Combining and comparing morphometric shape descriptors with a molecular phylogeny: the case of fruit type evolution in Bornean Lithocarpus (Fagaceae).

Fruit type in the genus Lithocarpus (Fagaceae) includes both classic oak acorns and novel modifications. Bornean taxa with modified fruits can be separated into two sections (Synaedrys and Lithocarpus) based on subtle shape differences. By following strict criteria for homology and representation, this variation in shape can be captured and the sections distinguished by using elliptic Fourier or eigenshape analysis. Phenograms of fruit shape, constructed by using restricted maximum likelihood techniques and these morphometric descriptors, were incorporated into combined and comparative analyses with molecular sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear rDNA, using branch-weighted matrix representation. The combined analysis strongly suggested independent derivation of the novel fruit type in the two sections from different acornlike ancestors, while the comparative analysis indicated frequent decoupling between the molecular and morphological changes as inferred at well-supported nodes. The acorn fruit type has undergone little modification between ingroup and outgroup, despite large molecular distance. Greater morphological than molecular change was inferred at critical transitions between acorn and novel fruit types, particularly for section Lithocarpus. The combination of these two different types of data improved our understanding of the macroevolution of fruit type in this difficult group, and the comparative analysis highlighted the significant incongruities in evolutionary pattern between the two datasets.

[1]  M. F. Michevich Transformation Series Analysis , 1982 .

[2]  B. G. Baldwin Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the compositae. , 1992, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[3]  J. Wiens Testing Phylogenetic Methods with Tree Congruence: Phylogenetic Analysis of Polymorphic Morphological Characters in Phrynosomatid Lizards , 1998 .

[4]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[5]  Ramón Díaz-Uriarte,et al.  TESTING HYPOTHESES OF CORRELATED EVOLUTION USING PHYLOGENETICALLY INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS: SENSITIVITY TO DEVIATIONS FROM BROWNIAN MOTION , 1996 .

[6]  The Bornean Lithocarpus Bl. section Synaedrys (Lindl.) Barnett (Fagaceae): its circumscription and description of a new species. , 2000 .

[7]  Thomas S. Ray,et al.  LANDMARK EIGENSHAPE ANALYSIS: HOMOLOGOUS CONTOURS: LEAF SHAPE IN SYNGONIUM (ARACEAE) , 1992 .

[8]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  Parsimony Analysis in Historical Biogeography and Coevolution: Methodological and Theoretical Update , 1990 .

[9]  T. Sitnikova,et al.  Bootstrap method of interior-branch test for phylogenetic trees. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  J. Dransfield,et al.  Manual of Forest Fruits, Seeds and Seedlings , 1994 .

[11]  Charles R. Giardina,et al.  Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[12]  T. Givnish On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity , 1999 .

[13]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  SEEDLING DENSITY DEPENDENCE PROMOTES COEXISTENCE OF BORNEAN RAIN FOREST TREES , 1999 .

[14]  D. Adams,et al.  Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: a comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995). , 1998, Systematic biology.

[15]  C. Crônier,et al.  Ontogeny of Trimerocephalus lelievrei (Trilobita, Phacopida), a representative of the Late Devonian phacopine paedomorphocline: a morphometric approach , 1998, Paleobiology.

[16]  Michael M. Miyamoto,et al.  TESTING SPECIES PHYLOGENIES AND PHYLOGENETIC METHODS WITH CONGRUENCE , 1995 .

[17]  E. C. B. D.Sc. Keys to the Species Groups of Quercus, Lithocarpus, and Castanopsis of Eastern Asia, with Notes on their Distribution , 1944 .

[18]  Sabrina Renaud,et al.  Fourier analysis applied to Stephanomys (Rodentia, Muridae) molars: nonprogressive evolutionary pattern in a gradual lineage , 1996, Paleobiology.

[19]  T. Mclellan Geographic variation and plasticity of leaf shape and size in Begonia dregei and B. homonyma (Begoniaceae). , 2000 .

[20]  Dwight T. Kincaid,et al.  Quantification of leaf shape with a microcomputer and Fourier transform , 1983 .

