Increasing the Transparency of Unmanned Systems: Applications of Ecological Interface Design

This paper describes ongoing efforts to address the challenges of supervising teams of heterogeneous unmanned vehicles through the use of demonstrated Ecological Interface Design EID principles. We first review the EID framework and discuss how we have applied it to the unmanned systems domain. Then, drawing from specific interface examples, we present several generalizable design strategies for improved supervisory control displays. We discuss how ecological display techniques can be used to increase the transparency and observability of highly automated unmanned systems by enabling operators to efficiently perceive and reason about automated support outcomes and purposefully direct system behavior.

[1]  Kevin B. Bennett,et al.  Evaluation of an Ecological Interface Design for Military Command and Control , 2012 .

[2]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decisionmaking and system management , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  K. Monta,et al.  An ecological interface for supervisory control of BWR nuclear power plants , 1995 .

[4]  Ann M. Bisantz,et al.  Assessment of Display Attributes for Displaying Metainformation on Maps , 2006 .

[5]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Mission Planning and Monitoring for Heterogeneous Unmanned Vehicle Teams: A Human-Centered Perspective , 2007 .

[6]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Ecological Interface Design , 2004 .

[7]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Ryan Kilgore,et al.  The Srk Inventory: A Tool for Structuring and Capturing a Worker Competencies Analysis , 2006 .

[9]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Hiroshi Furukawa.  An Ecological Interface Design Approach to Human Supervision of a Robot Team , 2007 .

[11]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[12]  John D. Lee,et al.  Human-Automation Collaboration in Dynamic Mission Planning: A Challenge Requiring an Ecological Approach , 2006 .

[13]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological interface design for petrochemical applications: supporting operator adaptation , 2001 .

[14]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  The Ecology of Human-Machine Systems II: Mediating 'Direct Perception' in Complex Work Domains , 1990 .

[15]  Gourab Sen Gupta,et al.  Autonomous Robots and Agents , 2007 .

[16]  Regina A. Pomranky,et al.  The role of trust in automation reliance , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[18]  Marcus Watson,et al.  ANESTHESIA MONITORING, ALARM PROLIFERATION, AND ECOLOGICAL INTERFACE DESIGN , 2000 .

[19]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Designing Displays Under Ecological Interface Design: Towards Operationalizing Semantic Mapping , 1998 .

[20]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Predicting the Impact of Heterogeneity on Unmanned-Vehicle Team Performance , 2008 .