Failure tolerant teleoperation of a kinematically redundant manipulator: an experimental study

Teleoperated robots in harsh environments have a significant likelihood of failures. It has been shown in previous work that a common type of failure such as that of a joint "locking up," when unidentified by the robot controller, can cause considerable performance degradation in the local behavior of the manipulator even for simple point-to-point motion tasks. The effects of a failure become more critical for a system with a human in the loop, where unpredictable behavior of the robotic arm can completely disorient the operator. In this experimental study involving teleoperation of a graphically simulated kinematically redundant manipulator, two control schemes, the pseudoinverse and a proposed failure-tolerant inverse, were randomly presented under both nonfailure and failure scenarios to a group of operators. Based on performance measures derived from the recorded trajectory data and operator ratings of task difficulty, it is seen that the failure-tolerant inverse kinematic control scheme improved the performance of the human/robot system.

[1]  Jean-Louis Vercher,et al.  Hand movement strategies in telecontrolled motion along 2-D trajectories , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  Joseph R. Cavallaro,et al.  Analysis of robots for hazardous environments , 1997, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[3]  Sabri Tosunoglu,et al.  Control algorithms for fault-tolerant robots , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  John V. Draper,et al.  The impact of manipulator failures on remote task performance , 1990 .

[5]  G. F. McLean,et al.  Teleoperated system performance evaluation , 1994 .

[6]  A. A. Maciejewski,et al.  Dexterity optimization of kinematically redundant manipulators in the presence of joint failures , 1994 .

[7]  Joseph R. Cavallaro,et al.  A dynamic fault tolerance framework for remote robots , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  Experimental Psychology: Understanding Psychological Research , 1978 .

[9]  Shigeru Tsuchiya,et al.  A fault-tolerant control algorithm having a decentralized autonomous architecture for space hyper-redundant manipulators , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[10]  M. Jamshidi,et al.  Robot manipulator control for hazardous waste-handling applications , 1992, J. Field Robotics.

[11]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Teleoperation Performance with a Kinematically Redundant Slave Robot , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Real-time failure-tolerant control of kinematically redundant manipulators , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Vladimir J. Lumelsky,et al.  On human performance in telerobotics , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  Guangjun Liu Control of robot manipulators with consideration of actuator performance degradation and failures , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[15]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  An analysis of the post-fault behavior of robotic manipulators , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[17]  E. Wu,et al.  A failure tolerant joint design for the Space Shuttle remote manipulator system: analysis and experiment , 1992, [Proceedings 1992] The First IEEE Conference on Control Applications.

[18]  Joseph R. Cavallaro,et al.  Robotic fault detection and fault tolerance: A survey , 1994 .

[19]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Kinematic design of fault tolerant manipulators , 1992 .

[20]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[21]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Undetected locked-joint failures in kinematically redundant manipulators: a workspace analysis , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[22]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Mapping tasks into fault tolerant manipulators , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  William R. Ferrell,et al.  Remote manipulation with transmission delay. , 1965 .

[24]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Fault tolerance for kinematically redundant manipulators: anticipating free-swinging joint failures , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[25]  R. Mukundan,et al.  Crippled motion in robots , 1988 .

[26]  Yasuhiro Masutani,et al.  Robustness of sensory feedback control based on imperfect Jacobian , 1991 .

[27]  John T. Chladek,et al.  Fault-tolerant joint development for the Space Shuttle remote manipulator system: analysis and experiment , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[28]  Yung Ting,et al.  A control structure for fault-tolerant operation of robotic manipulators , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[29]  Manish Goel Tolerating undetected failures in robotic manipulators , 1998 .

[30]  Moshe Shoham,et al.  Motion Control Algorithms for Sensor-Equipped Robots , 1987 .

[31]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  The design of control strategies tolerant to unidentified failures in kinematically redundant manipulators , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[32]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  Fault tolerant operation of kinematically redundant manipulators for locked joint failures , 1997, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..