This chapter reviews the empirical results of this study. Section 6.2 presents an international comparison of long-term supply relationships between the United States, Japan and Europe. The empirical evidence indicates that there are strong similarities between the three regions. We do find differences but these differences seem small, particularly relative to the expectations one may have on the basis of received view on systemic differences between “Japanese” and “Western” contracting. Thus, if indeed there were large differences between the Triad’s regions, there now appears to be considerable convergence towards a common underlying logic’ of long-term supply relationships. However, the underlying causal structures have not completely converged into one overall system, and section 6.3 discusses this. Despite all similarities, our results also show remaining differences between the regions. Each of the differences by itself do not explain much; however, when connecting the differences they provide new insights. Section 6.3 concludes that in the US perhaps a “Third Way” has been found. Section 6.4 presents an interpretation of the results. Our empirical results confirm the interactive nature of firm- and relation-specific characteristics. As we conclude, the interactions hint at a dynamic process and we identify various causal loops. These causal loops may lie at the heart of the working of long-term supply relationships. Section 6.5 presents a final review of this study. Among others, it provides several arguments beyond this study that may explain the strong similarities between the Triad’s regions.