Chapter 9 The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries

[1]  S. Christman,et al.  Upper and lower visual field differences in categorical and coordinate judgments , 1998 .

[2]  S. Christman,et al.  Lateral biases in aesthetic preferences: pictorial dimensions and neural mechanisms. , 1997, Laterality.

[3]  F. Previc.  Attentional and Oculomotor Influences on Visual Field Anisotropies in Visual Search Performance , 1996 .

[4]  E. Yund,et al.  Guided Search: The Effects of Learning , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  Fred H. Previc,et al.  Do Individuals' Visual Recognition Thresholds Predict Performance on Concurrent Attitude Control Flight Tasks? , 1996 .

[6]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field , 1995, Vision Research.

[7]  F H Previc,et al.  Discriminability of random-dot stereograms in three-dimensional space. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[8]  J. Stein.  Developmental dyslexia, neural timing and hemispheric lateralisation. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: Horizontal and vertical dimensions , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Fred H. Previc,et al.  The relationship between eye dominance and head tilt in humans , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  G Mulder,et al.  Visual spatial attention to stimuli presented on the vertical and horizontal meridian: an ERP study. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[13]  F. Previc,et al.  Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space , 1993, Vision Research.

[14]  M. Viggiano,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry in Transient Visual Evoked Potentials Induced by the Spatial Factor of the Stimulation , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  F. Kitterle,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the interference among components of compound gratings , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  F. Prete.  Stimulus configuration and location in the visual field affect appetitive responses by the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.) , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Kolinsky,et al.  Illusory conjunctions and the cerebral hemispheres , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  David R Badcock,et al.  Asymmetries in the Sensitivity to Motion in Depth: A Centripetal Bias , 1993, Perception.

[19]  L. Mecacci.  On Spatial Frequencies and Cerebral Hemispheres: Some Remarks from the Electrophysiological and Neuropsychological Points of View , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  J. O'regan,et al.  Is there a systematic location for the pseudo-fovea in patients with central scotoma? , 1993, Vision Research.

[21]  S. Christman.  Local-global processing in the upper versus lower visual fields , 1993 .

[22]  Michael K. McBeath,et al.  Lateral motion bias associated with reading direction , 1992, Vision Research.

[23]  J. Findlay,et al.  Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: Dependence of saccadic latency on target location , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Attention as a Cognitive and Neural System , 1992 .

[25]  Nicoletta Berardi,et al.  Visual field asymmetries in pattern discrimination: A sign of asymmetry in cortical visual field representation? , 1991, Vision Research.

[26]  E. W. Yund,et al.  Visual detectability gradients: Effect of illiteracy , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  E. Yund,et al.  Visual detectability gradients: Effect of high-speed visual experience , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  Koichi Oda,et al.  Effective visual field size necessary for vertical reading during Japanese text processing , 1991 .

[29]  A. F. Sanders,et al.  The effect of presentation time on the size of the visual lobe , 1991 .

[30]  Graham K Edgar,et al.  Hemifield Differences in Perceived Spatial Frequency , 1990, Perception.

[31]  G. Underwood,et al.  Twisting the world by 90° , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  F. Previc.  Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Handedness and hemispheric asymmetry of pattern reversal visual-evoked potentials , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of target location: Effects of spatial configuration , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  E. Yund,et al.  Serial processing of visual spatial patterns in a search paradigm , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability gradients as a function of target location , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  J. Garon,et al.  Hemispheric differences in visual search of simple line arrays , 1990, Psychological research.

[39]  M. V. Kleeck.  Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range , 1989, Vision Research.

[42]  Claude Bonnet,et al.  Influence of spatial frequency and handedness on hemispheric asymmetry in visually steady-state evoked potentials , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Evidence of foveal splitting in a commissurotomy patient , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  J. Hellige,et al.  Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[45]  C. B. Cave,et al.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  R. Robison,et al.  Preferences of Palaeozoic predators , 1989, Nature.

[47]  Y. Tsal.  Attending to horizontal, diagonal, and vertical positions in space , 1989 .

[48]  I P Howard,et al.  Human Horizontal Optokinetic Nystagmus Elicited by the Upper Versus the Lower Visual Fields , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[49]  L. Robertson,et al.  The role of perceptual reference frames in visual field asymmetries , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  J. Calvert.  Adaptation to Movement in Right and Left Visual Fields , 1988, Cortex.

[51]  E. Yund,et al.  Scanning the visual field without eye movements—A sex difference , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  C. Tyler.  Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. III. Meridional variations in peripheral flicker sensitivity. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[55]  S. Kosslyn.  Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[56]  K. Prazdny,et al.  On the coarse-to-fine strategy in stereomatching , 1987 .

[57]  W. Skrandies.  The Upper and Lower Visual Field of Man: Electrophysiological and Functional Differences , 1987 .

[58]  M. Eglin,et al.  The effects of different attentional loads on feature integration in the cerebral hemispheres , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  J. Polich,et al.  Hemispheric differences for feature detection , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  J. Hutton,et al.  Lateral saccadic latencies and handedness , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  G L Shulman,et al.  The Role of Spatial-Frequency Channels in the Perception of Local and Global Structure , 1986, Perception.

