Rigorous home range estimation with movement data: a new autocorrelated kernel density estimator.

Quantifying animals' home ranges is a key problem in ecology and has important conservation and wildlife management applications. Kernel density estimation (KDE) is a workhorse technique for range delineation problems that is both statistically efficient and nonparametric. KDE assumes that the data are independent and identically distributed (IID). However, animal tracking data, which are routinely used as inputs to KDEs, are inherently autocorrelated and violate this key assumption. As we demonstrate, using realistically autocorrelated data in conventional KDEs results in grossly underestimated home ranges. We further show that the performance of conventional KDEs actually degrades as data quality improves, because autocorrelation strength increases as movement paths become more finely resolved. To remedy these flaws with the traditional KDE method, we derive an autocorrelated KDE (AKDE) from first principles to use autocorrelated data, making it perfectly suited for movement data sets. We illustrate the vastly improved performance of AKDE using analytical arguments, relocation data from Mongolian gazelles, and simulations based upon the gazelle's observed movement process. By yielding better minimum area estimates for threatened wildlife populations, we believe that future widespread use of AKDE will have significant impact on ecology and conservation biology.

[1]  Jonathan R. Potts,et al.  How do animal territories form and change? Lessons from 20 years of mechanistic modelling , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[3]  John R Fieberg,et al.  Could you please phrase “home range” as a question? , 2012 .

[4]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home- range analyses with least-squares cross-validation , 2005 .

[5]  T. Hayden,et al.  Autocorrelated data in telemetry studies: time to independence and the problem of behavioural effects , 1998 .

[6]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Characterizing independence of observations in movements of columbian black-tailed deer , 1994 .

[7]  W. H. Burt Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[8]  Stephen M. Krone,et al.  Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. , 2007, Ecology.

[9]  John Fieberg,et al.  Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. , 2007, Ecology.

[10]  B. Worton Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[11]  Gary C. White,et al.  Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data , 1999 .

[12]  H. Kile,et al.  Bandwidth Selection in Kernel Density Estimation , 2010 .

[13]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range analysis , 2006 .

[14]  J. Calabrese,et al.  How landscape dynamics link individual‐ to population‐level movement patterns: a multispecies comparison of ungulate relocation data , 2011 .

[15]  Peter Leimgruber,et al.  From Fine-Scale Foraging to Home Ranges: A Semivariance Approach to Identifying Movement Modes across Spatiotemporal Scales , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[16]  A. Izenman Recent Developments in Nonparametric Density Estimation , 1991 .

[17]  P. Moorcroft Mechanistic approaches to understanding and predicting mammalian space use: recent advances, future directions , 2012 .

[18]  J. Fryxell,et al.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[19]  Craig Nicolson,et al.  Annual movements of Mongolian gazelles: Nomads in the Eastern Steppe , 2010 .

[20]  Rolf A. Ims,et al.  Effects of spatiotemporal scale on autocorrelation and home range estimators , 1997 .

[21]  M. Bekoff,et al.  Simulation analyses of space use: Home range estimates, variability, and sample size , 1984 .

[22]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Territoriality and home-range dynamics in meerkats, Suricata suricatta: a mechanistic modelling approach. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[23]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates , 1999 .

[24]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range models and resource selection analysis: a reconciliation and unification. , 2006, Ecology.

[25]  R. Courtois,et al.  Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations , 2002 .

[26]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[27]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Testing For Independence of Observations in Animal Movements , 1985 .

[28]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Temporal autocorrelation functions for movement rates from global positioning system radiotelemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Comparison of least-squares cross-validation bandwidth options for kernel home-range estimation , 2003 .

[30]  Peter Leimgruber,et al.  Non‐Markovian maximum likelihood estimation of autocorrelated movement processes , 2014 .

[31]  James E. Dunn,et al.  Analysis of Radio Telemetry Data in Studies of Home Range , 1977 .

[32]  Devin S Johnson,et al.  Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. , 2008, Ecology.