Wiki-Based Maturing of Process Descriptions

Traditional process elicitation methods are expensive and time consuming. Recently, a trend toward collaborative, user-centric, online business process modeling can be observed. Current social software approaches, satisfying such a collaborative modeling, mostly focus on the graphical development of processes and do not consider existing textual process description like HowTos or guidelines. We address this issue by combining graphical process modeling techniques with a wiki-based light-weight knowledge capturing approach and a background semantic knowledge base. Our approach enables the collaborative maturing of process descriptions with a graphical representation, formal semantic annotations, and natural language. Existing textual process descriptions can be translated into graphical descriptions and formal semantic annotations. Thus, the textual and graphical process descriptions are made explicit and can be further processed. As a result, we provide a holistic approach for collaborative process development that is designed to foster knowledge reuse and maturing within the system.

[1]  Flávia Maria Santoro,et al.  Tell us your process: A group storytelling approach to cooperative process modeling , 2008, 2008 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design.

[2]  Flávia Maria Santoro,et al.  Groupware Support for Cooperative Process Elicitation , 2003, CRIWG.

[3]  Paolo Tonella,et al.  A framework for the collaborative specification of semantically annotated business processes , 2011, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[4]  Luciano Serafini,et al.  MoKi: a Wiki-Based Conceptual Modeling Tool , 2010, ISWC Posters&Demos.

[5]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Process mining: a research agenda , 2004, Comput. Ind..

[6]  Selmin Nurcan,et al.  Introduction to the First International Workshop on Business Process Management and Social Software (BPMS2 2008) , 2008, Business Process Management Workshops.

[7]  Mariëlle den Hengst,et al.  Collaborative Modeling of Processes: What Facilitation Support Does a Group Need? , 2005, AMCIS.

[8]  van der Wmp Wil Aalst,et al.  Workflow control-flow patterns : a revised view , 2006 .

[9]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Collaborative Process Development using Semantic MediaWiki , 2009, Wissensmanagement.

[10]  Yolanda Gil,et al.  Want world domination? win at risk!: matching to-do items with how-tos from the web , 2011, IUI '11.

[11]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  A diary study of task switching and interruptions , 2004, CHI.

[12]  Jesus Favela,et al.  Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  Selmin Nurcan,et al.  Combining BPM and social software: contradiction or chance? , 2010 .

[14]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Networked Knowledge - Networked Media , 2009 .

[15]  Jan Recker,et al.  How Novices Model Business Processes , 2010, BPM.

[16]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Conceptual Foundations for a Service-oriented Knowledge and Learning Architecture: Supporting Content, Process and Ontology Maturing , 2009, Networked Knowledge - Networked Media - Integrating Knowledge Management.

[18]  Michael Prilla,et al.  Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software , 2011, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[19]  Robert Tolksdorf,et al.  Extending the Makna Semantic Wiki to Support Workflows , 2008, SemWiki.

[20]  Rayid Ghani,et al.  Process-centric Enterprise Workspace based on Semantic Wiki , 2010, KMIS.

[21]  Oliver Thomas,et al.  Management of Model Relations Using Semantic Wikis , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Oryx - An Open Modeling Platform for the BPM Community , 2008, BPM.

[23]  Jan Recker,et al.  How Much Language Is Enough? Theoretical and Practical Use of the Business Process Modeling Notation , 2008, CAiSE.