The interactive effects of monetary incentive justification and questionnaire length on mail survey response rates

An experiment was conducted in which a survey questionnaire and a $1.00 incentive were sent to 200 randomly selected residents of a midwestern city. For half of the respondents, the enclosed monetary incentive was justified in a cover letter as an attempt to induce feelings of obligation to return the questionnaire (equity-salient condition), whereas for the other half of the respondents, the incentive was justified as an appreciative gesture (standard condition). Furthermore, some subjects received a short questionnaire, whereas the rest received a long questionnaire. Response rates were assessed by condition. As predicted, the equity-salient appeal produced a significantly higher response rate than the standard appeal, but only for subjects who received the short questionnaire. Results are discussed in terms of personal equity theory. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  Paul M. Biner,et al.  Justifying the enclosure of monetary incentives in mail survey cover letters , 1990 .

[2]  Paul M. Biner,et al.  Effects of Cover Appeal and Monetary Incentives on Survey Response: A Reactance Theory Application , 1988 .

[3]  Payment and value: The generation of an evaluation standard and its effect on value , 1987 .

[4]  D. H. Furse,et al.  Manipulating dissonance to improve mail survey response , 1984 .

[5]  Joseph G. P. Paolillo,et al.  Monetary Incentives and Mail Questionnaire Response Rates , 1984 .

[6]  H. Cooper,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires , 1983 .

[7]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Monetary Incentives versus Promised Contribution to Charity: New Evidence on Mail Survey Response , 1982 .

[8]  J. J. Seta,et al.  Personal equity: An intrapersonal comparator system analysis of reward value. , 1982 .

[9]  David L. Rados,et al.  Effects of Foot-in-the-Door, Cash Incentives, and Followups on Survey Response , 1981 .

[10]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[11]  Paul B. Sheatsley,et al.  Nonresponse Bias for Attitude Questions , 1981 .

[12]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Failure to Help When in a Hurry: Callousness or Conflict? , 1978 .

[13]  L. Kanuk,et al.  Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review , 1975 .

[14]  A. S. Linsky.  STIMULATING RESPONSES TO MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES: A REVIEW , 1975 .

[15]  J. Hackler,et al.  DOLLARS, DISSONANCE, AND SURVEY RETURNS , 1973 .

[16]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1963 .

[17]  M. N. Donald,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF NONRESPONSE FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE DATA , 1960 .

[18]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .