Heading computation in the human retrosplenial complex during full-body rotation

The retrosplenial complex (RSC) plays a crucial role in spatial orientation by computing heading direction and translating between distinct spatial reference frames. While invasive studies allow investigating heading computation in moving animals, established non-invasive analyses of human brain dynamics are restricted to stationary setups. To investigate the role of the RSC in heading computation of actively moving humans, we used a Mobile Brain/Body Imaging approach synchronizing electroencephalography with motion capture and virtual reality. Data from physically rotating participants were contrasted with rotations based only on visual flow. Varying rotation velocities were accompanied by pronounced beta synchronization during physical rotation. In addition, heading computation based only on visual flow replicated alpha desynchronization in the RSC, which was absent during physical rotation. These results suggest an involvement of the human RSC in heading computation based on vestibular input and implicate revisiting traditional findings of alpha desynchronization during spatial orientation in movement-restricted participants. Heading computation is fundamental for spatial orientation in the human and other species. The registration of moment-to-moment changes in orientation with respect to an allocentric reference direction provides information about an animal’s current heading relative to the environment. This is accomplished by the integration of vestibular, proprioceptive, and visual signals providing information about linear and angular velocity signals of the head, the relative position of the head with respect to the trunk, and information about stable aspects of the environment, respectively.1 Single cell recordings in freely behaving animals identified several brain structures involved in heading computation, including the retrosplenial cortex (RSC).2, 3 The RSC receives input from the visual system and from head direction cells in the thalamic nuclei.4 It also hosts subpopulations of heading-sensitive cells that are sentient to local features of the environment, while other cells exhibit mixed activity patterns related to both local and global heading computation.5 These findings suggest that neural activity in the RSC subserves the integration of information about the local and global environment, integrating egocentrically coded landmark cues based on sensory fusion (vision and proprioception)6 with allocentric heading information originating from the Papez circuit.7 This allows the compensation of the rotational offset between egocentric and allocentric spatial representations, routed from the parietal and medial temporal cortices, providing the necessary information for translating between both egocentric and allocentric spatial representational frames in the RSC.8

[1]  Kate Jeffery,et al.  Retrosplenial cortex and its role in spatial cognition , 2017, bioRxiv.

[2]  P. E. Sharp,et al.  Head direction, place, and movement correlates for cells in the rat retrosplenial cortex. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  E. Maguire,et al.  What does the retrosplenial cortex do? , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  On the existence of different types of central beta rhythms below 30 Hz. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Kate Jeffery,et al.  An independent, landmark-dominated head direction signal in dysgranular retrosplenial cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Retrosplenial Cortex Codes for Permanent Landmarks , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  E. J. Green,et al.  Head-direction cells in the rat posterior cortex , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  A. Engel,et al.  Beta-band oscillations—signalling the status quo? , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  Dora E. Angelaki,et al.  Internal models and neural computation in the vestibular system , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Newton method for the ICA mixture model , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[11]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[12]  Scott Makeig,et al.  MoBILAB: an open source toolbox for analysis and visualization of mobile brain/body imaging data , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Annett Schirmer,et al.  Timing speech: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  Human EEG Correlates of Spatial Navigation within Egocentric and Allocentric Reference Frames , 2010, Spatial Cognition.

[15]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[16]  Cenap Çakmak Review and Analysis , 2017 .

[17]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Validating the boundary element method for forward and inverse EEG computations in the presence of a hole in the skull , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Thomas F. Shipley,et al.  Spatial Cognition VII, International Conference, Spatial Cognition 2010, Mt. Hood/Portland, OR, USA, August 15-19, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, Spatial Cognition.

[20]  Giles R. Scuderi,et al.  The Basic Principles , 2006 .

[21]  W. Becker,et al.  Estimation of self-turning in the dark: comparison between active and passive rotation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Linking brain, mind and behavior. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  Kelvin S. Oie,et al.  Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans , 2011, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[24]  J. Bassett,et al.  Neural Correlates for Angular Head Velocity in the Rat Dorsal Tegmental Nucleus , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  Single-Trial Normalization for Event-Related Spectral Decomposition Reduces Sensitivity to Noisy Trials , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[26]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[27]  Peter König,et al.  Cultural background shapes spatial reference frame proclivity , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  G. Curio,et al.  Visual stimuli evoke rapid activation (120ms) of sensorimotor cortex for overt but not for covert movements , 2011, Brain Research.

[30]  Chin-Teng Lin,et al.  EEG correlates of spatial orientation in the human retrosplenial complex , 2015, NeuroImage.

[31]  Klaus Gramann,et al.  Spatial Cognition & Computation: an Interdisciplinary Journal Embodiment of Spatial Reference Frames and Individual Differences in Reference Frame Proclivity Embodiment of Spatial Reference Frames and Individual Differences in Reference Frame Proclivity , 2022 .

[32]  Hermann J Müller,et al.  Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Jefferson E. Roy,et al.  Signal processing in the vestibular system during active versus passive head movements. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Distinct β Band Oscillatory Networks Subserving Motor and Cognitive Control during Gait Adaptation , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[36]  P Clochon,et al.  A new method for quantifying EEG event-related desynchronization:amplitude envelope analysis. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[38]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[39]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  No somatotopy of sensorimotor alpha-oscillation responses to differential finger stimulation , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  Gaby Maimon Modulation of visual physiology by behavioral state in monkeys, mice, and flies , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  Differentiation in Theta and Beta Electrocortical Activity between Visual and Physical Perturbations to Walking and Standing Balance , 2018, eNeuro.

[42]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[43]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Alpha modulation in parietal and retrosplenial cortex correlates with navigation performance. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[44]  D. Angelaki,et al.  Vestibular system: the many facets of a multimodal sense. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  A. Clark Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind , 2015 .

[46]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  Human Brain Dynamics Accompanying Use of Egocentric and Allocentric Reference Frames during Navigation , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Prestimulus Oscillations Enhance Psychophysical Performance in Humans , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[49]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world , 2006, NeuroImage.

[50]  Russell A. Epstein Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  J. Taube Head direction cells and the neurophysiological basis for a sense of direction , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.

[52]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Anchoring the neural compass: Coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  Simon M Stringer,et al.  Optimal cue combination and landmark‐stability learning in the head direction system , 2016, The Journal of physiology.

[54]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  Imaging natural cognition in action. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[55]  M. Stryker,et al.  Modulation of Visual Responses by Behavioral State in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[56]  Saskia Haegens,et al.  Beyond the Status Quo: A Role for Beta Oscillations in Endogenous Content (Re)Activation , 2017, eNeuro.

[57]  Chun-Hsiang Chuang,et al.  Granger causal connectivity dissociates navigation networks that subserve allocentric and egocentric path integration , 2018, Brain Research.

[58]  S. Becker,et al.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. , 2007, Psychological review.