University of Groningen Nonequilibrium coexistence in a competition model with nutrient storage
暂无分享,去创建一个
Franz J Weissing | F. Weissing | Tomás Revilla | T. Revilla | Franz | Weissing | J.
[1] S. Levin,et al. Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton , 2004, Nature.
[2] K Lange,et al. The attractiveness of the Droop equations. II. Generic uptake and growth functions. , 1994, Mathematical biosciences.
[3] T. Legovic,et al. A model of phytoplankton growth on multiple nutrients based on the Michaelis-Menten-Monod uptake, Droop's growth and Liebig's law , 1997 .
[4] Robert A. Laird,et al. Competitive Intransitivity Promotes Species Coexistence , 2006, The American Naturalist.
[5] Hal L. Smith,et al. Periodic coexistence of four species competing for three essential resources. , 2003, Mathematical biosciences.
[6] M. Droop. SOME THOUGHTS ON NUTRIENT LIMITATION IN ALGAE 1 , 1973 .
[7] Bingtuan Li,et al. Global dynamics of microbial competition for two resources with internal storage , 2007, Journal of mathematical biology.
[8] Jacques Monod,et al. LA TECHNIQUE DE CULTURE CONTINUE THÉORIE ET APPLICATIONS , 1978 .
[9] Dag L. Aksnes,et al. A theoretical model for nutrient uptake in phytoplankton , 1991 .
[10] M. Gilpin. Limit Cycles in Competition Communities , 1975, The American Naturalist.
[11] Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al. Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems , 2000 .
[12] J. Huisman,et al. Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.
[13] D. Tilman. Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.
[14] R. May,et al. Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .
[15] B. Li. Periodic coexistence in the chemostat with three species competing for three essential resources. , 2001, Mathematical biosciences.
[16] C. S. Holling. The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .
[17] Wolf M. Mooij,et al. Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? , 2001 .
[18] Hal L. Smith,et al. Competition for a Single Limiting Resource in Continuous Culture: The Variable-Yield Model , 1994, SIAM J. Appl. Math..
[19] D. Burmaster. The Continuous Culture of Phytoplankton: Mathematical Equivalence Among Three Steady-State Models , 1979, The American Naturalist.
[20] B. Blasius,et al. Chaos in a periodically forced chemostat with algal mortality , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[21] G. E. Hutchinson,et al. The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .
[22] Franz J. Weissing,et al. Oscillations and chaos generated by competition for interactively essential resources , 2002, Ecological Research.
[23] D. Tilman. Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach , 1977 .
[24] J. Huisman,et al. COMPETITION BETWEEN A PROCHLOROPHYTE AND A CYANOBACTERIUM UNDER VARIOUS PHOSPHORUS REGIMES: COMPARISON WITH THE DROOP MODEL , 1998 .
[25] Elena Litchman,et al. Phytoplankton growth and stoichiometry under multiple nutrient limitation , 2004 .
[26] Franz J. Weissing,et al. BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR OSCILLATIONS AND CHAOS GENERATED BY MULTISPECIES COMPETITION , 2001 .
[27] K. Lange,et al. The attractiveness of the Droop equations. , 1992, Mathematical biosciences.
[28] J. A. León,et al. Competition between two species for two complementary or substitutable resources. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.
[29] A. C. Redfield. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. , 1960, Science progress.
[30] J. Huisman,et al. Towards a solution of the plankton paradox : the importance of physiology and life history , 2001 .