TriMaster: randomised double-blind crossover study of a DPP4 inhibitor, SGLT2 inhibitor and thiazolidinedione as second-line or third-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who have suboptimal glycaemic control on metformin treatment with or without a sulfonylurea—a MASTERMIND study protocol

Introduction Pharmaceutical treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have increased to include multiple classes of oral glucose-lowering agents but without accompanying guidance on which of these may most benefit individual patients. Clinicians lack information for treatment intensification after first-line metformin therapy. Stratifying patients by simple clinical characteristics may improve care by targeting treatment options to those in whom they are most effective. This academically designed and run three-way crossover trial aims to test a stratification approach using three standard oral glucose-lowering agents. Methods and analysis TriMaster is a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial taking place at up to 25 clinical sites across England, Scotland and Wales. 520 patients with T2DM treated with either metformin alone, or metformin and a sulfonylurea who have glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >58 mmol/mol will be randomised to receive 16 weeks each of a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor and thiazolidinedione in random order. Participants will be assessed at the end of each treatment period, providing clinical and biochemical data, and their experience of side effects. Participant preference will be assessed on completion of all three treatments. The primary endpoint is HbA1c after 4 months of therapy (allowing a range of 12–18 weeks for analysis). Secondary endpoints include participant-reported preference between the three treatments, tolerability and prevalence of side effects. Ethical approval This study was approved by National Health Service Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee South Central—Oxford A, study 16/SC/0147. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant scientific meetings. A lay summary of results will be made available to all participants. Trial registration numbers 12039221; 2015-002790-38 and NCT02653209.

[1]  I. Hirsch,et al.  The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) , 2021, Diabetologia.

[2]  J. Dennis Precision Medicine in Type 2 Diabetes: Using Individualized Prediction Models to Optimize Selection of Treatment , 2020, Diabetes.

[3]  Tianjing Li,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials , 2019, BMJ.

[4]  A. Farmer,et al.  Time trends in prescribing of type 2 diabetes drugs, glycaemic response and risk factors: A retrospective analysis of primary care data, 2010–2017 , 2019, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[5]  W. Kernan,et al.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) , 2018, Diabetologia.

[6]  B. Shields,et al.  Sex and BMI Alter the Benefits and Risks of Sulfonylureas and Thiazolidinediones in Type 2 Diabetes: A Framework for Evaluating Stratification Using Routine Clinical and Individual Trial Data , 2018, Diabetes Care.

[7]  B. Shields,et al.  Precision Medicine in Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Markers of Insulin Resistance Are Associated With Altered Short- and Long-term Glycemic Response to DPP-4 Inhibitor Therapy , 2018, Diabetes Care.

[8]  M. Barry,et al.  Oral Pharmacologic Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Clinical Practice Guideline Update From the American College of Physicians. , 2017, Annals of internal medicine.

[9]  J. Shaw,et al.  Predictors of efficacy of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review. , 2016, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[10]  E. Pearson Personalized medicine in diabetes: the role of ‘omics’ and biomarkers , 2016, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  B. Shields,et al.  Markers of β-Cell Failure Predict Poor Glycemic Response to GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[12]  A. Hattersley,et al.  The association between postprandial urinary C‐peptide creatinine ratio and the treatment response to liraglutide: a multi‐centre observational study , 2014, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[13]  A. Tahrani,et al.  SGLT inhibitors in management of diabetes. , 2013, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[14]  D. Rennie,et al.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. , 2013, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  R. DeFronzo,et al.  Relationship of baseline HbA1c and efficacy of current glucose‐lowering therapies: a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials , 2009, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[16]  O. Pedersen,et al.  Targeting hyperglycaemia with either metformin or repaglinide in non‐obese patients with type 2 diabetes: results from a randomized crossover trial , 2007, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[17]  D. Drucker,et al.  The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes , 2006, The Lancet.

[18]  B. Zinman,et al.  A diabetes outcome progression trial (ADOPT): an international multicenter study of the comparative efficacy of rosiglitazone, glyburide, and metformin in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. , 2002, Diabetes care.