Multi-Agent Planning for Coordinated Robotic Weed Killing

This work presents a strategy for coordinated multi-agent weeding under conditions of partial environmental information. The goal of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of coordination strategies for improving the weeding performance of autonomous agricultural robots. We show that, given a sufficient number of agents, the algorithm can successfully weed fields with various initial seed bank densities, even when multiple days are allowed to elapse before weeding commences. Furthermore, the use of coordination between agents is demonstrated to strongly improve system performance as the number of agents increases, enabling the system to eliminate all the weeds in the field, as in the case of full environmental information, when the planner without coordination failed to do so. As a domain to test our algorithms, we have developed an open source simulation environment, Weed World, which allows real-time visualization of coordinated weeding policies, and includes realistic weed generation. In this work, experiments are conducted to determine the required number of agents and their required transit speed, for given initial seed bank densities and varying allowed days before the start of the weeding process.

[1]  J. Lindquist,et al.  Predicting Emergence of 23 Summer Annual Weed Species , 2014, Weed Science.

[2]  C. L. Mohler,et al.  Evaluation of Mechanical Weed Management Programs for Corn (Zea mays) , 1997, Weed Technology.

[3]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Decentralized control of partially observable Markov decision processes , 2015, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  T. Loughin,et al.  Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species , 2000 .

[5]  Dale L. Shaner,et al.  Lessons Learned From the History of Herbicide Resistance , 2014, Weed Science.

[6]  Kenneth L. Smith,et al.  Why Early Season Weed Control Is Important in Maize , 2012, Weed Science.

[7]  Clarence J. Swanton,et al.  Weed Ecology in Natural and Agricultural Systems , 2003 .

[8]  George B. Frisvold,et al.  Economic Returns to Herbicide Resistance Management in the Short and Long Run: The Role of Neighbor Effects , 2016, Weed Science.

[9]  I. Heap International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds , 1997 .

[10]  M. Bagavathiannan,et al.  Multiple-Herbicide Resistance Is Widespread in Roadside Palmer Amaranth Populations , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  W. G. Johnson,et al.  Comparative growth of six Amaranthus species in Missouri , 2003, Weed Science.

[12]  J. Gressel,et al.  How well will stacked transgenic pest/herbicide resistances delay pests from evolving resistance? , 2017, Pest management science.

[13]  B. Schutte,et al.  Do Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Seedling Emergence Patterns Meet Criteria for Herbicide Resistance Simulation Modeling? , 2014, Weed Technology.

[14]  Cody Matthew Evans Characterization of a novel five-way-resistant population of waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) , 2016 .

[15]  M. L. Roush,et al.  Predicting the Evolution and Dynamics of Herbicide Resistance in Weed Populations , 1990, Weed Technology.