Three-Dimensional Data Quality Assessment: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry and Mobile Laser Scanner

With significantly rapid in acquiring data and sufficient data quality, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry and land based mobile laser scanner are actively implemented in three-dimensional (3D) data acquisition that involve with large area. Considering the final data provided by both measurement approaches are point clouds, accuracy assessment using several well-distributed control points are less significant. With intention to robustly evaluate the accuracies of both measurement approaches using point clouds, this study has established reference point clouds using terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and tacheometry techniques. At the similar test site, fourteen (14) images were captured using UAV photogrammetry approach and georeferenced point clouds were directly acquired from MLS measurement. To produce quality point clouds from photogrammetry approach, six (6) ground control points (GCP) have been well-distributed at the test area to aid geometry correction in image processing phase. Obtained point clouds from both measurement approaches were deviated with the reference point clouds to determine values of mean deviations with the precisions. Based on law of propagation of variance (LOPOV) algorithm, final accuracy of the tested UAV photogrammetry and MLS were computed by propagating the accuracy of reference point clouds and yielded mean deviations of both approaches. Consider the theories and constraints for both approaches, it is found that the yielded accuracies are meet the measurement principles.

[1]  Halim Setan,et al.  Improvement in accuracy for three-dimensional sensor (FaroPhoton 120 scanner) , 2013 .

[2]  J. Gonçalves,et al.  UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas , 2015 .

[3]  Pedro Arias,et al.  Land-Based Mobile Laser Scanning Systems: a Review , 2012 .

[4]  T. Rabbani,et al.  Automatic reconstruction of industrial installations using point clouds and images , 2006 .

[5]  Margherita Fiani,et al.  Uncertainty in Terrestrial Laser Scanner Surveys of Landslides , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Gianni Bartoli,et al.  Advanced procedure for documenting and assessment of Cultural Heritage: from Laser Scanning to Finite Element. , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[7]  Frank Vermeulen,et al.  Mapping by matching: a computer vision-based approach to fast and accurate georeferencing of archaeological aerial photographs , 2012 .

[8]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[9]  LIN Zongjian,et al.  UAV FOR MAPPING — LOW ALTITUDE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEY , 2008 .

[10]  Yuwei Chen,et al.  Multiplatform Mobile Laser Scanning: Usability and Performance , 2012, Sensors.

[11]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  An on-site approach for the self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanner , 2014 .

[12]  P. Barry,et al.  FIELD ACCURACY TEST OF RPAS PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2013 .

[13]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[14]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Error Analysis and Accuracy Assessment of Mobile Laser Scanning System , 2015 .

[15]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR MAPPING AND 3D MODELING - CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES - , 2012 .

[16]  Gerhard Navratil,et al.  Adjustment computations: spatial data analysis , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Martyna Poreba,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of land-based mobile laser scanning data , 2012 .

[19]  Zulkepli Majid,et al.  Data quality assurance for hybrid and panoramic scanners via self-calibration , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT).

[20]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[21]  D. Dorling,et al.  Mapping: Ways of Representing the World , 2014 .

[22]  R. Kromer,et al.  Managing rockfall risk through baseline monitoring of precursors using a terrestrial laser scanner , 2017 .

[24]  Halim Setan,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanners Pre-Processing: Registration and Georeferencing , 2014 .

[25]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Constantine E. Kontokosta,et al.  Large-scale parameterization of 3D building morphology in complex urban landscapes using aerial LiDAR and city administrative data , 2019, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[27]  Pedro Arias,et al.  Photogrammetry and laser scanner technology applied to length measurements in car testing laboratories , 2012 .

[28]  Charles D. Ghilani,et al.  Elementary Surveying: An Introduction to Geomatics , 2005 .

[29]  3 D CITY MODELLING OF ISTANBUL HISTORIC PENINSULA BY COMBINATION OF AERIAL IMAGES AND TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING DATA , 2008 .

[30]  S. F. Saghravani,et al.  ACCURACY COMPARISON OF RTK-GPS AND AUTOMATIC LEVEL FOR HEIGHT DETERMINATION IN LAND SURVEYING , 2009 .

[31]  Branko Glisic,et al.  Virtual tours and informational modeling for conservation of cultural heritage sites , 2017 .