Determinants behind young motorcyclists' risky riding behavior.

Young motorcyclists have traditionally been considered a high-risk population. Given the critical influence of riders' behaviors on traffic safety, identifying what riders think can help clarify the nature of accidents. Although psychological studies have explored the relationships among personality traits, attitudes and risky driving behavior, the primary difference this study makes from past studies is incorporating both positive and negative effects in a refined causal framework. This study adopts structural equation modeling to analyze data collected from 683 young motorcyclists aged between 18 and 28. The results conclude three primary personality traits of young motorcyclists, namely sensation seeking, amiability and impatience. While amiable riders represent a group of relatively mature and safe riders, the sensation-seeking riders are extremely self-confident, comfortable with unsafe riding and interested in the utility gained from it. Meanwhile, the sensation-seeking ones also are highly aware of traffic conditions, which may lower the chances of getting into an accident, but the accident could be extremely severe if it ever occurs. Impatient riders, having low riding confidence and traffic awareness deficiency, also seek utility from certain risky riding behaviors. However, their fear of an accident leads them to fail to observe surrounding traffic conditions. The result indicates various mental compromise mechanisms for young motorcyclists in conducting riding behaviors. Thus, corresponding countermeasures, including licensure system and ITS roadway development, should consider the heterogeneous characteristics of young riders.

[1]  David D Clarke,et al.  Voluntary risk taking and skill deficits in young driver accidents in the UK. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Richard Wright,et al.  Machine learning in road accident research : decision trees describing road accidents during cross-flow turns , 1998 .

[3]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Individual difference factors in risky driving: the roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Yi-Shih Chung,et al.  Rough set approach for accident chains exploration. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Frank P McKenna,et al.  Risky attitudes towards road use in pre-drivers. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Barry F. Sexton,et al.  THE ACCIDENT RISK OF MOTORCYCLISTS , 2004 .

[7]  Mark J.M. Sullman,et al.  Anger amongst New Zealand drivers , 2006 .

[8]  Jennifer T. Wong,et al.  Comparison of Methodology Approach to Identify Causal Factors of Accident Severity , 2008 .

[9]  P. Dischinger,et al.  Risk perception and impulsivity: association with risky behaviors and substance abuse disorders. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[11]  P. Ulleberg,et al.  Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers , 2003 .

[12]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[13]  R. S. Lynch,et al.  Development of a Driving Anger Scale , 1994, Psychological reports.

[14]  N P Gregersen,et al.  Lifestyle and accidents among young drivers. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  The effects of personality and gender on risky driving behaviour and accident involvement , 2006 .

[17]  Karl Kim,et al.  Attitudes of commercial motor vehicle drivers towards safety belts. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[19]  Ryan C. Martin,et al.  Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Risk homeostasis theory - A study of intrinsic compensation , 1996 .

[21]  Chris G Sibley,et al.  Explicit and implicit self-enhancement biases in drivers and their relationship to driving violations and crash-risk optimism. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[23]  P. Ulleberg PERSONALITY SUBTYPES OF YOUNG DRIVERS. RELATIONSHIP TO RISK-TAKING PREFERENCES, ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT, AND RESPONSE TO A TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMPAIGN , 2001 .

[24]  Kim S. Sankey,et al.  Relationships between young drivers' personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[26]  Ward Vanlaar,et al.  A perceptual map for understanding concern about unsafe driving behaviours. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  C Darviri,et al.  The impact of young drivers' lifestyle on their road traffic accident risk in greater Athens area. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Hilde Hestad Iversen,et al.  Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour , 2004 .

[29]  Hsin-Li Chang,et al.  Motorcyclist accident involvement by age, gender, and risky behaviors in Taipei, Taiwan , 2007 .

[30]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Trait explanations in personality psychology , 1995 .

[31]  R Wright,et al.  Junction road accidents during cross-flow turns: a sequence analysis of police case files. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.