Structural Similarity-Based Approximation of Signals and Images Using Orthogonal Bases

The structural similarity (SSIM) index has been shown to be an useful tool in a wide variety of applications that involve the assessment of image quality and similarity. However, in-depth studies are still lacking on how to incorporate it for signal representation and approximation problems, where minimal mean squared error is still the dominant optimization criterion. Here we examine the problem of best approximation of signals and images by maximizing the SSIM between them. In the case of a decomposition of a signal in terms of an orthonormal basis, the optimal SSIM-based coefficients are determined with a surprisingly simple approach, namely, a scaling of the optimal L2 coefficients. We then examine a very simple algorithm to maximize SSIM with a constrained number of basis functions. The algorithm is applied to the DCT approximation of images.

[1]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Rate Bounds on SSIM Index of Quantized Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Maximum differentiation (MAD) competition: a methodology for comparing computational models of perceptual quantities. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[3]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Perceptual Image Coding Based on a Maximum of Minimal Structural Similarity Criterion , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and divisive normalization: Modeling nonlinearity and adaptation in cortical neurons , 2002 .

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[6]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Design of Linear Equalizers Optimized for the Structural Similarity Index , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function , 2002 .

[8]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  SSIM-optimal linear image restoration , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[9]  James A. Storer,et al.  DATA COMPRESSION CONFERENCE , 2001 .

[10]  Guy Wallis,et al.  The prototype effect revisited: Evidence for an abstract feature model of face recognition. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[11]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Thomas Richter,et al.  A MS-SSIM Optimal JPEG 2000 Encoder , 2009, 2009 Data Compression Conference.