Why Cooperate? Public Goods, Economic Power, and the Montreal Protocol

This paper develops a correlated probit model to describe dichotomous choices that may contain a public-goods component or some other forms of interdependency. The key contribution of the paper is to formulate tests for interdependent behavior among agents. In particular, we examine the decisions by nations whether or not to ratify the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Specifically, we reject free riding as a motive for not ratifying the Protocol, and we find little evidence that individual nations were influenced by the behavior of their largest trading partners. Hence, the data suggest that, with respect to the Montreal Protocol, most nations acted without regard for the actions of other nations.

[1]  Raymond D. Gastil,et al.  Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties , 1979 .

[2]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[3]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[4]  A. Hadenius.  Democracy and Development , 1992 .

[5]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[6]  Michael Keane,et al.  A Computationally Practical Simulation Estimator for Panel Data , 1994 .

[7]  A. Rose,et al.  Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade" Canadian Journal of , 2001 .

[8]  D. Meadows,et al.  Beyond the limits: confronting global collapse envisioning a sustainable future. , 1992 .

[9]  Roger D. Congleton.  Political Institutions and Pollution Control , 1992 .

[10]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[11]  Michael Keane,et al.  Simulation estimation for panel data models with limited dependent variables , 1993 .

[12]  R. Stolarski,et al.  Stratospheric Chlorine: a Possible Sink for Ozone , 1974 .

[13]  Todd Sandler,et al.  The participation decision versus the level of participation in an environmental treaty: a spatial probit analysis , 2003 .

[14]  K. Gleditsch,et al.  War and Peace in Space and Time: The Role of Democratization , 2000 .

[15]  Kathryn Graddy,et al.  Freedom, growth, and the environment , 2000, Environment and Development Economics.

[16]  Todd Sandler,et al.  EASY RIDERS, JOINT PRODUCTION, AND PUBLIC GOODS* , 1984 .

[17]  Paul A. Ruud,et al.  Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives theoretical and computational results , 1996 .

[18]  M. Molina,et al.  Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atomc-atalysed destruction of ozone , 1974, Nature.

[19]  J. Farman,et al.  LARGE LOSSES OF TOTAL OZONE IN ANTARCTICA , 1985 .

[20]  H. Varian,et al.  On the private provision of public goods , 1986 .

[21]  Wim P. M. Vijverberg,et al.  Monte Carlo evaluation of multivariate normal probabilities , 1997 .

[22]  Vassilis A. Hajivassiliou,et al.  Simulation Estimation Methods for Limited Dependent Variable Models , 1991 .

[23]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Networks Versus Markets in International Trade , 1996 .

[24]  V. Hajivassiliou,et al.  Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models , 1993 .

[25]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[26]  J. Murdoch,et al.  The voluntary provision of a pure public good: The case of reduced CFC emissions and the Montreal Protocol , 1997 .

[27]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[28]  H. P. Bowen,et al.  World Trade Flows, 1970-1992, with Production and Tariff Data , 1997 .

[29]  M. Olson.  Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. , 1993 .