Prepolarized magnetic resonance imaging around metal orthopedic implants

A prepolarized MRI (PMRI) scanner was used to image near metal implants in agar gel phantoms and in in vivo human wrists. Comparison images were made on 1.5‐ and 0.5‐T conventional whole‐body systems. The PMRI experiments were performed in a smaller bore system tailored to extremity imaging with a prepolarization magnetic field of 0.4 T and a readout magnetic field of 27–54 mT (1.1–2.2 MHz). Scan parameters were chosen with equal readout gradient strength over a given field of view and matrix size to allow unbiased evaluation of the benefits of lower readout frequency. Results exhibit substantial reduction in metal susceptibility artifacts under PMRI versus conventional scanners. A new artifact quantification technique is also presented, and phantom results confirm that susceptibility artifacts improve as expected with decreasing readout magnetic field using PMRI. This proof‐of‐concept study demonstrates that prepolarized techniques have the potential to provide diagnostic cross‐sectional images for postoperative evaluation of patients with metal implants. Magn Reson Med. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Skare,et al.  Correction of MR image distortions induced by metallic objects using a 3D cubic B‐spline basis set: Application to stereotactic surgical planning , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Hollis G Potter,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  R. Laskin,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  M A Moerland,et al.  Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 3D. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Z H Cho,et al.  Total inhomogeneity correction including chemical shifts and susceptibility by view angle tilting. , 1988, Medical physics.

[6]  L W Hedlund,et al.  Dynamics of magnetization in hyperpolarized gas MRI of the lung , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  A. Mackay,et al.  Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  E. Melhem,et al.  MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: techniques to minimize susceptibility artefact. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[9]  J Hennig,et al.  RARE imaging: A fast imaging method for clinical MR , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  A E Gross,et al.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[11]  K Farahani,et al.  Effect of field strength on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1990, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[12]  L. Hedlund,et al.  MR Imaging with Hyperpolarized 3He Gas , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  K. Nicolay,et al.  MRI of hip prostheses using single-point methods: in vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  A Macovski,et al.  Novel approaches to low‐cost MRI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  S. Brockstedt,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: Dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Martin P. Mintchev,et al.  Improving geometric accuracy in the presence of susceptibility difference artifacts produced by metallic implants in magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[18]  Qing-San Xiang,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  A Guermazi,et al.  Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[20]  A Macovski,et al.  A readout magnet for prepolarized MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  John S Leigh,et al.  Quantifying arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions with MR , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  NMR imaging in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities and gradient field nonlinearities. , 1985, Medical physics.

[24]  P. Röschmann,et al.  Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. , 1985, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  D. Meier,et al.  MR Imaging of Large Nonferromagnetic Metallic Implants at 1.5 T , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Rapid polarizing field cycling in magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  K. Sekihara,et al.  Image restoration from non-uniform magnetic field influence for direct Fourier NMR imaging. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  D B Plewes,et al.  Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  J. Schenck.  The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[30]  Petros Martirosian,et al.  Metal artifacts caused by gradient switching , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Kim Butts,et al.  Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Takashi Inoue,et al.  Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. Technical note. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[33]  S Li,et al.  A computer simulation of the static magnetic field distribution in the human head , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  S A Gronemeyer,et al.  Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[35]  Steven Kurtz,et al.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  W. Happer,et al.  Biological magnetic resonance imaging using laser-polarized 129Xe , 1994, Nature.