[62]  D Regan,et al.  Visual field defects for vergence eye movements and for stereomotion perception. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[63]  P. Hammond,et al.  Hemifield Differences in Perceived Velocity , 1986, Perception.

[64]  Curtis Hardyck,et al.  Cerebral asymmetries and experimental parameters: Real differences and imaginary variations? , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[65]  A J Courtney,et al.  Visual lobe dimensions and search performance for targets on a competing homogeneous background , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  F. Kitterle,et al.  Hemispheric symmetry in contrast and orientation sensitivity , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  A. Rubens.  Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect , 1985, Neurology.

[68]  W Skrandies,et al.  Critical flicker fusion and double flash discrimination in different parts of the visual field. , 1985, The International journal of neuroscience.

[69]  A Fiorentini,et al.  Right-Hemisphere Superiority in the Discrimination of Spatial Phase , 1984, Perception.

[70]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[71]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Contribution of two movement detecting mechanisms to central and peripheral vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[72]  Anna Grabowska,et al.  Lateral differences in the detection of stereoscopic depth , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[73]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual fields for frontal plane motion and for changing size , 1983, Vision Research.

[74]  Marie T Banich,et al.  Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces , 1983, Brain and Cognition.

[75]  J Sergent,et al.  Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  G. Lennerstrand,et al.  CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NORMAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC SINUSOIDAL GRATINGS , 1983, Acta ophthalmologica.

[77]  J. Sergent.  The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  K. Kirsner,et al.  Laterality Effects in Visual Information Processing: Hemispheric Specialisation or the Orienting of Attention?* , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[79]  R. D. Whitman,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Discrimination of Frequency in the Right and Left Visual Fields: A Preliminary Report , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.

[80]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[81]  K. Rayner,et al.  Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[82]  S. Heywood,et al.  Structure of the Visual Array and Saccadic Latency: Implications for Oculomotor Control* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[83]  G. McConkie,et al.  Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[84]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental imagery acuity in the peripheral visual field. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[85]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[86]  C. Umilta,et al.  Evidence for a Right Hemisphere Superiority and for a Serial Search Strategy in a Dot Detection Task , 1979, Cortex.

[87]  R Blake,et al.  Pattern and Flicker Detection Examined in Terms of the Nasal — Temporal Division of the Retina , 1979, Perception.

[88]  P. Mcdonnell,et al.  Patterns of eye-hand coordination in the first year of life. , 1979, Canadian journal of psychology.

[89]  L. O. Harvey.  Single representation of the visual midline in humans , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[90]  D. O'Boyle,et al.  Hemisphere function and binocular depth perception. , 1978, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[91]  P C Dodwell,et al.  Reaching in Very Young Infants , 1978, Perception.

[92]  K. Hamsher.  Stereopsis and unilateral brain disease. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[93]  Billy E. Pennal,et al.  Human cerebral asymmetry in color discrimination , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[94]  J. Davidoff.  Hemispheric Differences in Dot Detection , 1977, Cortex.

[95]  E. Renzi,et al.  The Occurrence of Visual Neglect in Patients With Unilateral Cerebral Disease , 1976, Cortex.

[96]  B. Julesz,et al.  Binocular-Disparity-Dependent Upper—Lower Hemifield Anisotropy and Left—Right Hemifield Isotropy as Revealed by Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms , 1976, Perception.

[97]  Joan E. Foley,et al.  The selective utilization of information in the optic array , 1976, Psychological research.

[98]  P. Coles,et al.  Visual field differences in recognizing letters , 1976 .

[99]  S. Dimond,et al.  The use of contact lenses for the lateralisation of visual input in man. , 1975, Acta psychologica.

[100]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Letter versus Dot Stimuli as Tools for “Splitting the Normal Brain with Reaction Time” , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[101]  B. Julesz,et al.  Dynamic random-dot stereograms reveal up-down anisotropy and left-right isotropy between cortical hemifields , 1975, Science.

[102]  Michel Millodot,et al.  Peripheral visual acuity in the vertical plane , 1974 .

[103]  D Regan,et al.  A stereo field map with implications for disparity processing. , 1973, Investigative ophthalmology.

[104]  F. Chédru,et al.  Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[105]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Eye and Head Turning Indicates Cerebral Lateralization , 1972, Science.

[106]  D. Kimura,et al.  Right Hemisphere Specialization for Depth Perception reflected in Visual Field Differences , 1971, Nature.

[107]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Splitting the normal brain with reaction time , 1969 .

[108]  B. Cragg.  The topography of the afferent projections in the circumstriate visual cortex of the monkey studied by the Nauta method. , 1969, Vision research.

[109]  S. Zeki.  Representation of central visual fields in prestriate cortex of monkey. , 1969, Brain research.

[110]  A. Carmon,et al.  Dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere for stereopsis , 1969 .

[111]  W. H. Payne.  Visual Reaction Times on a Circle about the Fovea , 1967, Science.

[112]  J VOLKMANN,et al.  Mapping a Field of Short-Time Visual Search , 1962, Science.

[113]  G. Greenberg.  Eye-dominance and head-tilt. , 1960, The American journal of psychology.

[114]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[115]  J. Orbach,et al.  Retinal locus as a factor in the recognition of visually perceived words. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[116]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[117]  B. Hylkema,et al.  EXAMINATION OF THE VISUAL FIELD BY DETERMINING THE FUSION FREQUENCY , 1942 .