Land use changes, greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuel substitution of biofuels compared to bioelectricity production for electric cars in Austria

Bioenergy is one way of achieving the indicative target of 10% renewable energy in the transportation sector outlined in the EU Directive 2009/28/EC. This article assesses the consequences of increasing the use of bioenergy for road transportation on land use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and fossil fuel substitution. Different technologies, including first and second generation fuels and electric cars fuelled by bioelectricity are assessed in relation to existing bioenergy uses for heat and power production. The article applies a spatially explicit energy system model that is coupled with a land use optimization model to allow assessing impacts of increased biomass utilization for energy production on land use in agriculture and forest wood harvests. Uncertainty is explicitly assessed with Monte-Carlo simulations of model parameters. Results indicate that electric mobility could save GHG emissions without causing a significant increase in domestic land use for energy crop production. Costs of electric cars are still prohibitive. Second generation biofuels are more effective in producing fuels than first generation ethanol. However, competition with power and heat production from ligno-cellulosic feedstock causes an increase in GHG emissions when introducing second generation fuels in comparison to a baseline scenario.

[1]  C. Field,et al.  Greater Transportation Energy and GHG Offsets from Bioelectricity Than Ethanol , 2009, Science.

[2]  V. Singh,et al.  The EPIC model. , 1995 .

[3]  K. Neville,et al.  Forests, food, and fuel in the tropics: the uneven social and ecological consequences of the emerging political economy of biofuels , 2010, The Journal of peasant studies.

[4]  H. MacLean,et al.  Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Paul A. Steenhof,et al.  A comparison of alternative technologies to de-carbonize Canada's passenger transportation sector , 2008 .

[6]  H. Schmid,et al.  Controls on Annual Forest Carbon Storage: Lessons from the Past and Predictions for the Future , 2008 .

[7]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Choices in calculating life cycle emissions of carbon containing gases associated with forest derived biofuels , 2003 .

[8]  C. E. Thomas Transportation options in a carbon-constrained world: Hybrids, plug-in hybrids, biofuels, fuel cell electric vehicles, and battery electric vehicles , 2009 .

[9]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Combining hybrid cars and synthetic fuels with electricity generation and carbon capture and storage , 2011 .

[10]  Enver Doruk Özdemir,et al.  Land substitution effects of biofuel side products and implications on the land area requirement for EU 2020 biofuel targets , 2009 .

[11]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[12]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Techno-economic comparison of series hybrid, plug-in hybrid, fuel cell and regular cars , 2010 .

[13]  S. Lamlom,et al.  A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species , 2003 .

[14]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[15]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[16]  Jimmy R. Williams,et al.  Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: Model description and testing against long-term data , 2006 .

[17]  M. Kirschbaum To sink or burn? A discussion of the potential contributions of forests to greenhouse gas balances through storing carbon or providing biofuels , 2003 .

[18]  Enli Wang,et al.  Biofuels agriculture: landscape‐scale trade‐offs between fuel, economics, carbon, energy, food, and fiber , 2010 .

[19]  Sylvain Leduc,et al.  Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria. , 2011 .

[20]  Andrea Hublin,et al.  NATIONAL INVENTORY REPORT 2007 , 2007 .

[21]  E. Robert,et al.  Indirect Land Use Change From Increased Biofuels Demand - Comparison of Models and Results for Marginal Biofuels Production from Different Feedstocks , 2010 .

[22]  Erwin Schmid,et al.  On the choice of farm management practices after the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in 2003. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  J. Lange Lignocellulose conversion: an introduction to chemistry, process and economics , 2007 .

[24]  P. Ciais,et al.  Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks , 2008, Nature.

[25]  E. Schmid,et al.  CropRota – A crop rotation model to support integrated land use assessments , 2011 .

[26]  C. Thiel,et al.  Cost and CO2 Aspects of Future Vehicle Options in Europe under New Energy Policy Scenarios , 2010 .

[27]  N. Hartmann,et al.  Impact of different utilization scenarios of electric vehicles on the German grid in 2030 , 2011 .

[28]  Svend Bram,et al.  Using biomass : A system perturbation analysis , 2009 .