Rat Brain Normalization Templates for Robust Regional Analysis of [11C]ABP688 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

A methodology to generate rat brain templates for spatial normalization of positron emission tomographic (PET)/computed tomographic (CT) images is described and applied to generate three different templates for imaging of [11C]ABP688, a PET ligand binding to the metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor. The templates are based on functional (PET), structural (CT), and combined PET and CT information, respectively. The templates are created from a test–retest study under normal conditions and are used to assess the different templates by using them in the analysis pipeline of a test–retest and a blocking experiment. The resulting average nondisplaceable binding potentials (BPND) show significant (analysis of variance, p < .05) and substantial (up to 23%) differences between the different approaches in several brain regions. The highest BPND values in receptor-rich regions are obtained using the PET-based approach. This approach also had the smallest variability in all tested regions (standard error of measurement of 9% versus 14% [PET/CT] and 20% [CT]). All approaches showed similar relative changes in BPND values with increased blocking. Taken together, these results suggest that the use of the tracer-specific PET-based template outperforms the other approaches with the performance of the combined PET/CT template between those of the PET and the tracer-independent CT template.

[1]  Ralph Myers,et al.  Assessment of Spatial Normalization of PET Ligand Images Using Ligand-Specific Templates , 1999, NeuroImage.

[2]  A. Aliaga,et al.  In vivo and in vitro Validation of Reference Tissue Models for the mGluR5 Ligand [11C]ABP688 , 2010, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  A. Aliaga,et al.  Test‐retest stability of cerebral mGluR5 quantification using [11C]ABP688 and positron emission tomography in rats , 2012, Synapse.

[4]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Atlas Construction for Dynamic (4D) PET Using Diffeomorphic Transformations , 2013, MICCAI.

[5]  M. Otagiri,et al.  In Vivo Kinetic Analysis of Covalent Binding Between N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine and Plasma Protein Through the Formation of Mixed Disulfide in Rats , 2002, Pharmaceutical Research.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[7]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Reproducible Analysis of Rat Brain PET Studies Using an Additional [18F]NaF Scan and an MR-Based ROI Template , 2012, International journal of molecular imaging.

[8]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[9]  Martin Gotthardt,et al.  Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity of the Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Qinan Bao,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Inveon Dedicated PET Preclinical Tomograph Based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Andrea Bergmann,et al.  Statistical Parametric Mapping The Analysis Of Functional Brain Images , 2016 .

[12]  Jin Su Kim,et al.  The Effect of Attenuation and Scatter Correction in Rat Brain PET , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Linearized Reference Tissue Parametric Imaging Methods: Application to [11C]DASB Positron Emission Tomography Studies of the Serotonin Transporter in Human Brain , 2003, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[14]  Nasser Kehtarnavaz,et al.  Brain Functional Localization: A Survey of Image Registration Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[16]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Influence of the normalization template on the outcome of statistical parametric mapping of PET scans , 2003, NeuroImage.

[17]  Lisa A. Weissfeld,et al.  Assessment of parameter settings for SPM5 spatial normalization of structural MRI data: Application to type 2 diabetes , 2008, NeuroImage.

[18]  Jogeshwar Mukherjee,et al.  Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Mark E. Schmidt,et al.  N-Acetylcysteine– and MK-801–Induced Changes in Glutamate Levels Do Not Affect In Vivo Binding of Metabotropic Glutamate 5 Receptor Radioligand 11C-ABP688 in Rat Brain , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Average Brain Models: A Convergence Study , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[21]  Patrick L Chow,et al.  Attenuation correction for small animal PET tomographs , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  A. Aliaga,et al.  In vivo and in vitro validation of reference tissue models for the mGluR 5 ligand [ 11 C ] ABP 688 , 2010 .

[23]  Christopher Coello,et al.  Anatomical standardization of small animal brain FDG-PET images using synthetic functional template: Experimental comparison with anatomical template , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[25]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[26]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Construction and evaluation of multitracer small-animal PET probabilistic atlases for voxel-based functional mapping of the rat brain. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  Jesper L. R. Andersson,et al.  A template for spatial normalisation of MR images of the rat brain , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Kathleen Vunckx,et al.  Construction and Evaluation of Quantitative Small-Animal PET Probabilistic Atlases for [18F]FDG and [18F]FECT Functional Mapping of the Mouse Brain , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Anat Biegon,et al.  Serial microPET measures of the metabolic reaction to a microdialysis probe implant , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  F. J. Dudek The Continuing Misinterpretation of the Standard Error of Measurement , 1979 .