Student Aid, Student Behavior, and Educational Attainment

Forty years ago, when the federal system of student loans and grants was born, about half of all recent high school graduates enrolled in college. While significant differences persist across demographic groups, we have made considerable progress in improving access to higher education. Today, two-thirds of those who complete high school enroll in two-year or four-year colleges within a year (NCES, 2013, Table 302.10). Since 1972, the percentage of adults ages 25 or older who have completed at least four years of college has increased from 12 percent to 32 percent (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014, Table A-2).1 Despite this progress, many of those who start college never earn degrees. Among Americans ages 25 and older, 17 percent have some college but no degree (U.S. Census Bureau, 2014, Table A-4). Among students who first enrolled in college in fall 2007, less than 60 percent had completed a degree or certificate after six years. While some were still enrolled, just under one-third had left without a credential (Shapiro & Dundar, 2013). The rising price of college, increasing reliance on student debt, and the significant earnings gap between those with only some college and those who completed degrees have led to an increasing focus on improving completion rates.2 Increasing the number of adults with postsecondary credentials depends both on removing barriers to college access and on finding ways to improve completion rates. In addition to the social and economic factors shaping the lives of young people long before they reach the age when they might begin postsecondary study, the quality of postsecondary pedagogy and academic support systems, the mechanisms available for financing college, and the attitudes and behaviors of students all influence the rate at which individuals successfully complete programs of study. The financial aid system is only one part of this story. But the availability of financial subsidies, the extent to which students understand and can access the system, and the enrollment patterns it encourages all contribute to educational attainment. The issue is not just whether the money is there, but whether financial aid programs and processes are structured to maximize the impact of the available funds on student enrollment and success. This paper examines the U.S. financial aid system from the perspective of its influence on behaviors likely to affect postsecondary enrollment and success. The federal student aid system was designed to diminish financial barriers for students without sufficient resources to pay for

[1]  Douglas N. Harris,et al.  Need-Based Financial Aid and College Persistence Experimental Evidence from Wisconsin , 2012 .

[2]  Thomas J. Kane,et al.  8. Student Perceptions of College Opportunities: The Boston COACH Program , 2004 .

[3]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[4]  E. Lazear Bait and Switch , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[6]  C. Mooney A Normative Theory of Bankruptcy Law: Bankruptcy as (is) Civil Procedure , 2004 .

[7]  Philip Oreopoulos,et al.  Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Cathleen Johnson,et al.  Debt Aversion and the Demand for Loans for Postsecondary Education , 2007 .

[9]  R. Thaler,et al.  Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron , 2003 .

[10]  Afet Dundar,et al.  Completing College: A National View of Student Attainment Rates--Fall 2008 Cohort (Signature Report No. 8). , 2014 .

[11]  C. Hoxby Introduction to "College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay For It" , 2004 .

[12]  Donald E. Heller Student Price Response in Higher Education: An Update to Leslie and Brinkman , 1997 .

[13]  Judith E. Scott-Clayton On Money and Motivation: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Financial Incentives for College Achievement , 2011 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[15]  Brigitte C. Madrian,et al.  Defined Contribution Pensions: Plan Rules, Participant Decisions, and the Path of Least Resistance , 2002 .

[16]  H. Patrinos,et al.  Measuring Aversion to Debt: An Experiment Among Student Loan Candidates , 2011, Journal of Family and Economic Issues.

[17]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[18]  Oren Bar-Gill,et al.  Seduction by Contract: Law, Economics and Psychology in Consumer Markets - Introduction , 2012 .

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[20]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[21]  Judith E. Scott-Clayton,et al.  Redesigning the Pell Grant Program for the Twenty-First Century , 2013 .

[22]  James B. Stedman Federal Pell Grant Program of the Higher Education Act: Background and Reauthorization , 2002 .

[23]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[24]  O. Svenson ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[25]  Cathleen Johnson,et al.  Loan Aversion Among Canadian High School Students , 2011 .

[26]  Susan M. Dynarski,et al.  The Cost of Complexity in Federal Student Aid: Lessons from Optimal Tax Theory and Behavioral Economics , 2006, National Tax Journal.

[27]  William J. Hussar,et al.  The Condition of Education , 2010 .

[28]  Thomas H. Jackson,et al.  The Fresh-Start Policy in Bankruptcy Law , 1985 .

[29]  Susan M. Dynarski,et al.  STUDENT AID SIMPLIFICATION: LOOKING BACK AND LOOKING AHEAD , 2012, National Tax Journal.

[30]  B. Schwartz The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[31]  D. Ariely,et al.  Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment , 2002, Psychological science.

[32]  Peter Davies,et al.  Understanding the information needs of users of public information about higher education , 2010 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[34]  Brigitte C. Madrian,et al.  Defined Contribution Pensions: Plan Rules, Participant Choices, and the Path of Least Resistance , 2002, Tax Policy and the Economy.

[35]  Thomas J. Kane Rising Public College Tuition and College Entry: How Well Do Public Subsidies Promote Access to College? , 1995 .

[36]  Philip Oreopoulos,et al.  The Role of Application Assistance and Information in College Decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA Experiment* , 2012 .

[37]  H. Pfister,et al.  The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[38]  Jennifer L. Stephan,et al.  Beyond One-Size-Fits-All College Dreams Alternative Pathways to Desirable Careers , 2010 .

[39]  E. Bettinger,et al.  The Role of Simplification and Information in College Decisions: Results from the H&R Block Fafsa Experiment , 2009 .

[40]  Douglas E. Allen,et al.  Toward a Theory of Consumer Choice as Sociohistorically Shaped Practical Experience: The Fits-Like-a-Glove (FLAG) Framework , 2002 .

[41]  Eric N. Waltenburg,et al.  Crossing the Finish Line , 2014 .