Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector

Information-sharing projects are becoming increasingly important in both public and private organizations. Generally, organizations base their decision to move forward with an information-sharing project on the project's expected benefits such as better services, operational savings, and increased program effectiveness. Clearly, potential impediments particular to the government environment could limit the attainment of benefits, jeopardizing the project's business case and even the project itself. Yet, we know very little about how users’ perceived impediments affect a project's expected benefits in collaborative digital government initiatives. Using data from six public sector information-sharing projects, this paper reveals how some managerial and cultural impediments (e.g., control-oriented management) limit perceptions of expected benefits. Surprisingly, political impediments were not found to significantly affect the expectations of benefits. Additionally, the paper provides managers with specific advice on how to better understand users’ perceptions and expectations. The paper should be of interest to both academicians and practitioners who are interested in government information technology implementation, in general, and collaborative e-Government, in particular.

[1]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  She-I Chang,et al.  A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues , 2000, ICIS.

[3]  David Landsbergen,et al.  ELIMINATING LEGAL AND POLICY BARRIERS TO INTEROPERABLE GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[4]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  Rationality in Psychology and Economics , 1986 .

[7]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[8]  Antonio Leal,et al.  A Validation Test of an Adaptation of the DeLone and McLean’s Model in the Spanish EIS Field 1 , 2002 .

[9]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  A. Cresswell,et al.  Developing a Business Case for the Integration of Criminal Justice Information , 2000 .

[12]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[13]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[14]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  Understanding Interorganizational Cooperation: Public-Private Collaboration in Regulating Financial Market Innovation , 2001 .

[15]  Richard E. Walton,et al.  Up and Running: Integrating Information Technology and the Organization , 1989 .

[16]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Participants' Expectations and the Success of Knowledge Networking in the Public Sector , 2002 .

[17]  Niek F. du Plooy Information systems as social systems , 2003 .

[18]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[19]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  David Rowe,et al.  Up and Running , 1993 .

[21]  John Leslie King,et al.  Managing Information Systems: Change and Control in Organizational Computing , 1989 .

[22]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Making Smart IT Choices Understanding Value and Risk in Government IT Investments , 2004 .

[23]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  The initiation and adoption of client-server technology in organizations , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Janice H. Hammond,et al.  REENGINEERING CHANNEL REORDERING PROCESSES TO IMPROVE TOTAL SUPPLY‐CHAIN PERFORMANCE , 1997 .

[25]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Dimensions of Information Systems Success , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Alan R. Heminger,et al.  Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[28]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Exploring E-Government Benefits and Success Factors , 2007 .

[29]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Up and Running. Integrating Information Technology and the Organization , 1991, J. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Internal and external interorganizational relationships and their impact on the adoption of new technology: An exploratory study , 1994 .

[31]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  The Appeal and Difficulties of Participative Systems , 1995 .

[32]  Debra L. Nelson,et al.  Individual Adjustment to Information-Driven Technologies: A Critical Review , 1990, MIS Q..

[33]  M. Crozier The Bureaucratic Phenomenon , 1964 .

[34]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[35]  G. Garson Toward an information technology research agenda for public administration , 2003 .

[36]  S. Dawes Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks , 1996 .

[37]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[38]  K. Kraemer INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM: WILL THE TIME AFTER E-GOVERNMENT BE DIFFERENT? , 2003 .

[39]  Kelly D. Edmiston State And Local E-Government , 2003 .

[40]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  Peter Flett,et al.  Managing Information & Systems , 2006 .

[43]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[44]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[45]  LeeJae-Nam The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001 .

[46]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  Richard Heeks Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform , 2002 .

[48]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  A logic programming framework for planning and simulation , 1986 .

[49]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action. , 1980 .

[50]  John Child,et al.  Organizations As Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: the Case of China , 1999 .

[51]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[53]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[54]  V. Bekkers Reinventing government in the information age. International practice in IT-enabled public sector reform , 2003 .

[55]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[56]  Elisabeth J. Umble,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[57]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  L. Caffrey Information Sharing between and within Governments , 2000 .

[59]  P McCaffreyDavid,et al.  Understanding Interorganizational Cooperation , 2001 .

[60]  L. Hosmer TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS , 1995 .

[61]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[62]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Interorganizational Information Integration in the Criminal Justice Enterprise: Preliminary Lessons from State and County Initiatives , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[63]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services , 2004, CACM.

[64]  Richard Heeks Reinventing Government in the Information Age , 1999 .

[65]  Kenneth L. Kraemer Managing information systems : change and control in organizational computing , 1989 .

[66]  Per V. Jenster Firm Performance and Monitoring of Critical Success Factors in Different Strategic Contexts , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Priscilla M. Regan,et al.  Developing Intranets for Agency Management , 2003 .

[68]  Martha Derthick,et al.  Agency under Stress: The Social Security Administration in American Government. , 1992 .

[69]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems - Systemic constraints and effective practices , 2002, Advances in Digital Government.

[70]  Richard Greene,et al.  Powering Up: How Public Managers Can Take Control of Information Technology , 2000 .

[71]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[72]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[73]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[74]  David Landsbergen,et al.  Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology , 2001 .

[75]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[76]  Shirin Madon,et al.  Governance lessons from the experience of telecentres in Kerala , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[77]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  UNDERSTANDING INTERORGANIZATIONAL COOPERATION: PUBLIC-PRIVATE COLLABORATION IN REGULATING FINANCIAL MARKET INNOVATION. , 1999 .

[78]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information systems success revisited , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[79]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[80]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[81]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Data Integration and Access - The Digital Government Research Center's Energy Data Collection (EDC) Project , 2002, Advances in Digital Government.

[82]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[83]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Government Information Management: A Primer and Casebook , 1991 .

[84]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[85]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Managing information systems , 1989 .