Systematic Analysis of the Sensor Coverage of Automated Vehicles Using Phenomenological Sensor Models*

The objective of this paper is to propose a systematic analysis of the sensor coverage of automated vehicles. Due to an unlimited number of possible traffic situations, a selection of scenarios to be tested must be applied in the safety assessment of automated vehicles. This paper describes how phenomenological sensor models can be used to identify system-specific relevant scenarios. In automated driving, the following sensors are predominantly used: camera, ultrasonic, Radar and Lidar. Based on the literature, phenomenological models have been developed for the four sensor types, which take into account phenomena such as environmental influences, sensor properties and the type of object to be detected. These phenomenological models have a significantly higher reliability than simple ideal sensor models and require lower computing costs than realistic physical sensor models, which represents an optimal compromise for systematic investigations of sensor coverage. The simulations showed significant differences between different system configurations and thus support the system-specific selection of relevant scenarios for the safety assessment of automated vehicles.

[1]  Olaf Stursberg,et al.  Safety assessment of driving behavior in multi-lane traffic for autonomous vehicles , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[2]  Omar Sonbul,et al.  DETERMINING THE OPERATING DISTANCE OF AIR ULTRASOUND RANGE FINDERS: CALCULATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS , 2014 .

[3]  Albrecht Ludloff,et al.  Praxiswissen Radar und Radarsignalverarbeitung , 1998 .

[4]  Vanessa Picron,et al.  Automatisiertes Fahren undseine Sensorik im Test , 2018 .

[5]  F. Müller Modellierung der Sensorabdeckung autonomer Fahrzeuge zur Berechnung optimaler Annäherungspfade , 2018 .

[6]  Patrice Pajusco,et al.  RCS modeling and measurements for automotive radar applications in the W band , 2017, 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[7]  Robin Schubert,et al.  Simulation of Sensor Models for the Evaluation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems , 2014, ATZelektronik worldwide.

[8]  T. Zwick,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Technology for Automotive Radar Sensors in the 77 GHz Frequency Band , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[9]  Stephen C. Cain,et al.  Direct-Detection Ladar Systems , 2010 .

[10]  Andreas Riener,et al.  Introduction to rain and fog attenuation on automotive surround sensors , 2017, 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[11]  Mark Arend,et al.  SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO CHARACTERIZATION OF COHERENT DOPPLER LIDAR BACKSCATTERED SIGNALS , 2016 .

[12]  Abdelhamid Mellouk,et al.  An Evidence-Based Sensor Coverage Model , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[14]  Lamont V. Blake,et al.  Radar range-performance analysis , 1980 .

[15]  Christian Steger,et al.  Next generation radar sensors in automotive sensor fusion systems , 2017, 2017 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF).

[16]  Jürgen Häring,et al.  A real-time capable multi-sensor model to validate ADAS in a virtual environment , 2017 .

[17]  Thomas Zwick,et al.  RCS measurement results for automotive related objects at 23-27 GHz , 2011, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[18]  Robert Lange,et al.  3D time-of-flight distance measurement with custom solid-state image sensors in CMOS/CCD-technology , 2006 .

[19]  Matthias Althoff,et al.  Anytime Safety Verification of Autonomous Vehicles , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[20]  Peng Cao Modeling Active Perception Sensors for Real-Time Virtual Validation of Automated Driving Systems , 2018 .

[21]  Arno Eichberger,et al.  Radarsensormodell für den virtuellen Entwicklungsprozess , 2015 .

[22]  Akihiro Kajiwara,et al.  RCS measurements for vehicles and pedestrian at 26 and 79GHz , 2012, 2012 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems.

[23]  Tristan Cossio,et al.  Predicting Small Target Detection Performance of Low-SNR Airborne Lidar , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.