Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online

We introduce the concept of social media self-efficacy (SMSE).We examine this concept using survey data (N=3568) of Internet users.Users with higher SMSE find online social information to be more trustworthy.They also use others' opinions and social media when evaluating information. This study introduces the concept of social media self-efficacy, or a person's perceived ability to reach desired outcomes in the social media environment, and examines the relationship between social media self-efficacy and how people evaluate information found online. Results of a survey of a representative sample of adult Internet users in the United States (N=3568) indicate that users with higher social media self-efficacy find information shared via social media to be more trustworthy than do those lower in social media self-efficacy. These self-efficacious social media users also rely more both on the opinions of others and on social media specifically when evaluating or verifying the information they find online, suggesting that they may be more prone to seek out and be influenced by input from others. Practical and theoretical implications of these findings are explored.

[1]  Coye Cheshire,et al.  The Social Psychological Effects of Feedback on the Production of Internet Information Pools , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Hot Diggity Blog: A Cluster Analysis Examining Motivations and Other Factors for Why People Judge Different Types of Blogs as Credible , 2011 .

[3]  Robert H. Wicks.  Schema Theory and Measurement in Mass Communication Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in News Information Processing , 1992 .

[4]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[5]  P. Kalbfleisch.  Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2003 .

[6]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The Internet and Health Communication: A Framework of Experiences , 2001 .

[7]  Andrew J. Flanagin.  Credibility in the 21st century : Integrating perspectives on source, message and media credibility in the contemporary media , 2003 .

[8]  William Voon,et al.  Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[10]  Kathleen C. Perencevich,et al.  Children's Motivation for Reading: Domain Specificity and Instructional Influences , 2004 .

[11]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[12]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Connecting with the user-generated Web: how group identification impacts online information sharing and evaluation , 2014 .

[13]  G. Eysenbach.  Credibility of Health Information and Digital Media: New Perspectives and Implications for Youth , 2007 .

[14]  S. Sundar.  The MAIN Model : A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size , 1993 .

[16]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  C. Sunstein.  Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge , 2006 .

[18]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users , 2004 .

[19]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[21]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility , 2000 .

[22]  Peter C. Neijens,et al.  The Ironic Effect of Source Identificationon the Perceived Credibility of Online Product Reviewers , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  The Computer-Email-Web (CEW) Fluency Scale--Development and Validation , 2001 .

[24]  Seong-Jae Min.  From the Digital Divide to the Democratic Divide: Internet Skills, Political Interest, and the Second-Level Digital Divide in Political Internet Use , 2010 .

[25]  S. West,et al.  Experimental personality designs: analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[26]  R. Glen Hass,et al.  Temporal delay, type of forewarning, and resistance to influence , 1975 .

[27]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  The Revolution Will be Networked , 2010 .

[28]  Mark Batey,et al.  A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[31]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[32]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[33]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Gilad Mishne,et al.  Finding high-quality content in social media , 2008, WSDM '08.

[35]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[36]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation systems , 2000, CACM.

[38]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[39]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Trust online , 2000, CACM.

[40]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[41]  R. Rice,et al.  An Integrated Model of Knowledge Sharing in Contemporary Communication Environments , 2009 .

[42]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  What makes Web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study , 2001, CHI.

[43]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[44]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Clay M. Voorhees,et al.  Conveying Trustworthiness to Online Consumers: Reactions to Consensus, Physical Store Presence, Brand Familiarity, and Generalized Suspicion , 2010 .

[46]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[47]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[48]  S. Fiske,et al.  What does the Schema Concept Buy us? , 1980 .

[49]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Trusting expert- versus user-generated ratings online: The role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  A Bandura,et al.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: Cognitive Theory. , 1986 .

[51]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[52]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online , 2010 .

[53]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[54]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[56]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[57]  Miriam J. Metzger.  Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..