A Computational Framework for Exploring the Socio-Cognitive Features of Teams and their Influence on Design Outcomes

The dynamics of design teams play a critical role in product development, mainly in the early phases of the process. This paper presents a conceptual framework of a computational model about how cognitive and social features of a design team affect the quality of the produced design outcomes. The framework is based on various cognitive and social theories grounded in literature. Agent-Based Modelling (ABM) is used as a tool to evaluate the impact of design process organization and team dynamics on the design outcome. The model describes key research parameters, including dependent, independent, and intermediates. The independent parameters include: duration of a session, number of times a session is repeated, design task and team characteristics such as size, structure, old and new members. Intermediates include: features of team members (experience, learning abilities, and importance in the team) and social influence. The dependent parameter is the task outcome, represented by creativity and accuracy. The paper aims at laying the computational foundations for validating the proposed model in the future.

[1]  John S. Gero,et al.  Modelling expertise of temporary design teams , 2004 .

[2]  Vishal Singh Computational Studies on the Role of Social Learning in the Formation of Team Mental Models , 2009 .

[3]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Self‐leadership and performance outcomes: the mediating influence of self‐efficacy , 1998 .

[4]  Jeffrey W. Herrmann,et al.  Predicting the Performance of a Design Team Using a Markov Chain Model , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Agent-based modelling of quality management effects on organizational productivity , 2015, J. Simulation.

[6]  John S. Gero,et al.  The creative value of bad ideas: A computational model of creative ideation , 2013 .

[7]  YAN JIN,et al.  The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[8]  Amir Karniel,et al.  The exponential learning equation as a function of successful trials results in sigmoid performance , 2010 .

[9]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[10]  John S. Gero,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Experience on Team Behavior: A Computational Approach , 2018, Design Computing and Cognition '18.

[11]  Christopher McComb,et al.  Lifting the Veil: Drawing insights about design teams from a cognitively-inspired computational model , 2015 .

[12]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[13]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Measuring Engineering Design Self‐Efficacy , 2010 .

[14]  John S. Gero,et al.  HOW IMPORTANT IS TEAM STRUCTURE TO TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2011 .

[15]  Heather A. Priest,et al.  Modeling Team Performance: The Basic Ingredients and Research Needs , 2005 .

[16]  Shelley D. Dionne,et al.  Levels-based leadership and hierarchical group decision optimization: A simulation , 2008 .

[17]  Hiroki Sayama,et al.  The effects of mental model formation on group decision making: An agent-based simulation , 2011, Complex..

[18]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Analysis of design projects , 1999 .

[19]  Pierre Lemarinier,et al.  Agent Based Modelling and Simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software , 2017, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[20]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Computational Organization Theory , 2000 .

[21]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[22]  Vishal Singh,et al.  Developing a Computational Framework to Study the Effects of Use of Analogy in Design on Team Cohesion and Team Collaboration , 2015 .