Traces of Time through Space

Technology have long been a partner of workplace meeting facilitation. The recent outbreak of COVID-19 and the cautionary measures to reduce its spread have made it more prevalent than ever before in the form of online-meetings. In this paper, we recount our experiences during weekly meetings in three modalities: using SAGE2 - a collaborative sharing software designed for large displays - for co-located meetings, using a conventional projector for co-located meetings, and using the Zoom video-conferencing tool for distributed meetings. We view these meetings through the lens of effective meeting attributes and share ethnographic observations and attitudinal survey conducted in our research lab. We discuss patterns of content sharing, either sequential, parallel, or semi-parallel, and the potential advantages of creating complex canvases of content. We see how the SAGE2 tool affords parallel content sharing to create complex canvases, which represent queues of ideas and contributions (past, present, and future) using the space on a large display to suggest the progression of time through the meeting.

[1]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. , 2021, Technology, Mind, and Behavior.

[2]  Abraham G. Campbell,et al.  Uses of Virtual Reality for Communication in Financial Services: A Case Study on Comparing Different Telepresence Interfaces: Virtual Reality Compared to Video Conferencing , 2019, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.

[3]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings , 2021, CHI.

[4]  Jason Leigh,et al.  Sage River Disaster Information (SageRDI): Demonstrating Application Data Sharing In SAGE2 , 2018, ISS.

[5]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Webstrates: Shareable Dynamic Media , 2015, UIST.

[6]  Heejung Chung,et al.  Working from home during the COVID-19 lockdown: changing preferences and the future of work , 2020 .

[7]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication , 1992, CHI.

[8]  Maria Fernanda Granda,et al.  Evaluating the Meeting Solutions Used for Virtual Classes in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, VISIGRAPP.

[9]  F. Halasz,et al.  Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings , 1993, INTERCHI.

[10]  Theerasak Rojanarata,et al.  How Online Whiteboard Promotes Students' Collaborative Skills in Laboratory Learning , 2020 .

[11]  Mikkel Rønne Jakobsen,et al.  An exploratory study of how abundant display space may support data analysis , 2012, NordiCHI.

[12]  Andreas M. Kunz,et al.  CollaBoard: A Novel Interactive Electronic Whiteboard for Remote Collaboration with People on Content , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Cyberworlds.

[13]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The promise and peril of parallel chat in video meetings for work , 2021, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Neil Yorke-Smith,et al.  PTIME: Personalized assistance for calendaring , 2011, TIST.

[15]  S. Knudsen,et al.  Distributed Synchronous Visualization Design: Challenges and Strategies , 2020, 2020 IEEE Workshop on Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches to Visualization (BELIV).

[16]  Thomas Marrinan,et al.  SAGE2: A collaboration portal for scalable resolution displays , 2016, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[17]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Hybrid Meetings in the Modern Workplace: Stories of Success and Failure , 2019, CRIWG/CollabTech.

[18]  Anne E. James,et al.  A Virtual Meeting System for the New Age , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering.

[19]  Jens Emil Grønbæk,et al.  MirrorBlender: Supporting Hybrid Meetings with a Malleable Video-Conferencing System , 2021, CHI.

[20]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  Distributed meetings: a meeting capture and broadcasting system , 2002, MULTIMEDIA '02.

[21]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  With similar visual angles, larger displays improve spatial performance , 2003, CHI '03.

[22]  James R. Eagan,et al.  Shared substance: developing flexible multi-surface applications , 2011, CHI.

[23]  Birgit Kopainsky,et al.  Reflections on adapting group model building scripts into online workshops , 2020 .

[24]  Per Ola Kristensson,et al.  The Office of the Future: Virtual, Portable, and Global , 2018, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[25]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Impromptu: a new interaction framework for supporting collaboration in multiple display environments and its field evaluation for co-located software development , 2008, CHI.

[26]  Chris North,et al.  Semantic Interaction for Sensemaking: Inferring Analytical Reasoning for Model Steering , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[27]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Facilitating meetings with playful feedback , 2010, CHI EA '10.

[28]  Hao Jiang,et al.  WeSpace: the design development and deployment of a walk-up and share multi-surface visual collaboration system , 2009, CHI.

[29]  Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose,et al.  (Re)Configuring Hybrid Meetings: Moving from User-Centered Design to Meeting-Centered Design , 2020, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Thomas Marrinan,et al.  SAGE2: A new approach for data intensive collaboration using Scalable Resolution Shared Displays , 2014, 10th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing.

[31]  Lukás Burget,et al.  Transcribing Meetings With the AMIDA Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[32]  Christopher Andrews,et al.  Space to think: large high-resolution displays for sensemaking , 2010, CHI.

[33]  Nathaniel Good,et al.  Beyond Talking Heads: Multimedia Artifact Creation, Use, and Sharing in Distributed Meetings , 2016, CSCW.

[34]  G. Elisabeta Marai,et al.  StickySchedule: an interactive multi-user application for conference scheduling on large-scale shared displays , 2017, PerDis.

[35]  Roman Rädle,et al.  Cross-Device Taxonomy: Survey, Opportunities and Challenges of Interactions Spanning Across Multiple Devices , 2019, CHI.

[36]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  HydraScope: creating multi-surface meta-applications through view synchronization and input multiplexing , 2013, PerDis '13.

[37]  Christopher Andrews,et al.  Large high resolution displays for co-located collaborative sensemaking: Display usage and territoriality , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Hemant Bhaskar Surale,et al.  SurfaceFleet: Exploring Distributed Interactions Unbounded from Device, Application, User, and Time , 2020, UIST.

[39]  Xiaojun Bi,et al.  Comparing usage of a large high-resolution display to single or dual desktop displays for daily work , 2009, CHI.

[40]  Michael E. Papka,et al.  Modeling and evaluating user behavior in exploratory visual analysis , 2016, Inf. Vis..

[41]  Carlos Ramos,et al.  Smart Offices and Intelligent Decision Rooms , 2010, Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments.

[42]  Christopher Andrews,et al.  Information visualization on large, high-resolution displays: Issues, challenges, and opportunities , 2011, Inf. Vis..

[43]  Jason Leigh,et al.  High-Resolution Interactive and Collaborative Data Visualization Framework for Large-Scale Data Analysis , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[44]  Chris North,et al.  Effects of tiled high-resolution display on basic visualization and navigation tasks , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[45]  Beatrix Busse,et al.  Realizing an online conference , 2020 .

[46]  Nicolai Marquardt,et al.  Investigating the Role of an Overview Device in Multi-Device Collaboration , 2018, CHI.