Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID

Abstract Within EU FP7 project NANOVALID, the (eco)toxicity of 7 well-characterized engineered nanomaterials (NMs) was evaluated by 15 bioassays in 4 laboratories. The highest tested nominal concentration of NMs was 100 mg/l. The panel of the bioassays yielded the following toxicity order: Ag > ZnO > CuO > TiO2 > MWCNTs > SiO2 > Au. Ag, ZnO and CuO proved very toxic in the majority of assays, assumingly due to dissolution. The latter was supported by the parallel analysis of the toxicity of respective soluble metal salts. The most sensitive tests/species were Daphnia magna (towards Ag NMs, 24-h EC50 = 0.003 mg Ag/l), algae Raphidocelis subcapitata (ZnO and CuO, 72-h EC50 = 0.14 mg Zn/l and 0.7 mg Cu/l, respectively) and murine fibroblasts BALB/3T3 (CuO, 48-h EC50 = 0.7 mg Cu/l). MWCNTs showed toxicity only towards rat alveolar macrophages (EC50 = 15.3 mg/l) assumingly due to high aspect ratio and TiO2 towards R. subcapitata (EC50 = 6.8 mg Ti/l) due to agglomeration of TiO2 and entrapment of algal cells. Finally, we constructed a decision tree to select the bioassays for hazard ranking of NMs. For NM testing, we recommend a multitrophic suite of 4 in vitro (eco)toxicity assays: 48-h D. magna immobilization (OECD202), 72-h R. subcapitata growth inhibition (OECD201), 30-min Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition (ISO2010) and 48-h murine fibroblast BALB/3T3 neutral red uptake in vitro (OECD129) representing crustaceans, algae, bacteria and mammalian cells, respectively. Notably, our results showed that these assays, standardized for toxicity evaluation of “regular” chemicals, proved efficient also for shortlisting of hazardous NMs. Additional assays are recommended for immunotoxicity evaluation of high aspect ratio NMs (such as MWCNTs).

[1]  Anne Kahru,et al.  LuxCDABE—Transformed Constitutively Bioluminescent Escherichia coli for Toxicity Screening: Comparison with Naturally Luminous Vibrio fischeri , 2011, Sensors.

[2]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Better safe than sorry: Understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles manufactured for biomedical applications. , 2010, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[3]  Robert Rallo,et al.  Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials. , 2011, ACS nano.

[4]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for thought ... on alternative methods for nanoparticle safety testing. , 2010, ALTEX.

[5]  M. Mortimer,et al.  Ecotoxicity of nanoparticles of CuO and ZnO in natural water. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[6]  A. Maynard.  Navigating the risk landscape. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[7]  Dries Knapen,et al.  Aquatic acute species sensitivity distributions of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Joel G. Pounds,et al.  Dysregulation of macrophage activation profiles by engineered nanoparticles. , 2013, ACS nano.

[9]  Yu-Jin Shin,et al.  Conducting a battery of bioassays for gold nanoparticles to derive guideline value for the protection of aquatic ecosystems , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[10]  Greg . Smith,et al.  The effect of environmentally relevant conditions on PVP stabilised gold nanoparticles. , 2013, Chemosphere.

[11]  David B Warheit,et al.  How meaningful are risk determinations in the absence of a complete dataset? Making the case for publishing standardized test guideline and ‘no effect’ studies for evaluating the safety of nanoparticulates versus spurious ‘high effect’ results from single investigative studies , 2015, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[12]  Harald F Krug,et al.  Nanosafety research--are we on the right track? , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  M. Petró‐Turza,et al.  The International Organization for Standardization. , 2003 .

[14]  A E Nel,et al.  Implementation of alternative test strategies for the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials , 2013, Journal of internal medicine.

[15]  H. Niiyama,et al.  Quantitative determination of apoptotic death in cultured human pancreatic cancer cells by propidium iodide and digitonin. , 1999, Cancer letters.

[16]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Efficient internalization of mesoporous silica particles of different sizes by primary human macrophages without impairment of macrophage clearance of apoptotic or antibody-opsonized target cells. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[17]  Guangchao Chen,et al.  Summary and Analysis of the Currently Existing Literature Data on Metal-based Nanoparticles Published for Selected Aquatic Organisms: Applicability for Toxicity Prediction by (Q)SARs , 2015, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[18]  Xiao Ying Xu,et al.  Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles: mechanisms, characterization, and avoiding experimental artefacts. , 2015, Small.

[19]  Nicklas Raun Jacobsen,et al.  Bioaccumulation and ecotoxicity of carbon nanotubes , 2013, Chemistry Central Journal.

[20]  Lang Tran,et al.  Comprehensive In Vitro Toxicity Testing of a Panel of Representative Oxide Nanomaterials: First Steps towards an Intelligent Testing Strategy , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Mechanisms of carbon nanotube-induced toxicity: focus on pulmonary inflammation. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[22]  Ying Wang,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in drug delivery and biomedical applications. , 2015, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[23]  M. Mortimer,et al.  Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review , 2013, Archives of Toxicology.

