%. Thus the bandwidth for envelope-size tuning is much broader than indicated with equal physical contrast stimuli. The observed tuning to envelope size, while broad, is tighter than that observed for carrier spatial-frequency [Vis. Res. 38 (1998) 3057], carrier orientation [Vis. Res. 39 (1999) 2717] and contrast polarity [Vis. Res. 39 (1999) 4010] of the stimulus. Thus it would appear that envelope size and, to a greater extent, temporal synchrony of the dichoptic stimuli [Perception 24 (1995) 33] are the primary means for selecting matched binocular inputs for transient stereopsis.

[1]  G. Sperling,et al.  Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  David R. Pope,et al.  Extraction of depth from opposite-contrast stimuli: transient system can, sustained system can’t , 1999, Vision Research.

[3]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Scale selection for second-order (non-linear) stereopsis , 1997, Vision Research.

[4]  R. Hess,et al.  D max for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content , 1995, Vision Research.

[5]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[6]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Linear and non-linear filtering in stereopsis , 1994, Vision Research.

[7]  R Blake,et al.  Binocular Disparity Processing with Opposite-Contrast Stimuli , 1995, Perception.

[8]  H. Wilson,et al.  Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  C. Blakemore,et al.  A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Fullerton.  Psychology and physiology. , 1896 .

[12]  A J Parker,et al.  Binocular disparity processing with opposite-contrast stimuli. , 1995 .

[13]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[14]  Mark Edwards,et al.  Spatial-frequency and contrast tuning of the transient-stereopsis system , 1998, Vision Research.

[15]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[16]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination? , 1996, Vision Research.

[17]  Mark Edwards,et al.  Orientation tuning of the transient-stereopsis system , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  Clifton Schor,et al.  Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: Effects on stereopsis and fusion , 1989, Vision Research.

[19]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[20]  M C COLEBRANDER,et al.  The limits of stereoscopic vision. , 1948, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[21]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Analysis of stereothresholds for stimuli below 2.5 c/deg , 1994, Vision Research.

[22]  Robert E. Bannon,et al.  SPATIAL SENSE AND MOVEMENTS OF THE EYE , 1948 .

[23]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[24]  R. Blake,et al.  How Contrast Affects Stereoacuity , 1988, Perception.

[25]  R Blake,et al.  Mislocalization of diplopic images. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  C. Schor,et al.  Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis , 1984, Vision Research.