Analysis of dynamics properties of ankle joint during push-forward disturbance rejection

Ankle joint dynamics properties have been widely studied because of their important role in interaction with environment. In this paper, these properties were studied under the experimental condition of push-recovery. The disturbance was exerted on backs of subjects. The amplitude of disturbance was limited so that only ankle joint strategy was evoked, without foot tilting. A data-synchronized-collection system was developed to measure ankle joint kinematics, kinetics and sEMG information. Ankle joint mechanical impedance, i.e. torque adjustment corresponding to joint angle, was investigated together with sEMG of antagonistic and agonistic muscles. Despite of complication of muscle-skeleton structure and central nervous system, a simple control mechanism was observed, describing by linear and quadratic polynomials with high correlation coefficient. Experimental results also indicated that the reflex-like behavior takes charge with the resistant torque generation at the first moment, helping to adjust ankle joint mechanical impedance. Furthermore, SOL muscle activation level had a linear relationship with ankle joint kinematics data. This pilot study is as one part of our investigation of human push-recovery ability, which tries to reveal the mechanism of ankle dynamics and helps to improve bipedal robot balance capability.

[1]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural feedback responses scale with biomechanical constraints in human standing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  I W Hunter,et al.  Human ankle joint stiffness over the full range of muscle activation levels. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  R. Kearney,et al.  Intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness: variation with activation level and position , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  D. Winter,et al.  Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  N. Hogan,et al.  Multivariable static ankle mechanical impedance with relaxed muscles. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Andrew C Laing,et al.  The influence of ankle muscle activation on postural sway during quiet stance. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[7]  Yasin Y. Dhaher,et al.  Contributions of feed-forward and feedback strategies at the human ankle during control of unstable loads , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Hartmut Geyer,et al.  Control of a Powered Ankle–Foot Prosthesis Based on a Neuromuscular Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  James M. Finley,et al.  Acceleration dependence and task-specific modulation of short- and medium-latency reflexes in the ankle extensors , 2013, Physiological reports.

[10]  N. Hogan,et al.  Multivariable Dynamic Ankle Mechanical Impedance With Active Muscles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Nitish Thatte,et al.  Towards local reflexive control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis for robust amputee push and trip recovery , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Postural proprioceptive reflexes in standing human subjects: bandwidth of response and transmission characteristics. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Muscle stiffness in human ankle dorsiflexors: intrinsic and reflex components. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Motoki Kouzaki,et al.  Importance of body sway velocity information in controlling ankle extensor activities during quiet stance. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  R. Peterka Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.