Semi-automated relative quantification of cell culture contamination with mycoplasma by Photoshop-based image analysis on immunofluorescence preparations.

Mycoplasma contamination in cell culture is a serious setback for the cell-culturist. The experiments undertaken using contaminated cell cultures are known to yield unreliable or false results due to various morphological, biochemical and genetic effects. Earlier surveys revealed incidences of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures to range from 15 to 80%. Out of a vast array of methods for detecting mycoplasma in cell culture, the cytological methods directly demonstrate the contaminating organism present in association with the cultured cells. In this investigation, we report the adoption of a cytological immunofluorescence assay (IFA), in an attempt to obtain a semi-automated relative quantification of contamination by employing the user-friendly Photoshop-based image analysis. The study performed on 77 cell cultures randomly collected from various laboratories revealed mycoplasma contamination in 18 cell cultures simultaneously by IFA and Hoechst DNA fluorochrome staining methods. It was observed that the Photoshop-based image analysis on IFA stained slides was very valuable as a sensitive tool in providing quantitative assessment on the extent of contamination both per se and in comparison to cellularity of cell cultures. The technique could be useful in estimating the efficacy of anti-mycoplasma agents during decontaminating measures.

[1]  G. Mcgarrity,et al.  Cytogenetic effects of mycoplasmal infection of cell cultures: A review , 2007, In Vitro.

[2]  T. Kozakai,et al.  Rapid detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures using sybr green-based real-time polymerase chain reaction , 2006, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[3]  U. Hadding,et al.  Fast and simple procedure for the detection of cell culture mycoplasmas using a single monoclonal antibody. , 1990, Journal of immunological methods.

[4]  Allen M. Gown,et al.  Complete Chromogen Separation and Analysis in Double Immunohistochemical Stains Using Photoshop-based Image Analysis , 1999, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[5]  H. Drexler,et al.  Mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures: Incidence, sources, effects, detection, elimination, prevention , 2002, Cytotechnology.

[6]  T. Chen,et al.  In situ detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures by fluorescent Hoechst 33258 stain. , 1977, Experimental cell research.

[7]  H. Drexler,et al.  Detection of mycoplasma contaminations. , 2005, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  H. Quentmeier,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of five different mycoplasma detection assays. , 1992, Leukemia.

[9]  Arif Ali,et al.  Effectiveness of a mycoplasma elimination reagent on a mycoplasma-contaminated hybridoma cell line. , 2007, Hybridoma.

[10]  H. Drexler,et al.  Detection of mycoplasma in leukemia–lymphoma cell lines using polymerase chain reaction , 2002, Leukemia.

[11]  R. Wichelhausen,et al.  Contamination of human cell cultures by pleuropneumonialike organisms. , 1956, Science.

[12]  T. Chen,et al.  Mycoplasma infection of cultured cells , 1989, Nature.

[13]  H. Drexler,et al.  Specificity and sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in comparison with other methods for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell lines. , 1993, Journal of immunological methods.

[14]  Tandem use of immunofluorescent and DNA staining assays to validate nested PCR detection of mycoplasma , 2008, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[15]  U. Hadding,et al.  Species differentiation of mycoplasmas by EF-Tu specific monoclonal antibodies. , 1992, Journal of immunological methods.

[16]  H. Drexler,et al.  Mycoplasma contamination in human leukemia cell lines. I. Comparison of various detection methods. , 1992, Journal of immunological methods.