University of Groningen Nonequilibrium coexistence in a competition model with nutrient storage

Resource competition theory predicts that, in equilibrium, the number of coexisting species cannot exceed the number of limiting resources. In some competition models, however, competitive interactions may result in nonequilibrium dynamics, allowing the coexistence of many species on few resources. The relevance of these findings is still unclear, since some assumptions of the underlying models are unrealistic. Most importantly, these models assume that individual growth directly reflects the availability of external resources, whereas real organisms can store resources, thereby decoupling their growth from external fluctuations. Here we study the effects of resource storage by extending the well-known Droop model to the context of multiple species and multiple resources. We demonstrate that the extended Droop model shows virtually the same complex dynamics as models without storage. Depending on the model parameters, one may obtain competitive exclusion, stable equilibrium coexistence, periodic and non-periodic oscillations, and chaos. Again, nonequilibrium dynamics allows for the coexistence of many species on few resources. We discuss our findings in the light of earlier work on resource competition, highlighting the role of luxury consumption, trade-offs in competitive abilities, and ecological stoichiometry.

[1]  S. Levin,et al.  Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton , 2004, Nature.

[2]  K Lange,et al.  The attractiveness of the Droop equations. II. Generic uptake and growth functions. , 1994, Mathematical biosciences.

[3]  T. Legovic,et al.  A model of phytoplankton growth on multiple nutrients based on the Michaelis-Menten-Monod uptake, Droop's growth and Liebig's law , 1997 .

[4]  Robert A. Laird,et al.  Competitive Intransitivity Promotes Species Coexistence , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Hal L. Smith,et al.  Periodic coexistence of four species competing for three essential resources. , 2003, Mathematical biosciences.

[6]  M. Droop SOME THOUGHTS ON NUTRIENT LIMITATION IN ALGAE 1 , 1973 .

[7]  Bingtuan Li,et al.  Global dynamics of microbial competition for two resources with internal storage , 2007, Journal of mathematical biology.

[8]  Jacques Monod,et al.  LA TECHNIQUE DE CULTURE CONTINUE THÉORIE ET APPLICATIONS , 1978 .

[9]  Dag L. Aksnes,et al.  A theoretical model for nutrient uptake in phytoplankton , 1991 .

[10]  M. Gilpin Limit Cycles in Competition Communities , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems , 2000 .

[12]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[13]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[14]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .

[15]  B. Li Periodic coexistence in the chemostat with three species competing for three essential resources. , 2001, Mathematical biosciences.

[16]  C. S. Holling The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[17]  Wolf M. Mooij,et al.  Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? , 2001 .

[18]  Hal L. Smith,et al.  Competition for a Single Limiting Resource in Continuous Culture: The Variable-Yield Model , 1994, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[19]  D. Burmaster The Continuous Culture of Phytoplankton: Mathematical Equivalence Among Three Steady-State Models , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[20]  B. Blasius,et al.  Chaos in a periodically forced chemostat with algal mortality , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[22]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Oscillations and chaos generated by competition for interactively essential resources , 2002, Ecological Research.

[23]  D. Tilman Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach , 1977 .

[24]  J. Huisman,et al.  COMPETITION BETWEEN A PROCHLOROPHYTE AND A CYANOBACTERIUM UNDER VARIOUS PHOSPHORUS REGIMES: COMPARISON WITH THE DROOP MODEL , 1998 .

[25]  Elena Litchman,et al.  Phytoplankton growth and stoichiometry under multiple nutrient limitation , 2004 .

[26]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR OSCILLATIONS AND CHAOS GENERATED BY MULTISPECIES COMPETITION , 2001 .

[27]  K. Lange,et al.  The attractiveness of the Droop equations. , 1992, Mathematical biosciences.

[28]  J. A. León,et al.  Competition between two species for two complementary or substitutable resources. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  A. C. Redfield The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. , 1960, Science progress.

[30]  J. Huisman,et al.  Towards a solution of the plankton paradox : the importance of physiology and life history , 2001 .