Reexamining the modality effect from the perspective of Baddeley ' s working memory model

Cognitive load theory is widely accepted by instructional designers, since it provides a theoretical foundation of designing guidelines for constructing learning material in a way that enhances learning. According to this theory, learning will be impaired if the learning material causes a cognitive overload. Since the capacity of working memory is very limited, the theory assumes that presenting different sources of information in the same modality (e. g. only visually) easily results in a split-attention effect, which leads to poor learning performance. To avoid this, a method suggested by cognitive load theory is to present information in different modalities (e. g. auditory text plus visual displays). In this article, I would like to address the issue of the effects of presentation-modality on information processing from the perspective of Baddeley’s working memory model. I shall shortly report a study which yields evidence supporting my argument that the modality effect proposed by cognitive load theory should be revised or at least, needs further modification.

[1]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load , 1999 .

[3]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[4]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. , 1990 .

[5]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[6]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[7]  A. Baddeley Is working memory still working? , 2001, The American psychologist.

[8]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[9]  R. Mayer,et al.  Aids to computer-based multimedia learning , 2002 .

[10]  P. Chandler,et al.  The Role of Visual Indicators in Dual Sensory Mode Instruction , 1997 .

[11]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[12]  A. Baddeley Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[13]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[16]  J. Sweller,et al.  Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes , 1995 .

[17]  John Sweller,et al.  Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organisation and presentation of information , 1993 .

[18]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .