Recall termination in free recall

Although much is known about the dynamics of memory search in the free recall task, relatively little is known about the factors related to recall termination. Reanalyzing individual trial data from 14 prior studies (1,079 participants in 28,015 trials) and defining termination as occurring when a final response is followed by a long nonresponse interval, we observed that termination probability increased throughout the recall period and that retrieval was more likely to terminate following an error than following a correct response. Among errors, termination probability was higher following prior-list intrusions and repetitions than following extralist intrusions. To verify that this pattern of results can be seen in a single study, we report a new experiment in which 80 participants contributed recall data from a total of 9,122 trials. This experiment replicated the pattern observed in the aggregate analysis of the prior studies.

[1]  Donald Laming,et al.  Serial position curves in free recall. , 2010, Psychological review.

[2]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Word Association Spaces for Predicting Semantic Similarity Effects in Episodic Memory. , 2005 .

[3]  Marc W Howard,et al.  Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Michael R Dougherty,et al.  Motivated to retrieve: how often are you willing to go back to the well when the well is dry? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Marc W Howard,et al.  A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. , 2008, Psychological review.

[6]  Marc W Howard,et al.  Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Empirical and theoretical limits on lag recency in free recall , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  G. Buzsáki.  Theta rhythm of navigation: Link between path integration and landmark navigation, episodic and semantic memory , 2005, Hippocampus.

[9]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Aging and contextual binding: Modeling recency and lag recency effects with the temporal context model , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Geoff Ward,et al.  Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: The serial nature of recall and the effect of test expectancy , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[11]  R. Okada,et al.  Interresponse times in single-trial free recall. , 1970 .

[12]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  SAM: A theory of probabilistic search in associative memory. , 1980 .

[13]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  An encoding and retrieval model of single-trial free recall , 1981 .

[14]  E F Loftus,et al.  Creating false memories. , 1997, Scientific American.

[15]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Age dissociates recency and lag recency effects in free recall. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  N. Gee,et al.  Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. , 1998, Psychological review.

[17]  Troy A. Smith,et al.  The fSAM model of false recall. , 2007, Psychological review.

[18]  Marc W. Howard,et al.  Associative Retrieval Processes in Episodic Memory , 2008 .

[19]  Per B. Sederberg,et al.  Oscillatory correlates of the primacy effect in episodic memory , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  Michael Friendly,et al.  The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words , 1982 .

[21]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[22]  R. Lipton,et al.  Memory impairment on free and cued selective reminding predicts dementia , 2000, Neurology.

[23]  J. Wixted,et al.  Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Donna J Bridge.  Memory & Cognition: What difference does gender make? , 2006 .

[25]  Donald Laming,et al.  An improved algorithm for predicting free recalls , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  M. Albert,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission the Lancet Publishing Group. Personal View Mci or Prodromal Ad? Clinical Relevance of the Concept of Mci Clinical Limitations of Mci Amnestic Mci or Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease? , 2022 .

[27]  Marc W Howard,et al.  When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval , 2002 .

[28]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[29]  M. Kahana.  Associative retrieval processes in free recall , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Associative processes in immediate recency , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[31]  D. Laming.  Testing the Idea of Distinct Storage Mechanisms in Memory , 1999 .

[32]  Yevgeniy B. Sirotin,et al.  Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  J. Deese,et al.  Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Marc W. Howard,et al.  A distributed representation of temporal context , 2002 .

[35]  J. Wixted,et al.  An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[36]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[37]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. , 2009, Psychological review.

[38]  Michael J. Kahana,et al.  Effects of adult aging on utilization of temporal and semantic associations during free and serial recall , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[39]  M. Usher,et al.  The demise of short-term memory revisited: empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. , 2005, Psychological review.

[40]  J. Byrne.  Learning and memory : a comprehensive reference , 2008 .