Dimensional accuracy of Electron Beam Melting (EBM) additive manufacture with regard to weight optimized truss structures

The Electron Beam (EBM) additive manufacturing process is well suited to fabricating complex structural designs in Ti–6Al–4V because of the design freedoms it offers combined with strong and consistent material properties. However it has been observed that complications may arise when manufacturing truss-like structures (such as those produced via structural topology optimization) in the form of undersized features on the finished part. The issue appears to affect truss members that are not aligned with the vertical build direction, with an apparent lack of material on the negative surfaces. This effect appears to worsen with a greater angle between the truss member and the build direction, even with the use of support structures. This investigation has characterized and measured the dimensional errors that result from this issue through 3D scanning techniques. Process modifications have then been made which result in significant improvements in dimensional accuracy. This investigation highlights the importance of heat management at features with negative surfaces to yield parts that are dimensionally accurate without introducing excessive internal melt defects in the form of voids and porosity.

[1]  Mamidala Ramulu,et al.  Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Components: Properties and Performance , 2013 .

[2]  Surinder Kaur,et al.  Recommendations for Validation of LC-MS/MS Bioanalytical Methods for Protein Biotherapeutics , 2014, The AAPS Journal.

[3]  Ola L. A. Harrysson,et al.  Applications of structural optimization in direct metal fabrication , 2008 .

[4]  Iain Todd,et al.  Application of layout optimization to the design of additively manufactured metallic components , 2016 .

[5]  Mariana Calin,et al.  Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of commercially pure titanium , 2014 .

[6]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Topology optimization approaches , 2013, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[7]  Iain Todd,et al.  XCT analysis of the influence of melt strategies on defect population in Ti?6Al?4V components manufactured by Selective Electron Beam Melting , 2015 .

[8]  S. S. Al-Bermani,et al.  The Origin of Microstructural Diversity, Texture, and Mechanical Properties in Electron Beam Melted Ti-6Al-4V , 2010 .

[9]  Carolin Körner,et al.  Defect generation and propagation mechanism during additive manufacturing by selective beam melting , 2014 .

[10]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization , 2009 .

[11]  Mattias Schevenels,et al.  Robust topology optimization considering geometric imperfections , 2011 .

[12]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Robust topology optimization accounting for spatially varying manufacturing errors , 2011 .

[13]  Hongjia Lu Application of layout optimization to the design of bracing in buildings , 2017 .

[14]  J. Kruth,et al.  A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V , 2010 .