On the contingent value of IT-based capabilities for the competitive advantage of SMEs: Mechanisms and empirical evidence

Abstract This article assesses the value of the capabilities developed through the use of Information Technology (IT) in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), by analysing whether these capabilities are a determinant of the intra-industry differential in their performance. Our work makes two principal contributions to the understanding of the value of IT. First, the article shows that externally oriented IT-based capabilities have a greater impact on the firm’s intra-industry differential in revenue growth and profitability than those capabilities focused on efficiency improvement, namely internally oriented IT-based capabilities. Essentially, this result is consistent with two facts: i) the greater importance that market and supply chain relationships have for firms with a limited scale compared to efficiency improvement, and ii) the greater social and organizational complexity captured by IT use in firm’s external relationships. Second, through a contingent perspective, our article shows that the returns of externally oriented IT-based capabilities are more likely to provide performance advantages to SMEs in contexts of low munificence and low dynamism. This evidence thus highlights that under these environmental conditions, IT is more likely to hinder than to facilitate SMEs’ ability to respond to market changes and new opportunities.

[1]  Emilio Paolucci,et al.  Is it all about size? Comparing organisational and environmental antecedents of IT assimilation in small and medium-sized enterprises , 2013, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[2]  David G. Brown,et al.  The Status of Ubiquitous Computing , 2003 .

[3]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[4]  Emilio Paolucci,et al.  Are customers' reviews creating value in the hospitality industry? Exploring the moderating effects of market positioning , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[5]  Oliver Schilke On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism , 2014 .

[6]  Yi Wang,et al.  IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[9]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[10]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Information-Processing Alternatives for Coping with Manufacturing Environment Complexity , 1999 .

[11]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[12]  Blake Ives,et al.  Review: IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2005, MIS Q..

[13]  Alfredo J. Mauri,et al.  Firm and industry effects within strategic management: an empirical examination , 1998 .

[14]  Ali Tafti,et al.  Information Technology and Firm Profitability: Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence , 2012, MIS Q..

[15]  Ron Adner When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition , 2002 .

[16]  S. Dutta,et al.  Strategic Management Journal Research Notes and Commentaries Conceptualizing and Measuring Capabilities: Methodology and Empirical Application , 2022 .

[17]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[18]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Ying Lu,et al.  Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination , 2011, MIS Q..

[20]  H. Hollanders,et al.  Regional Innovation Scoreboard , 2014 .

[21]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Making Intangibles “Tangible” in Tests of Resource-Based Theory , 2011 .

[22]  P. Drnevich,et al.  Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance , 2011 .

[23]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[24]  Roman Kmieciak,et al.  Innovativeness, empowerment and IT capability: Evidence from SMEs , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[25]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[26]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[27]  Ja-Shen Chen,et al.  Information technology adoption for service innovation practices and competitive advantage: the case of financial firms , 2007, Inf. Res..

[28]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  The Incredible Shrinking Portuguese Firm , 2011 .

[29]  Christoph Zott,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDY , 2003 .

[30]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[31]  O. A. Sawy,et al.  Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights , 2013 .

[32]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[33]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[34]  Jianwen Liao,et al.  Organizational Absorptive Capacity and Responsiveness: An Empirical Investigation of Growth–Oriented SMEs , 2003 .

[35]  Oliver Schilke,et al.  Second-Order Dynamic Capabilities: How Do They Matter? , 2014 .

[36]  Douglas W. Vorhies,et al.  The Capabilities and Perfor Mance Advantages of Market‐Driven Firms: An Empirical Investigation , 2000 .

[37]  Nava Pliskin,et al.  From Governance to Adaptability: The Mediating Effect of IT Executives' Managerial Capabilities , 2010, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[38]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: Findings from case studies , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms , 2003 .

[40]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[41]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Innovating to Create IT-Based New Business Opportunities at United Parcel Service , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[42]  Waleed A. Muhanna,et al.  IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[43]  Paolo Neirotti,et al.  Profiting from IT Investments in Small and Medium Enterprises: How Does the Industry Environment Influence the Returns of IT-Based Capabilities? , 2012, ICISTM.

[44]  M. Porat The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement. , 1977 .

[45]  Paul P. Tallon Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility , 2008, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[46]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[47]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[48]  Eileen Fischer,et al.  International entrepreneurship in internet-enabled markets , 2011 .

[49]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation - Diversifying the Information Systems Research Agenda , 2007, Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation.

[50]  J. Papastavrou,et al.  Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect Fdi Survival , 1998 .

[51]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[52]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[53]  A. Lewin,et al.  Co-evolution of global sourcing: The need to understand the underlying mechanisms of firm-decisions to offshore , 2011 .

[54]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[55]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[56]  R. Brodie,et al.  An investigation of marketing practice by firm size , 2000 .

[57]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Ling Li,et al.  Effects of enterprise technology on supply chain collaboration: analysis of China-linked supply chain , 2012, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[59]  V. Grover,et al.  A process-oriented perspective on differential business value creation by information technology: An empirical investigation , 2008 .

[60]  Marcelo Nogueira Cortimiglia,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Strategy and business model design in dynamic telecommunications industries : A study on Italian mobile network operators , 2014 .

[61]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  On the Relationship Between Firm Size and Export Intensity , 1992 .

[62]  Francesca Montagna,et al.  Understanding the organizational impact of PLM systems: evidence from an aerospace company , 2012 .

[63]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Scale Without Mass: Business Process Replication and Industry Dynamics , 2008 .

[64]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..