Instance-Based Ontological Knowledge Acquisition

The Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud contains tremendous amounts of interlinked instances, from where we can retrieve abundant knowledge. However, because of the heterogeneous and big ontologies, it is time consuming to learn all the ontologies manually and it is difficult to observe which properties are important for describing instances of a specific class. In order to construct an ontology that can help users easily access to various data sets, we propose a semi-automatic ontology integration framework that can reduce the heterogeneity of ontologies and retrieve frequently used core properties for each class. The framework consists of three main components: graph-based ontology integration, machine-learning-based ontology schema extraction, and an ontology merger. By analyzing the instances of the linked data sets, this framework acquires ontological knowledge and constructs a high-quality integrated ontology, which is easily understandable and effective in knowledge acquisition from various data sets using simple SPARQL queries.

[1]  L. Stein,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language - Reference , 2004 .

[2]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[3]  Johanna Völker,et al.  Learning Disjointness for Debugging Mappings between Lightweight Ontologies , 2008, EKAW.

[4]  Tom Heath,et al.  Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space , 2011, Linked Data.

[5]  Ryutaro Ichise,et al.  Graph-based ontology analysis in the linked open data , 2012, I-SEMANTICS '12.

[6]  Ryutaro Ichise,et al.  Detecting Hidden Relations in Geographic Data , 2010 .

[7]  Christian Bizer,et al.  Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space , 2011, BNCOD.

[8]  Stefan Wrobel,et al.  Machine Learning: ECML-95 , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Ryutaro Ichise An Analysis of Multiple Similarity Measures for Ontology Mapping Problem , 2010, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[10]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases , 1994, VLDB.

[11]  W. Winkler Overview of Record Linkage and Current Research Directions , 2006 .

[12]  J. Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching , 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[13]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language Reference-W3C Recommen-dation , 2004 .

[14]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Knowledge Engineering: Practice and Patterns, 16th International Conference, EKAW 2008, Acitrezza, Italy, September 29 - October 2, 2008. Proceedings , 2008, EKAW.

[15]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Fast algorithms for mining association rules , 1998, VLDB 1998.

[16]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  WordNet::Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts , 2004, NAACL.

[17]  Craig A. Knoblock,et al.  Discovering Concept Coverings in Ontologies of Linked Data Sources , 2012, International Semantic Web Conference.

[18]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[19]  Jeff Heflin,et al.  The Semantic Web – ISWC 2012 , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[20]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010: 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I , 2010, SEMWEB.

[21]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Ontology Alignment for Linked Open Data , 2010, SEMWEB.

[22]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  The Power of Decision Tables , 1995, ECML.

[23]  Ryutaro Ichise,et al.  Integrating Ontologies Using Ontology Learning Approach , 2013, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval , 2008 .