[24]  K. Kasemets,et al.  Toxicity of nanoparticles of CuO, ZnO and TiO2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Yongsheng Chen,et al.  Mechanism of photogenerated reactive oxygen species and correlation with the antibacterial properties of engineered metal-oxide nanoparticles. , 2012, ACS nano.

[26]  D. Blacker.  Food for thought. , 2013, JAMA neurology.

[27]  S. Pokhrel,et al.  Toxicity of 12 metal-based nanoparticles to algae, bacteria and protozoa , 2015 .

[28]  Xiang Wang,et al.  Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[29]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies , 2009 .

[30]  I. Pyykkö,et al.  Toxicity of silver nanoparticle in rat ear and BALB/c 3T3 cell line , 2014, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[31]  Dominique Lison,et al.  The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity , 2010, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[32]  A. Kahru,et al.  From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology. , 2010, Toxicology.

[33]  T. Mosmann.  Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[34]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Species sensitivity distributions for engineered nanomaterials. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  K. Dawson,et al.  Interaction of gold nanoparticles and nickel(II) sulfate affects dendritic cell maturation , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[36]  Dominic A Notter,et al.  Are nanosized or dissolved metals more toxic in the environment? A meta‐analysis , 2014, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[37]  Anne Kahru,et al.  Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[38]  Sara Novak,et al.  An interlaboratory comparison of nanosilver characterisation and hazard identification: Harmonising techniques for high quality data. , 2016, Environment international.

[39]  Dale A Pelletier,et al.  Relating nanomaterial properties and microbial toxicity. , 2013, Nanoscale.

[40]  Claudia Röhl,et al.  Manufactured nanomaterials: categorization and approaches to hazard assessment , 2014, Archives of Toxicology.

[41]  Teresa F. Fernandes,et al.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far? , 2012, Ecotoxicology.

[42]  Anne Kahru,et al.  The Effect of Composition of Different Ecotoxicological Test Media on Free and Bioavailable Copper from CuSO4 and CuO Nanoparticles: Comparative Evidence from a Cu-Selective Electrode and a Cu-Biosensor , 2011, Sensors.

[43]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  A complementary definition of nanomaterial , 2010 .

[44]  Biological reactivity of TiO2 nanoparticles assessed by ex vivo testing , 2012, Protoplasma.

[45]  Lennart Möller,et al.  Intracellular uptake and toxicity of Ag and CuO nanoparticles: a comparison between nanoparticles and their corresponding metal ions. , 2013, Small.

[46]  Joseph Chakman,et al.  Enough is enough , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[47]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[48]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Grouping and Read-Across Approaches for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[49]  A. Ivask,et al.  Profiling of the reactive oxygen species-related ecotoxicity of CuO, ZnO, TiO2, silver and fullerene nanoparticles using a set of recombinant luminescent Escherichia coli strains: differentiating the impact of particles and solubilised metals , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[50]  C. Kimmel,et al.  Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish , 1995, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[51]  A. Ivask,et al.  Particle-Cell Contact Enhances Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles , 2013, PloS one.

[52]  Vambola Kisand,et al.  Toxicity of 11 Metal Oxide Nanoparticles to Three Mammalian Cell Types In Vitro. , 2015, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[53]  M. Alpers,et al.  Alternative methods in toxicology: pre-validated and validated methods , 2011, Interdisciplinary toxicology.

[54]  Youn-Joo An,et al.  Multispecies toxicity test for silver nanoparticles to derive hazardous concentration based on species sensitivity distribution for the protection of aquatic ecosystems , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[55]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  A critical appraisal of existing concepts for the grouping of nanomaterials. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[56]  N. V. von Moos,et al.  Oxidative stress induced by inorganic nanoparticles in bacteria and aquatic microalgae – state of the art and knowledge gaps , 2014, Nanotoxicology.

[57]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making. , 2015, ACS nano.

[58]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[59]  Yoshihisa Hagihara,et al.  Association of the physical and chemical properties and the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles: metal ion release, adsorption ability and specific surface area. , 2012, Metallomics : integrated biometal science.

[60]  A. Ivask,et al.  A novel method for comparison of biocidal properties of nanomaterials to bacteria, yeasts and algae. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.

[61]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes) , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[62]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[63]  G. Libralato,et al.  Manufactured nanoparticles in the aquatic environment-biochemical responses on freshwater organisms: A critical overview. , 2016, Aquatic toxicology.

[64]  H. Kalantari,et al.  Nanotoxicology , 2013, Jundishapur journal of natural pharmaceutical products.

[65]  Nanna B. Hartmann,et al.  Adapting OECD Aquatic Toxicity Tests for Use with Manufactured Nanomaterials: Key Issues and Consensus Recommendations. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[66]  Katre Juganson,et al.  NanoE-Tox: New and in-depth database concerning ecotoxicity of nanomaterials , 2015, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.