[21]  D. Schluter,et al.  Using Phylogenies to Test Macroevolutionary Hypotheses of Trait Evolution in Cranes (Gruinae) , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[22]  J. Felsenstein CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia) , 1999, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  D. Janzen Tropical blackwater rivers, animals, and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae , 1974 .

[25]  H. Nagamasu,et al.  Plant reproductive phenology over four years including an episode of general flowering in a lowland dipterocarp forest,Sarawak, Malaysia. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[26]  E. Soepadmo,et al.  New species and new record of Lithocarpus Blume (Fagaceae) from Sabah and Sarawak. Malaysia , 1998 .

[27]  J. Felsenstein Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. , 1973, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FOURIER METHODS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF WING SHAPE IN MOSQUITOES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) , 1984 .

[29]  Carol J. Bult,et al.  Constructing a Significance Test for Incongruence , 1995 .

[30]  Hiroki Ito,et al.  How Does Masting Happen and Synchronize , 1997 .

[31]  C Del Favero,et al.  Shape of the human corpus callosum in childhood. Elliptic Fourier analysis on midsagittal magnetic resonance scans. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[32]  D. Kelly,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  I. Roth Fruits of angiosperms , 1977 .

[34]  Daiqing Mou,et al.  SEPARATING TABELLARIA (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE) SHAPE GROUPS BASED ON FOURIER DESCRIPTORS 1 , 1992 .

[35]  James S. Crampton,et al.  Elliptic Fourier shape analysis of fossil bivalves: some practical considerations , 1995 .

[36]  O. Bininda-Emonds,et al.  Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[37]  S. Ferson,et al.  Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines , 1985 .

[38]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF THE SPATIOTEMPORAL SCALE OF SEED PREDATION IN MAST‐FRUITING DIPTEROCARPACEAE , 2000 .

[39]  R. Spjut A Systematic Treatment of Fruit Types , 1994 .

[40]  Andy Purvis,et al.  A Modification to Baum and Ragan's Method for Combining Phylogenetic Trees , 1995 .

[41]  Wojciech Borkowski,et al.  Fractal dimension based features are useful descriptors of leaf complexity and shape , 1999 .

[42]  J. True,et al.  An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. , 1997, Genetics.

[43]  P. Lestrel,et al.  Longitudinal study of cranial base shape changes in Macaca nemestrina. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[44]  V. Roth,et al.  Homology and hierarchies: Problems solved and unresolved , 1991 .

[45]  J. Doyle,et al.  Gene Trees and Species Trees: Molecular Systematics as One-Character Taxonomy , 1992 .

[46]  E. Martins,et al.  PHYLOGENIES, SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSION, AND THE COMPARATIVE METHOD: A COMPUTER SIMULATION TEST , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  A. Lombarte,et al.  Variability of the sulcus acusticus in the sagittal otolith of the genus Merluccius (Merlucciidae) , 2000 .

[48]  B. Baum Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees , 1992 .

[49]  Charles H. Cannon,et al.  Systematics of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic Tests of Reproductive Trait Evolution , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[50]  Norman MacLeod,et al.  Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis , 1999, Paleobiology.

[51]  T. Garland,et al.  Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[52]  J. Felsenstein,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY TREES FROM GENE FREQUENCIES AND QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS: FINDING MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATES , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  M. Ragan,et al.  Matrix representation in reconstructing phylogenetic relationships among the eukaryotes. , 1992, Bio Systems.

[54]  L. L. Forman On the evolution of cupules in the Fagaceae , 1966 .

[55]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis, and analysis of coordinates , 1986 .

[56]  J. Farris Estimating Phylogenetic Trees from Distance Matrices , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[57]  J. Endler,et al.  The Relative Success of Some Methods for Measuring and Describing the Shape of Complex Objects , 1998 .

[58]  K. Nixon,et al.  Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[59]  David L. Swofford,et al.  Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony , 1987 .

[60]  S. Manchester Fruits and seeds of the middle eocene nut beds flora Clarno Formation, Oregon , 1994 .

[61]  L. M. Langdon Ontogenetic and Anatomical Studies of the Flower and Fruit of the Fagaceae and Juglandaceae , 1939, Botanical Gazette.