Investigating the effects of operational factors on PEMFC performance based on CFD simulations using a three-level full-factorial design

This study uses the 33 full-factorial design, a factorial arrangement with three factors at three-levels, to investigate the main and interaction effects of design parameters on the performance of a single 25 cm2 PEMFC cell. The factors considered in this study include the flow channel design, the operational temperature, and the relative humidity of the cathode gas mixture. The gas flow channel patterns for both the anode side and the cathode side are the same as a straight parallel channel design and two modified parallel channel designs. The operational temperatures are selected as 333 K, 343 K, and 353 K. The relative humidity of the cathode gas mixture varies from 50% to 100% at 25% intervals, while the relative humidity of the anode gas mixture remains fixed at 100%. All runs are conducted with a three-dimensional, non-isothermal steady-state fuel cell computational fluid dynamic model (FCFD) with specified boundary conditions. The FCFD model can not only output the polarization curve, but also predict complex multi-physics flow, thermal, mass and ion transport phenomena inside the tiny fuel cell multi-layer structures. This full-factorial design of experimental method reveals that it is possible to not only explore the main effects of this complex multi-physics problem, but also investigate the effects of two-factor interactions for generating maximum power density. Results show that the flow channel design has the most significant effect on the polarization curve; the next is the cell temperature, while the relative humidity of the cathode gas mixture plays only a minor role.

[1]  S. Dutta,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical simulation of straight channel PEM fuel cells , 2000 .

[2]  M. Akbari,et al.  Numerical investigation of flow field configuration and contact resistance for PEM fuel cell performance , 2008 .

[3]  N. Hanspal,et al.  Three-dimensional CFD modelling of PEM fuel cells: an investigation into the effects of water flooding , 2009 .

[4]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of transport and electrochemical reactions in polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2004 .

[5]  R. Kee,et al.  A generalized model of the flow distribution in channel networks of planar fuel cells , 2002 .

[6]  Roberto C. Dante,et al.  Fractional factorial design of experiments for PEM fuel cell performances improvement , 2003 .

[7]  Lin Wang,et al.  A parametric study of PEM fuel cell performances , 2003 .

[8]  Denis Candusso,et al.  Study of gas pressure and flow rate influences on a 500 W PEM fuel cell, thanks to the experimental design methodology , 2006 .

[9]  Ay Su,et al.  A three-dimensional full-cell CFD model used to investigate the effects of different flow channel designs on PEMFC performance , 2007 .

[10]  Shan-Jen Cheng,et al.  Use of metamodeling optimal approach promotes the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) , 2013 .

[11]  Mark W. Verbrugge,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Solid‐Polymer‐Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 1992 .

[12]  Frano Barbir,et al.  An Analytical Solution of a Half‐Cell Model for PEM Fuel Cells , 2000 .

[13]  Harvey G. Stenger,et al.  Main and interaction effects of PEM fuel cell design parameters , 2006 .

[14]  Ay Su,et al.  The impact of flow field pattern on concentration and performance in PEMFC , 2005 .

[15]  Dirk Riemann,et al.  Low temperature operation and influence parameters on the cold start ability of portable PEMFCs , 2006 .

[16]  Massimo Santarelli,et al.  Experimental analysis of the CHP performance of a PEMFC stack by a 24 factorial design , 2005 .

[17]  A. Shukla,et al.  Diffusion layer parameters influencing optimal fuel cell performance , 2000 .

[18]  S. Kaytakoğlu,et al.  Optimization of parametric performance of a PEMFC , 2007 .

[19]  S. Dutta,et al.  Numerical prediction of mass-exchange between cathode and anode channels in a PEM fuel cell , 2001 .

[20]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical simulation of the transport phenomena in the cathodic side of a PEMFC , 2004 .

[21]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2000 .

[22]  Wan Ramli Wan Daud,et al.  Challenges and future developments in proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2006 .

[23]  T. Fuller,et al.  Water and Thermal Management in Solid‐Polymer‐Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 1993 .

[24]  Ned Djilali,et al.  Computational model of a PEM fuel cell with serpentine gas flow channels , 2004 .

[25]  Ned Djilali,et al.  Three-dimensional computational analysis of transport phenomena in a PEM fuel cell—a parametric study , 2003 .

[26]  Klaus Hinkelmann,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiment , 1975 .

[27]  Loreto Daza,et al.  Optimisation of flow-field in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells using computational fluid dynamics techniques , 2000 .

[28]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Technical, environmental and exergetic aspects of hydrogen energy systems , 2002 .

[29]  Viktor Hacker,et al.  Experimental analysis of internal gas flow configurations for a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack , 2008 .