Human or Robot? Consumer Responses to Radical Cognitive Enhancement Products

Human enhancement products allow consumers to radically enhance their mental abilities. Focusing on cognitive enhancements, we introduce and study a novel factor—dehumanization (i.e., denying a person emotional ability and likening them to a robot)—which plays a key role in consumers’ reluctance to use enhancement products. In study 1, consumers who enhance their mental abilities beyond normal levels were dehumanized, whereas consumers who use the same products to restore lost abilities were not. Moreover, dehumanization decreased prospective consumers’ interest in using the enhancement products themselves. Study 2 shows that emphasizing how the motivation to use an enhancement product can be prosocial (i.e., helping other people) inoculates the consumer against dehumanization, and study 3 supports this positioning strategy in an online advertising campaign. Together, these studies uncover dehumanization as an important obstacle to consumer adoption of enhancement products and demonstrate how to overcome this obstacle with a prosocial positioning strategy.

[1]  J. Savulescu.  New breeds of humans: the moral obligation to enhance. , 2005, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[2]  H. S. Schoeman,et al.  President's Council , 2008 .

[3]  Todd W. Thompson,et al.  Enhancing cognition using transcranial electrical stimulation , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[4]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[5]  Victoria Saigle,et al.  The Rising Tide of tDCS in the Media and Academic Literature , 2014, Neuron.

[6]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[7]  Nicolas Kervyn de Meerendré.  Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. , 2012 .

[8]  Nicholas S. Fitz,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement , 2014 .

[9]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice , 1996 .

[10]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach , 2018 .

[11]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures , 2008 .

[12]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  N. Bostrom.  Why I Want to be a Posthuman when I Grow Up , 2013 .

[14]  Geoffrey P. Goodwin,et al.  Preferences for Enhancement Pharmaceuticals: The Reluctance to Enhance Fundamental Traits , 2008 .

[15]  Elanor F Williams,et al.  Double Standards in the Use of Enhancing Products By Self and Others , 2014 .

[16]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  M. Norton,et al.  Botsourcing and outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German workers are for thinking--not feeling--jobs. , 2014, Emotion.

[18]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Assessing the moderating effect of consumer product knowledge and online shopping experience on using recommendation agents for customer loyalty , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  N. Haslam,et al.  Universal biases in self-perception: better and more human than average. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[20]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions , 2017 .

[21]  N. Haslam,et al.  Dehumanization and infrahumanization. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance , 2003 .

[23]  Michael I. Norton,et al.  Aid in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of Secondary Emotions and Intergroup Helping , 2007 .

[24]  John Harris,et al.  Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy , 2008, Nature.

[25]  Kurt Gray,et al.  Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  A. Waytz,et al.  A Superhumanization Bias in Whites’ Perceptions of Blacks , 2015 .

[27]  K. Chinthapalli.  The billion dollar business of being smart , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  A. Markman,et al.  Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products , 2001 .

[29]  N. Haslam,et al.  Essentialist Beliefs about Personality and Their Implications , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  Efthimios Parasidis.  33. Human Enhancement and Experimental Research in the Military , 2012 .

[31]  Eric Racine,et al.  Cognitive Enhancement, Lifestyle Choice or Misuse of Prescription Drugs? , 2010 .

[32]  Heidi Ledford,et al.  CRISPR, the disruptor , 2015, Nature.

[33]  N. Haslam.  Dehumanization: An Integrative Review , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  N. Haslam,et al.  More human than you: attributing humanness to self and others. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Alexander P. Henkel,et al.  Discounting Humanity: When Consumers are Price Conscious, Employees Appear Less Human , 2018 .

[36]  C. Dweck,et al.  Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  N. Epley,et al.  The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle , 2014 .

[38]  P. Gordon,et al.  Our Posthuman Future , 2014 .

[39]  S. Schnall,et al.  The Ethics of “Smart Drugs”: Moral Judgments About Healthy People's Use of Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs , 2012 .