Autonomous Operations Planner: A Flexible Platform for Research in Flight-Deck Support for Airborne Self-Separation

The Autonomous Operations Planner (AOP), developed by NASA, is a flexible and powerful prototype of a flight-deck automation system to support self-separation of aircraft. It incorporates a variety of algorithms to detect and resolve conflicts between the trajectories of its own aircraft and traffic aircraft while meeting route constraints such as required times of arrival and avoiding airspace hazards such as convective weather and restricted airspace. This integrated suite of algorithms provides flight crew support for strategic and tactical conflict resolutions and conflict-free trajectory planning while en route. Versions of AOP have supported an extensive set of experiments covering various conditions and variations on the self-separation concept, yielding insight into the system’s design and resolving various challenges encountered in the exploration of the concept. The design of AOP will enable it to continue to evolve and support experimentation as the self-separation concept is refined.

[1]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Conflict probability estimation for free flight , 1997 .

[2]  Mondoloni Stephane,et al.  An Airborne Conflict Resolution Approach Using a Genetic Algorithm , 2001 .

[3]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  A Flight Deck Decision Support Tool for Autonomous Airborne Operations , 2002 .

[4]  Jacco M. Hoekstra,et al.  Designing for safety: the 'free flight' air traffic management concept , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  An Integrated Flight-Deck Decision-Support Tool in an Autonomous Flight Simulation , 2004 .

[6]  Doug Mielke,et al.  Airspace and Traffic Operations Simulation for Distributed ATM R esearch and Development , 2005 .

[7]  Gilles Dowek,et al.  Provably Safe Coordinated Strategy for Distributed Conflict Resolution , 2005 .

[8]  Paul Lee,et al.  Joint NASA Ames/Langley Experimental Evaluation of Integrated Air/Ground Operations for En Route Free Maneuvering , 2005 .

[9]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  Conflict Detection Using Variable Four-Dimensional Uncertainty Bounds to Control Missed Alerts , 2006 .

[10]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  Pattern-Based Genetic Algorithm for Airborne Conflict Resolution , 2006 .

[11]  Brian T. Baxley,et al.  Safety Performance of Airborne Separation: Preliminary Baseline Testing , 2007 .

[12]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  Abstraction Techniques for Capturing and Comparing Trajectory Predictor Capabilities and Requirements , 2008 .

[13]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  Experimental Performance of a Genetic Algorithm for Airborne Strategic Conflict Resolution , 2008 .

[14]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  Airborne Tactical Intent-Based Conflict Resolution Capability , 2009 .

[15]  César Muñoz,et al.  A Criteria Standard for Conflict Resolution: A Vision for Guaranteeing the Safety of Self-Separation in NextGen , 2010 .

[16]  César Muñoz,et al.  State-Based Implicit Coordination and Applications , 2011 .

[17]  Sara R. Wilson,et al.  Integration of weather avoidance and traffic separation , 2011, 2011 IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[18]  David J. Wing,et al.  For Spacious Skies: Self-Separation with "Autonomous Flight Rules" in US Domestic Airspace , 2011 .

[19]  David J. Wing,et al.  Autonomous Flight Rules - A Concept for Self-Separation in U.S. Domestic Airspace , 2011 .

[20]  Mark G. Ballin,et al.  Analysis of a Dynamic Multi-Track Airway Concept for Air Traffic Management , 2013 .