Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control

In today's competitive environment, an increasing number of firms are buildingcommon information systems, which will be deployed globally, to support their strategic globalization initiatives. These systems are designed to meet the requirements of a diverse set of stakeholders with different business needs, priorities, and objectives. One managerial tool for addressing and reconciling such differences is control, which encompasses all attempts to motivate individuals to act in a manner that is consistent with organizational objectives. This paper examines two research questions. How do stakeholders exercise control during different phases of large IS projects? Why do control choices change across project phases? Results of two case studies suggest control is exercised differently for each phase. During the initial phase of a project, control is exercised as "collective sensemaking," in which both IS and business stakeholders utilize mostly informal mechanisms of control. During development, "technical winnowing" of mechanisms occurs such that control is vested primarily in IS managers, who structure hierarchical relationships with subordinates and who rely extensively on formal control mechanisms. Both IS and business stakeholders employ formal and informal mechanisms during implementation to exercise control as "collaborative coordinating." The results also suggest that changes in control choices from one project phase to another are triggered by factors in the project, stakeholder, and global contexts. As factors change across phases, so too do control choices. Further, problems that surface in one project phase trigger changes to controls in subsequent phases. These findings are integrated into a model of the dynamics of control. Implications of these results are drawn, and directions for future research are suggested.

[1]  W. Ouchi,et al.  Type Z Organization: Stability in the Midst of Mobility , 1978 .

[2]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[3]  Magnus Mähring IT project governance , 2002 .

[4]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[5]  C. R. Franz,et al.  Group process and conflict in system development , 1989 .

[6]  Bernard J. Jaworski Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences , 1988 .

[7]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[8]  L. Kirsch The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[9]  C. Crisp Control enactment in global virtual teams , 2003 .

[10]  J. O'Brien Management Information Systems: Managing Information Technology in the Networked Enterprise , 1996 .

[11]  S. Snell Control Theory In Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect Of Administrative Information , 1992 .

[12]  Jacob G. Birnberg,et al.  Culture and control: A field study , 1988 .

[13]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[14]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[16]  William G. Olchi The Transmission of Control Through Organizational Hierarchy , 1978 .

[17]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Change Agentry - The Next IS Frontier , 1996, MIS Q..

[18]  W. Ouchi A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[19]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Building Change-Readiness Capabilities in the IS Organization: Insights From the Bell Atlantic Experience , 1997, MIS Q..

[21]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[22]  William R. King,et al.  Patterns in the organization of transnational information systems , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Mani R. Subramani,et al.  The Matrix of Control: Combining Process and Structure Approaches to Managing Software Development , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Blake Ives,et al.  Applications of Global Information Technology: Key Issues for Management , 1991, MIS Q..

[25]  Vincent S. Lai,et al.  Issues of international information systems management: a perspective of affiliates , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Firms, institutions and management control: the comparative analysis of coordination and control systems , 1999 .

[27]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Laura B. Cardinal Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .

[29]  A. Madill,et al.  Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[30]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .

[31]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Information Systems Design Decisions in a Global Versus Domestic Context , 1995, MIS Q..

[32]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[33]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[34]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[35]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  PRIOR LITERATURE : CATEGORIZATION Identification of the Relevant Literature Base , 2007 .

[36]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[37]  Jahangir Karimi,et al.  Globalization and Information Management Strategies , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Information gathering problems in multinational banking , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..